Armor absorbtion confusion..

rukia miharu

Pre-Searing Cadet

Join Date: Aug 2006

I first red this here: http://gw.gamewikis.org/wiki/Absorption

"Ascalon Armor and Knight's Armor reduce physical damage taken by 3. This effect is not global, and the damage reduction only applies to hits taken on area of the body covered by knights or ascalon armor."

But then after talking to someone who said hes been playing for like 18months, he sais that Wiki was wrong and that the Ascalon Armor and Knight's Armor reduction IS actually global.

I tried to search on this forum and seen some 1year old thread confirming what this person was saying but nothing too recent. So what is it, is wiki wrong and the reduction is global? Or was it changed recently and wiki is right?

Loviatar

Underworld Spelunker

Join Date: Feb 2005

Quote:
Originally Posted by rukia miharu
I first red this here: http://gw.gamewikis.org/wiki/Absorption

"Ascalon Armor and Knight's Armor reduce physical damage taken by 3. This effect is not global, and the damage reduction only applies to hits taken on area of the body covered by knights or ascalon armor."

But then after talking to someone who said hes been playing for like 18months, he sais that Wiki was wrong and that the Ascalon Armor and Knight's Armor reduction IS actually global.

I tried to search on this forum and seen some 1year old thread confirming what this person was saying but nothing too recent. So what is it, is wiki wrong and the reduction is global? Or was it changed recently and wiki is right?
THE GLOBAL HAS BEEN FIXED RECENTLY AND HE IS WRONG.

PROTECTION IS NOT GLOBAL ANYMORE

rukia miharu

Pre-Searing Cadet

Join Date: Aug 2006

You dont know how happy you just made me, I was affraid I just wasted 10 platinum on pointless knight armor that doesnt stack.

The Muffen Man

The Muffen Man

Krytan Explorer

Join Date: Sep 2005

Druery Lane

W/

It used to be global but in an update not too long ago anet fixed that bug along with the -2 on shields and the absorbtion rune where they used to be against all damage now only vs physical

rukia miharu

Pre-Searing Cadet

Join Date: Aug 2006

Oh and while we're on the subject, could you just confirm if superior rune of absorbtion stack with the knight armor? (even tho Im pretty sure it does, just want to remove all doubts from my mind ).

Age

Age

Hall Hero

Join Date: Jul 2005

California Canada/BC

STG Administrator

Mo/

Quote:
Originally Posted by rukia miharu
You dont know how happy you just made me, I was affraid I just wasted 10 platinum on pointless knight armor that doesnt stack.
This is wrong about it doesn't stack it now does as it didn't use to be before as it would say non stacking.This is why it was global.

Loviatar

Underworld Spelunker

Join Date: Feb 2005

Quote:
Originally Posted by rukia miharu
Oh and while we're on the subject, could you just confirm if superior rune of absorbtion stack with the knight armor? (even tho Im pretty sure it does, just want to remove all doubts from my mind ).
sup absorb rune will stack with anything except another absorb rune

armor plus rune yes

rune plus rune no

Former Ruling

Grotto Attendant

Join Date: Oct 2005

Cedartown, Georgia

R/

You still wasted 10 Plat on Knights armor though. :\ It is subpar armor even with the reduce now being 3. Other armors have higher AL which just pwns -3 dmg...

Remember even TEN more AL > -3 reduce

Align

Align

Krytan Explorer

Join Date: Oct 2005

Protectors of Awesome[AWE]

W/

You only need one sup absorb, any more than that is a waste of money and armor rune slots.
But each piece of knights/ascalon "increases" the chance of taking reduced physical damage(check guildwiki for % chance of being hit on a particular piece of your armor), since if youre hit where you aren't wearing any reduction armor, itll only be reduced by your other modifiers such as shield or rune.

Dzan

Wilds Pathfinder

Join Date: May 2005

The Black Dye Cartel

Quote:
Originally Posted by Former Ruling
You still wasted 10 Plat on Knights armor though. :\ It is subpar armor even with the reduce now being 3. Other armors have higher AL which just pwns -3 dmg...

Remember even TEN more AL > -3 reduce
Quoted for truth.

majoho

majoho

Forge Runner

Join Date: Jul 2006

Denmark

Don't worry about what some people say, in many situations damage reductions is better than higher armor.

imsystem

Frost Gate Guardian

Join Date: Jul 2005

northern cal

Quote:
Originally Posted by majoho
Don't worry about what some people say, in many situations damage reductions is better than higher armor.
but more often in normal play your not taking physical dmg.

i think dmg reduction is almost usless now unless your farming specific enemys that only do physical.

Russell.Crowe

Lion's Arch Merchant

Join Date: Aug 2005

glads ftw?

Sekkira

Sekkira

Forge Runner

Join Date: Apr 2005

Canberra, AU

Actually -3 damage reduction is equivilant to 10AL. On top of that, considering it's a solid damage reduction, damage isn't reduced by percentage. If you are being hit for physical damage of 3 at 100AL, bring it up to 110AL and you'll still be taking at least 1 damage. Damage reduction will cancel that out and you'll be hit for a bunch of 0's.