The Guardian is designed to do what the warrior could do all too well: Tank. But the guardians primary attribute, Power, increases the chance of a random double strike single enemy/strike all adjacent enemies.
Name: Guardian
Weapon: Dual Swords
Basic health at level 20: 495
Basic energy at level 20: 25
Attributes and related skills:
Power (Primary)
Increases the chance of striking target foe twice/striking all adjacent foes. Power skills increase your own attributes and others as well.
Related skills:
War Experience
Increases Offense Attribute by 1...3
Book of Assault
For your next 3 attack skills, you strike +10...24 damage
Foresight (Elite)
The next 3 attack skills against you are evaded
Dual Sword Mastery
Increases the power you deal with dual swords.
Related skills:
Tearing Blades
Attack Skill. If this attack hits, target foe suffers from bleeding for 3....15 seconds.
Whirling Combination
Strike target foe twice, with each attack only dealing 15...27 damage
Crossblades (Elite)
Attack target foe. If the foe is in a stance, that stance ends and the foe suffers from a deep wound for 3...8 seconds.
Offense
Offense increases the effect of your stances and shouts.
Related skills:
Awareness
For 5...13 seconds you have a 50% chance to evade attacks
"Stay where you are!"
Target foes cannot moves 90% slower for 1...3 seconds
Panther's Wit (Elite)
For 10...34 seconds, you attack 50% faster but suffer -3...1 health degeneration.
Support
These skills can heal life and energy to you and other allies
Related skills:
Treat Wounds
Remove bleeding, deep wound and poison from target ally, and heal ally for 3..28 health
Rest
For 5 seconds, you gain 3...5 energy regeneration. This skill ends if you move
Renew Self(Elite)
Gain 47...108 health and 3 energy if you are under the effects of 2 or more conditions.
I would like some feedback and ideas to help me
General
Concept Class - Guardian
I The General I
Crom The Pale
Sorry but assasin has ruined any possibility of a dual wielding class being added.
One reason is that the damage of the swords would need to be equal or less than daggers or youd get assasins using them for way to much damage. You might have noticed daggers are just slightly more than half what a standard sword has for max damage.
Basicaly youve come up with some nice skills that could be added to an assasin or warriors skill set, with a little balancing, but this could not be a new class in GW.
Sorry.
One reason is that the damage of the swords would need to be equal or less than daggers or youd get assasins using them for way to much damage. You might have noticed daggers are just slightly more than half what a standard sword has for max damage.
Basicaly youve come up with some nice skills that could be added to an assasin or warriors skill set, with a little balancing, but this could not be a new class in GW.
Sorry.
Brandon1107
its way to much like a warrior except with a few monk skills thrown in. I like the dual swords idea but try making it not EXACTLY like another poffesion.
actionjack
Dual Weapons I think is still a possible option... depend on how its done.
But with daggers already, its not that Wow to have another sets of pre-set dual swords...
As above two said... still feel much like a Warrior. A Gurdian, as the name suggest, should Guard more. Which might be good to have more Self or Party Defensive skills (but need to work differntly from a Monk), and/or ways to draw enemy fire. Ward heavy proffession would fit the picture.
But with daggers already, its not that Wow to have another sets of pre-set dual swords...
As above two said... still feel much like a Warrior. A Gurdian, as the name suggest, should Guard more. Which might be good to have more Self or Party Defensive skills (but need to work differntly from a Monk), and/or ways to draw enemy fire. Ward heavy proffession would fit the picture.
Brandon1107
Look at my proffession then: The Patronus *wink wink nudge nudge*
BahamutKaiser
I think the description you designed for this class was a good one, a class that actually involves tanking, taking the damage in another players stead, would be an inovation. What you have is a warrior identity, mixed with assassin and dervish attacks, and some warrior and paragon like support and shout skills.
There is nothing new here at all, it offers nothing that the game doesn't already have, and moreover, it isn't what you described. Tell me how is a dual sword weilding class even pretend to be more defensive than a warrior who uses a shield?
Beyond that, I am not totaly against new classes with swords, but there should be some distinction between this class and warrior, either rapiers and sabers, or tachi and katana, something significantly different within the realm of swords, not the same thing.
There is nothing new here at all, it offers nothing that the game doesn't already have, and moreover, it isn't what you described. Tell me how is a dual sword weilding class even pretend to be more defensive than a warrior who uses a shield?
Beyond that, I am not totaly against new classes with swords, but there should be some distinction between this class and warrior, either rapiers and sabers, or tachi and katana, something significantly different within the realm of swords, not the same thing.
Rurik Jangeer
Personally, this class wouldn't change much if we could just make the "Wassin" Wa/Mo LFG! lol, no offense meant.
We already have a protector class in the game in the form of Paragons
/notsigned
We already have a protector class in the game in the form of Paragons
/notsigned
Made In Ascalon
The main attribute is
A)Not very original.
B)Broken. Why is it broken? Because it increases the chance to double strike AND attack adjacent targets. This would mean that you have a possibility of attacking all adjacent foes twice, about the equivalent of a primary attribute Hundred Blades. Not to mention that the difference between this and dagger mastery, is that this can be translated to a weapon such as, say, an axe, or even a hammer. In order to not be broken, the percentage would have to be REALLY low, making it not very useful. I'd suggest changing it if you can think of something more distinguishable from different classes, but I can't see any way to salvage it.
...did you even READ the first post? What about this class is similar to paragons?
A)Not very original.
B)Broken. Why is it broken? Because it increases the chance to double strike AND attack adjacent targets. This would mean that you have a possibility of attacking all adjacent foes twice, about the equivalent of a primary attribute Hundred Blades. Not to mention that the difference between this and dagger mastery, is that this can be translated to a weapon such as, say, an axe, or even a hammer. In order to not be broken, the percentage would have to be REALLY low, making it not very useful. I'd suggest changing it if you can think of something more distinguishable from different classes, but I can't see any way to salvage it.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Rurik Jangeer
Personally, this class wouldn't change much if we could just make the "Wassin" Wa/Mo LFG! lol, no offense meant.
We already have a protector class in the game in the form of Paragons /notsigned |
I The General I
I admit looking back it does look a lot like a warrior, and i'll work on that
and i will get rid of the power primary and work on it a bit
thanks for the feedback ^.^
and i will get rid of the power primary and work on it a bit
thanks for the feedback ^.^