Vampiric or Sundering?

BogusDude

Frost Gate Guardian

Join Date: Mar 2006

MARA

R/

27 Feb 2007 at 15:30 - 41
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrick Smit
vampiric will be better in terms of DPS in PvE, however, sundering can be much better in melee/physical based PvP teams.
Saying sundering suxs is absolute scrap to my opinion, and you are just copying words of others, or relying on very simple calculus.

Check this discussion for more on why sundering can be better then vampiric in PvP: http://www.guildwarsguru.com/forum/s...php?t=10123000
You obviously didn't read the "PvE only player" bit :P

If your not into PvP or do little in comparison to PvE then why waste a good sword on a sundering mod. The guy on the original post doesn't say whether he intends to use it for PvE or PvP use or both.

general consensus seems to be zealous or vamp for PvE use
Sundering, elemental, vamp for PvP use
Its gonna come down to personal preference with your choice, as always theres never gonna be 1 best weap for all situations.

RTSFirebat

RTSFirebat

The Humanoid Typhoon

Join Date: May 2005

UK

Servants of Fortuna [SoF]

R/

27 Feb 2007 at 15:39 - 42
Sundering has to be the worst mod of all time. I mean with a Vamp mod you get addtional damage AND health gain with every hit.

Where as Sundering only works 20% of the time, do all the maths all you want, but in the end Vamp has a much higher Damage Over Time then Sundering does hands down.

Sure you have -1 health regen with vamp, but this can easily be countered with a small heal every now and again.

Plus you can switch to a non-vamp weapon when your not in battle.

Puebert

Puebert

Desert Nomad

Join Date: Oct 2005

Mo/

27 Feb 2007 at 22:11 - 43
Thank you everyone, thats responded. I've decided to keep the Vampiric. Thank you.

You can close this thread if you want. ^^