That's the first thing that came to my mind after I read the initial musing on GW2. I mean, the whole thing sounds like the bastard child of Lineage II and City of Heroes, spiced with a few novel ideas from WoW.
In other words, sounds like something NCSoft, not ArenaNet, would come up with. Maybe I'm wrong. I hope I'm wrong. But in the off chance that I'm right, I just wonder what ANet is doing these days then...
Conspiration Theory: ANet is losing control over GW
1 pages • Page 1
Conspiracy theory: There is no Anet. There is no Guild Wars. This is all an elaborate illusion to keep you distracted as aliens suck your brains.
I mean honestly what I see when i read postings about GW2 is Anet listens to their customers. If you hang out in Sardelac, these ideas have been floating around for a long time and a LOT of players want it.
How Anet will implement these ideas and still maintain the feel and core of Guild Wars is what remains to be seen.
I mean honestly what I see when i read postings about GW2 is Anet listens to their customers. If you hang out in Sardelac, these ideas have been floating around for a long time and a LOT of players want it.
How Anet will implement these ideas and still maintain the feel and core of Guild Wars is what remains to be seen.
D
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by lyra_song
Conspiracy theory: There is no Anet. There is no Guild Wars. This is all an elaborate illusion to keep you distracted as aliens suck your brains.
|
After Factions was release, I DID think that ANet wasn't bothering to listen to their player base, because there were a lot of great ideas I saw suggested before its release, and basically none were implemented. I don't know if it was some kind of community backlash they received or if a light bulb suddenly came on, but they seemed to have listened a bit with Nightfall. They implemented a lot of the "little" things that went a long way.
Also, I doubt ANet is losing control of GW2 to NCSoft. ANet's reasoning that the game was going to become too bloated was pretty logical; I mean, if it kept going, and you got to 6 or 7 chapters, what new player would play if it meant you had to buy all of them and pay $40-50 per chapter just to be competitive in PvP?(Yes. I know the earlier chapters would have gone down a bit, but I don't feel like estimating inflation too :P I think they may have also gotten tired of designing similar campaigns with the same 6 classes and two new ones, and having to design extra skills for all the old classes and entire new skillsets for the new ones. Guess they figured it would be easier just to start from the ground up again rather than try and do it that way.
a
Yes its all a conspiracy... in fact i bet that GW stands for George W and was in fact a game developed by the amercian government to brain wash the world's youth into joining the military...
Seriously gw2 is two years away... at least wait for the beta and actually play the game before making stuff up.
Seriously gw2 is two years away... at least wait for the beta and actually play the game before making stuff up.
F
I think its important to remember that we are A YEAR away from even the BETAS of this game...Yes the magazine makes the game sound like GWoW (Guild Wars of Warcraft), but that doesn't mean anything is final and we know nothing about the details of gameplay.
Like 100 threads popped up trying to make thoeries on GW2 based off of currect GW when we don't even know that the game will even play the same or use the same system for skills and such (the attribute system).
Anything the magazine says can only be taken as early ideas since the game is one year away from betas..and we know how much a game can change just from betas to release..much less before they even beta test it...
Like 100 threads popped up trying to make thoeries on GW2 based off of currect GW when we don't even know that the game will even play the same or use the same system for skills and such (the attribute system).
Anything the magazine says can only be taken as early ideas since the game is one year away from betas..and we know how much a game can change just from betas to release..much less before they even beta test it...
V
E
If you would like to see some sales figures...
http://news.mmosite.com/content/2007...11500823.shtml
http://news.mmosite.com/content/2007...11500823.shtml
K
T
Geez. You people have no sense of humor. If I was really serious about this, I wouldn't write "conspiracy theory" in the post title.
I just wanted to note how ArenaNet seems to be (positively) using ideas from other NC games, and other successful games on the market, and do that while riding in the crazy speculation wave.
I just wanted to note how ArenaNet seems to be (positively) using ideas from other NC games, and other successful games on the market, and do that while riding in the crazy speculation wave.
It's far easier to believe that Anet is simply listening to the parts of the player base I vehemently disagree with, which may even be the majority (I don't really know). It's sad that GW2 seems to be going in such a substantially different direction, it's sad that some of the things I like most about GW are being limited or eliminated in the new game, and it's sad as a result that, barring a major change of design, my GW gaming will end with Eye of the North.
T
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pazu
Geez. You people have no sense of humor. If I was really serious about this, I wouldn't write "conspiracy theory" in the post title.
I just wanted to note how ArenaNet seems to be (positively) using ideas from other NC games, and other successful games on the market, and do that while riding in the crazy speculation wave. |
2. You're still speculating.
whats a constipation theory?
Seriously though... there ARE no truly new ideas in games. Anet is using its own engine and format (no monthly fees) and responding to players. It's not a conspiracy. GW2 is going to require some major work. While I love the instance based game that is GW1, and the pvp, and hell the pve... a crossover which somehow avoids the pitfalls of shall we say other MMO's in the persistent side would really make my day.
edit: on second thought it would make my year...
Seriously though... there ARE no truly new ideas in games. Anet is using its own engine and format (no monthly fees) and responding to players. It's not a conspiracy. GW2 is going to require some major work. While I love the instance based game that is GW1, and the pvp, and hell the pve... a crossover which somehow avoids the pitfalls of shall we say other MMO's in the persistent side would really make my day.
edit: on second thought it would make my year...
T
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pazu
That's the first thing that came to my mind after I read the initial musing on GW2. I mean, the whole thing sounds like the bastard child of Lineage II and City of Heroes, spiced with a few novel ideas from WoW.
In other words, sounds like something NCSoft, not ArenaNet, would come up with. Maybe I'm wrong. I hope I'm wrong. But in the off chance that I'm right, I just wonder what ANet is doing these days then... |

