Do chars have to look like Barbie/Ken?
ur worst night mare
go play wow u already gave anet 50 bucks for the game. (please no ranting i know it isnt 50 bucks with cost to make game ect) i hope u enjoy spending lots of money playing a game that is boring as hell. =)
sh4d0whunta
wow just killed the warcraft storyline im not saying wow is a bad game but it killed the storyline of warcraft. because warcraft is one of the most intriging storys ive ever been bare to witness
BahamutKaiser
Warrior Profession doesn't include all those varieties of combatant as Angel describes.
It is very obvious that they are intended to mark a very narrow function of combat and not the spectrum of martial arts, as pretty much any melee combatant could be coined "warrior" whether they swing a sword, scythe or daggers. Faking katana use certainly doesn't put them anywhere near Samurai, and no amount of visual alteration and adjustments would coin that identity, nor most of the others.
As for comparison to WoW, most of those non-attractive options involve other races, not making your super hot female elf ugly. Which goes back to the point that brining race options in would be better than new visual models only slightly different than the exsisting human models but with even greater payloads in armor options.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Angel Netherborn
Now that's a whole bunch of stereotypes that's just plain misleading... For warriors, you're only talking about the wrestling types. You don't think martial artists, swashbucklers, pirates, fencers, knights, samurai, and more are warriors? If you look at the history, I doubt you'll find much warriors that are as bulky as what we have in GW.
|
As for comparison to WoW, most of those non-attractive options involve other races, not making your super hot female elf ugly. Which goes back to the point that brining race options in would be better than new visual models only slightly different than the exsisting human models but with even greater payloads in armor options.
Ralli Pemirl
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Aeon_Xin
No offense, but good riddance.
Now that she's gone mods, Lock/delete this topic? |
There is nothing wrong with beauty. I like beauty, and I like Guild Wars.
There is nothing wrong with uniqueness, either, and plainness, and conservativeness, and weirdness, and even ugliness, in my opinion. Perhaps there is nothing wrong even with prejudism... not that those who prefer beauty are prejudiced. They are human.
I went back to Wow (very begrudgingly) not because Guild Wars lacked variety but because I missed playing with my real life friends who refused to buy Guild Wars. I will attempt not to post on this subject anymore.
Esprit
Whether the OP is playing Guild Wars or not, still raises a good point, that most characters generally give off an anorexic feel.
If you are running around three continents, you probably will not be overweight, but at the same time your muscles would be toned and you would not look like a Barbie or Ken doll/action figure.
When I choose armor, I try to find more modest armor, something that actually looks like armor.
Armor can look functional and good looking at the same time, I'd like to see that in the next chapter.
If you are running around three continents, you probably will not be overweight, but at the same time your muscles would be toned and you would not look like a Barbie or Ken doll/action figure.
When I choose armor, I try to find more modest armor, something that actually looks like armor.
Armor can look functional and good looking at the same time, I'd like to see that in the next chapter.