Originally Posted by KESKI
This post is getting funny
![]() I wonder where are all those "Emperor is the evil one" or "Fortune teller is evil" theory's facts?? If you find the prove for Shiro been evil is not strong enough, where did you guys get all this Emperor and the Fortune teller been evil?? Bad mouthing the victim's life to defend one's virtue without proves?? However, do we have enough evidence to say Shiro is evil when he was alive?? No, not realy, sure he did a lot of killing, but those are their life style back then, I am sure Prince Rurik did his share of bandit killing(so do we). Clearly Gods in gw dont give a damn about that ![]() Is Shiro evil 200 years later?? Of course he is, what kind of good envy turn lives to afflicted, terrorize the land, dirt the good dragon, and kill me once?? However Shiro's evil is not so bad compare to the lich king. For Shiro, its like "This is me, and this is my armies, defeat us and you win, lose you will all join me." For the Lich King "Um...my armies suck(lv 13 undead armies) and the murrsat is guarding soul stone, so I cant use my trump card(titans) to terrorize the land. Ah, I know, I will use this group of know nothing heros to kick murrsat's ass and when they are both tired I will give them both a good kick in the balls" see~ Lich King just pow Shiro in evilness. Poor Shiro, doesnt matter how he tried, he cant be the best in the hero or the villain. Over all, A-Net just did a crapy job on story telling in both GW ![]() |

