Remove -health items

Saphrium

Saphrium

Krytan Explorer

Join Date: Oct 2006

Granite Citadel

Post Searing Ascalonian Merchants

N/Me

It will solve majority of the farming problem.

Tarun

Tarun

Technician's Corner Moderator

Join Date: Jan 2006

The TARDIS

http://www.lunarsoft.net/ http://forums.lunarsoft.net/

/not signed - just no. Farming gets enough nerfs as is.

Saphrium

Saphrium

Krytan Explorer

Join Date: Oct 2006

Granite Citadel

Post Searing Ascalonian Merchants

N/Me

Farming is not GW

Replicant

Lion's Arch Merchant

Join Date: Jan 2006

R/Me

oh that would be a lovely idea, lets have NO penalty for wearing all superior runes on your armor....... Lets see.. my W/* could use... Superior Axe, Superior Strength, Superior Tactics, Superior Absorbtion, Superior Vigor... all without any penalty.. and still have a slot open for a Superior Swords if i ever decide to use a sword...
</sarcasm>

Farmings been nerfed enough already...

Oh.. and the majority of the game is PvE.. so the game is about PvE and Farming..

Sk8tborderx

Sk8tborderx

Jungle Guide

Join Date: Nov 2005

PA

Us Are Not [leet]

W/

Even if you were to get rid of all 55'ers there will still be tons of warriors (like myself) who will still go on happily farming in the places 55'ers couldn't because of heavy enchant removal/heavy interrupts.

The only ones who would be affected by this would be the bots, and that is only until they program them to run with a 105 build, if they have not done so already.

Why do people hate 55 monks so much?

Jaythen Tyradel

Jaythen Tyradel

Jungle Guide

Join Date: Apr 2005

Um, you might need to flesh out your proposal on WHY the -health items need to be removed. Stating it will solve farming problems isn't significant enough.
I'm not anti-farm or pro-farm myself. I could care less IMO how things effect farmers, unless it drastically affects the game and the vast majority of players.

/not signed. just not a reasonable suggestion.

Tarun

Tarun

Technician's Corner Moderator

Join Date: Jan 2006

The TARDIS

http://www.lunarsoft.net/ http://forums.lunarsoft.net/

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sk8tborderx
Even if you were to get rid of all 55'ers there will still be tons of warriors (like myself) who will still go on happily farming in the places 55'ers couldn't because of heavy enchant removal/heavy interrupts.

The only ones who would be affected by this would be the bots, and that is only until they program them to run with a 105 build, if they have not done so already.

Why do people hate 55 monks so much?
Because they do not have the intelligence or patience to learn how to 55. Farming is enjoyable when you have a goal to aim for. Just like leveling and every other form of grinding. :P

gameshoes3003

gameshoes3003

Forge Runner

Join Date: Feb 2006

Quote:
Originally Posted by Saphrium
It will solve majority of the farming problem.
/notsigned
I see very little thought process as blatantly shown through his eight word suggestion...
By the way, Guild Wars does include farming. That's PvE for you.

Coloneh

Coloneh

Furnace Stoker

Join Date: Nov 2006

D/W

Quote:
Originally Posted by Saphrium
Farming is not GW
theres a debate. dont assume everyone feels the same way as you. BiPs need negative Hp items to.

/notsigned

lyra_song

lyra_song

Hell's Protector

Join Date: Oct 2005

R/Mo

Quote:
Originally Posted by Saphrium
It will solve majority of the farming problem.
i wasnt aware there was a problem....

HawkofStorms

HawkofStorms

Hall Hero

Join Date: Aug 2005

E/

/notisnged
105 monks still work.

Antheus

Forge Runner

Join Date: Jan 2006

Maybe it's just me, but last time I used a 55 was before there was when tombs were still pvp.

As far as I'm concerned, 55 is a thing of the past. Even in UW there's so many alternative builds that work much faster. For lower end there's always VwK, warriors or even eles.

So, no. It wouldn't solve farming.

Then again, I don't really farm anymore, but getting rid of negative health so I can put all sups on my regular characters would be great.

Undivine

Undivine

of Brackenwood

Join Date: Oct 2005

Ontario, Canada

The next time you post, please be a little more specific in your ideas.

However, that is not the reason why this thread is now closed. If that was all, I'd simply ask you to edit your first post. The reason this thread is closed is because this suggestion has been brought up before. I'd suggest you use search.

Not only has it been brought up before, but it is an atom bomb ticking. The farming debate, if you've followed these forums (and I'm not ragging on you if you haven't) is a sure-fire way to get a lot of people generally pissed off.

Thus closed. My apologies, but this thread never had a chance.