(i just started playing btw)
Is the spear king of ranged attack or is the bow. I wanted 2 make a non-wammo paladin and i wanted a ranger so i have a P/R. I naturally thought that the bow was the best ranged weapon because the ranger is mostly offensive and the paragon is a support class who uses the spear sparingly.
Spears generally are MUCH faster than bows and to my surprise, they did a lot more damage! Its base damage is less than a bow but its speed and STRONG adrenal and energy skills more than make up for that. Its also xtremely versatile because its attack range falls just short of a friggin longbow... (though it does the most damage midrange), unlike a bow which has a very selective range and has drawbacks with that range.
If the spear is so strong why don't i see every ranger carrying one- am i missing someting?
I want to make a bow weilding character but not if the spear is so godlike. lol if it is, the spear wud b better suited in the hands of a ranger or warrior than a paragon...
- i do admit that marksmanship skills have more useful effects than spear mastery skills who focus almost soley on damage.
(and btw, if i choose to go bow, do i really have to switch bows every time the target is moving, close up, far away..., heavily armored..., standing still..., ETC O.O)
c
