Ok - because of the number of recent threads about people being "unjustly banned" for bot behavior, I was curious. ANet's defense is that they do a thorough job of investigation before banning an account for 3rd party software. But is that possible?
Gaile has already said in another post that they ban 2000 account per week. Now, let's say they have 4 people employed full time (40hrs/week) to investigate bots. Each one must investigate 500 per week. That means 12.5 accounts investigate per person per hour. That comes to 4.8 minutes spent investigating each account.
Hmm, if someone spent less than 5 minute observing me, I might appear to be a bot too.
On the other hand, if they were to spend even as much as 1/2 hour "thoroughly investigating" each bot suspect, they would have to employ 25 full time people who did nothing but check on possible bot accounts. Do you honestly think they do that?
Me thinks many of those who said they were banned unjustly just may be telling the truth.
A



.