Antdote signet vs Remedy signet

double the recharge, and only works on certain conditions. but doesn't antidote signet remove multiple conditions at once? Granted, I'd more than likely take Remedy over antidote usually, but antidote definitely has its uses. Antidote is fine for what it does. Remedy Signet will only ever remove the top condition on the condition stack, whatever it may be.
No matter how many conditions you have, no matter where on the stack it is, it'll take off Blindness for you. Poison's not really an issue, as sources of Poison tend to be able to reapply it with ease, and Disease is a toss-up in usefulness.


Mending Touch, despite having a cost, is the flexible self multi-condition strip for any profession that can afford to go secondary monk though.

Whats unfair about that? Remedy signet only removes 1 condition, Antidote removes up to 3.

BTW if you want some better self condition removal, use mending touch. But only 1 of those three it can remove is even worth removing from mid stack >_>

If Antidote Signet removed Blindness, Cripple, and [whatever] as its three removed, it would be worth it. But as it is now...its a 2 sec cast, huge recharge (compared to every other condition removal in the game), and only mildly effective because of its condition choice...

Not like remedy signet is any better though..

There are just too many better self condition removal options...
1) Plague Touch - If your touch range. No recharge means even though it only removes one you can cut through a small stack to the one you want to get rid of. Also has the bonus of giving it to your target.
2) Signet of Malice - This is even a signet itself, and with the spammability of conditions from yourself this can be useful.
3) Mending Touch - The all-propose remover...2 Conditions on a 4 recharge for 5energy (lower if your a ranger).