Well, after bashing the some scribe articles and state of the game articles, it looks like anet got a better writier. The GWFC match reports are a great read. No blatant typos or facts.
Well, after bashing the some scribe articles and state of the game articles, it looks like anet got a better writier. The GWFC match reports are a great read. No blatant typos or facts.
Where you bashing Anet because you were denied the job of 'writier'?
Agreed, Josh's article on the last EvIL-iQ match was masterfully written. He managed to capture the true essence of a match that has already been heavily contested on these boards.
Ok, you've made your point and even more of you made comments about the typos and grammar of the other posters, which makes this thread more off-topic than on and I call that spam (and a run on sentence ).