OK, I used to think that piercing damage meant armor penetration, until 5 minutes ago when I read the article on GuildWiki. GuildWiki states that it does [B]NOT[B] mean armor penetration, but it does not explain the difference between the two.
Can someone shed some light on the difference between the 2?
Slashing and Piercing Damage
1 pages • Page 1
Both are forms of physical damage. An opponent may have protection from one or weakness to one. For example:
http://gw.gamewikis.org/wiki/Necromancer_armor
notice the bonelace armor.
http://gw.gamewikis.org/wiki/Necromancer_armor
notice the bonelace armor.
A
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by I Phoenix I
Geoffer's Bulwark, which may or may not be common now (was a while ago due to Ranger Spike) gives +10 vs Slashing damage.
|
Slashing damage: most swords, most axes, most pets, some daggers, all scythes.
Piercing damage: Pickaxe-style axes, Colossal Pick (a hammer), Dune Lizard and Black Widow pets, some daggers (more than Slashing), all spears, Spike Trap and Barbed Trap.
Blunt damage: Jitte (a sword), most hammers.
Piercing and Slashing damage are both typre of physical damage. The only Difference is the type of weapon they are on. Bow's arrows, some daggers, pointed axes... all do piercing because they all come to a point and have no real blade. Whereas swords, most axes, scythes, some daggers... all have a bladed edge to them.
