Please read the attached docmuent.
Tried sending it to A-net but they redirected me here. So nice of them...
Please post you opinions, suggestions and most importantly signatures below.
Thank you
Campaign Concept: NEW DAWN
chappo
chappo
11 views and no opinions? Come on people, I'd like your opinion on this.
Went through it with my friend today who especially liked how I structured the end battle. Much better than the crappy 1 minute battle with Shiro.
Went through it with my friend today who especially liked how I structured the end battle. Much better than the crappy 1 minute battle with Shiro.
Addone_Abaddon
I'm guessing you used to be a WoW player, mounts, good and evil (horde and alliance)
Apart from them, I like it, well, the half goat will kinda ruin guild wars only playing human characters.
I have a problem with the good and evil starting in different areas aswell... I am not telling you to p*** and play WoW, it just doesn't fit in with gw.
I like the idea of the mursaat.
Apart from them, I like it, well, the half goat will kinda ruin guild wars only playing human characters.
I have a problem with the good and evil starting in different areas aswell... I am not telling you to p*** and play WoW, it just doesn't fit in with gw.
I like the idea of the mursaat.
chappo
Finally someone to give their opinion. Thankyou!
No, I've never played WOW. Don't like the concept of paying for the same content every month. they have mounts? could be a god reason for GW to up their profile a bit to keep up with the competition.
The half goat thing is like a last resort thing. notice how a-net are going through the different human races? caucasian efnicality, to asian to african. (hope I didn't offend anyone there, was not intended). looks like they are running out of choices anyway, plus arn't people bored of been human?
the good/evil start thing adds something I think. Kurzicks and luxons had no real reason to battle I thought and was a waste of time. plus gw has been mainly based on good guys. why not have a choice? i bet many necs long to be evil. Muhahahahahaha. Plus it will make the last battle more interesting, what better evil to fight than real human evil? And if they do something clever like hench replacement for the "no opponents" thing then jobs'a'gudden
Glad you like the idea of the musaat. I want the queen to be the absolute main char. I feel the mursaat was badly done to in proph and like to know more about them. Plus the queen is caught in the middle so it's not focusing on the bad guy or good guy
and if possible i'd like to know what happened to Gwen, which is why I like the Firebrand idea (http://www.guildwarsguru.com/forum/s...php?t=10054574)
That should be implemented too.
No, I've never played WOW. Don't like the concept of paying for the same content every month. they have mounts? could be a god reason for GW to up their profile a bit to keep up with the competition.
The half goat thing is like a last resort thing. notice how a-net are going through the different human races? caucasian efnicality, to asian to african. (hope I didn't offend anyone there, was not intended). looks like they are running out of choices anyway, plus arn't people bored of been human?
the good/evil start thing adds something I think. Kurzicks and luxons had no real reason to battle I thought and was a waste of time. plus gw has been mainly based on good guys. why not have a choice? i bet many necs long to be evil. Muhahahahahaha. Plus it will make the last battle more interesting, what better evil to fight than real human evil? And if they do something clever like hench replacement for the "no opponents" thing then jobs'a'gudden
Glad you like the idea of the musaat. I want the queen to be the absolute main char. I feel the mursaat was badly done to in proph and like to know more about them. Plus the queen is caught in the middle so it's not focusing on the bad guy or good guy
and if possible i'd like to know what happened to Gwen, which is why I like the Firebrand idea (http://www.guildwarsguru.com/forum/s...php?t=10054574)
That should be implemented too.
Chimaera
I like the idea of knowing more about the mursaat, but i have a feeling thats going to be covered in Nightfall.
I agree it does sound very WoW, Satyrs are (non playable) characters, horde-alliance etc etc.
Nothing wrong with that, although i think the idea of having mounts would severely damage the game mechanics, if you can take more damage and run faster with mounts then they would have to up the enemy damagelimits, but then what if you're not on a mount? Plus people would just be non stop running to the end of missions, its a nice idea but not for GW, would change the game too much for arnet to accept.
Maybe in GW2 whenever it arrives.
I agree it does sound very WoW, Satyrs are (non playable) characters, horde-alliance etc etc.
Nothing wrong with that, although i think the idea of having mounts would severely damage the game mechanics, if you can take more damage and run faster with mounts then they would have to up the enemy damagelimits, but then what if you're not on a mount? Plus people would just be non stop running to the end of missions, its a nice idea but not for GW, would change the game too much for arnet to accept.
Maybe in GW2 whenever it arrives.
mega_jamie
Wow, this encompasses two ideas which have been sugested a zillion times before and I feel very strongly against, so if we just skip over me raging on how we dont need new races or mounts I think we will all be better off.
Also, do you really think Anet have the time to read every idea that is sent to them, atleast yours had a marginal degree of effort, but imagine the thousands of half cocked ideas they get every day, hell even their complainst get sent to the community, lol
Also, do you really think Anet have the time to read every idea that is sent to them, atleast yours had a marginal degree of effort, but imagine the thousands of half cocked ideas they get every day, hell even their complainst get sent to the community, lol