I looked in all the stickies but I could not find the answer to this question.
My friend was saying how he could maintain 14 enchantments on his party indefinatly using a combination of life bond, blessed signet, balthazars spirit and boon signet. I say he can't as the 10 energy degen(approximatly 4e/sec) would become too much for for boon and blessed signet, and most likely spirit to overcome.
so the questions are: can infact maintain the 14 enchantments that he claims to and, if so can you sustain them indefinatly using the skills listed above and/or any skills in the game?
thank you
Enchantment question
shoe
ubermancer
Hopefully this answers your question:
xiao1985
very pretty... nice encht'ing
imagine the energy you will gain with ether renewal!!! O.o
imagine the energy you will gain with ether renewal!!! O.o
moskvich
but can you do that without qz? 
ubermancer
Its an old picture, you can no longer hold enchants that would cause your energy regen to drop to -11.
Niosisw
Not only that, but that image is clearly photoshopped.
Hidden in the Mist
Anyone remember that old screenshot of a monk maintaining over 50 enchantments at once?
Zui
Quote:
Originally Posted by Niosisw
Not only that, but that image is clearly photoshopped.
No, the image is not clearly Photoshopped. Infact, it hasn't been through any image editing application, as far as I can tell. It's possible that it is a fake, there's just no way to confirm it, unless you look at the actual image for signs of it being edited, which in this case would be looking for pixels on the interphase that don't belong, or aren't where they should be because whoever was faking it was sloppy. Of course, doing that would take quite a bit of time. You posted 2 hours and 5 minutes after that image was posted, and that's not really enough time to do that, and do a proper job of it. Unless of course there's some giganticly obvious flaw, and he was that sloppy making it, yet for some reason knew how to remove the photoshop tag, and bothered to remove the photoshop tag, just incase someone opens it up in their oh so common hex editor, instead of looking at it in an image editing application under magnification...
Of course, someone posting a fake image, and bothering to remove the photoshop tag in a hex editor just incase someone checks is alittle overboard, don't you think? It's not like it's *that* hard, it's just entirely pointless, as how many people are even going to bother checking it, since what's shown in that screenshot was entirely possible before maintaining that many enchantments was nerfed...
In addition, someone who was able to make an entirely flawless fake in under an hour, or for some reason faked an image just incase someone posted this topic in the future, is also, highly unlikely.
In short, what you're saying is entirely improbable, and you've offered absolutly zero proof.
For everyone without a hex editor: Open up the image in notepad(save it first). Look for some kind of time/date tag, and possibly the name of a program in it. You won't find any. Telling us that it's very unlikely someone edited it.
Niosisw, if you have some kind of proof, please post it. If you do not, please never claim somthing that you have absolutly no proof, either way on.
Of course, someone posting a fake image, and bothering to remove the photoshop tag in a hex editor just incase someone checks is alittle overboard, don't you think? It's not like it's *that* hard, it's just entirely pointless, as how many people are even going to bother checking it, since what's shown in that screenshot was entirely possible before maintaining that many enchantments was nerfed...
In addition, someone who was able to make an entirely flawless fake in under an hour, or for some reason faked an image just incase someone posted this topic in the future, is also, highly unlikely.
In short, what you're saying is entirely improbable, and you've offered absolutly zero proof.
For everyone without a hex editor: Open up the image in notepad(save it first). Look for some kind of time/date tag, and possibly the name of a program in it. You won't find any. Telling us that it's very unlikely someone edited it.
Niosisw, if you have some kind of proof, please post it. If you do not, please never claim somthing that you have absolutly no proof, either way on.