Zero tolerance on flaming?

2 pages Page 2
Wyat Hawke
Wyat Hawke
Frost Gate Guardian
#21
Quote: Originally Posted by jrk247

I do not believe in the higher rank you are (more posts) that you should get banned for longer, I've seen a lot of new posters flame more often than the veterans of GWG, but I've also seen many veterans flame, maybe just have a set amount of time for flamers so no matter what everyone gets the same ban duration for flamming.
You misunderstood my point
What I meant is that a zero tolerance is a zero tolerance. A flame should be a flame, it doesn't matter who posts it. Thing is, the more known members of this site (who flame) gets off the hook too easily compared to the newbies. Say, if Ensign flamed, which admin would have the guts to impose a mini-ban on him?

1 flame = 1 ban

Regardless of your name or fame.
Wyat Hawke
Wyat Hawke
Frost Gate Guardian
#22
Quote: Posting this thread here was actually a bad idea, here we only get responses from the truly dedicated ones and the admins. May I request to re-post in Sardelac or the Riverside in? Alternatively, I'd wish that you all made a public announcement in all threads stating that flaming will result in bans.
Uhm, bump? Am I allowed to do this or not? since anyone hardly reads these forums...
Rocky Raccoon
Rocky Raccoon
Desert Nomad
#23
Quote: Originally Posted by jrk247
Well you also have to realise that the members aren't supposed to report posts (even though they can), they are not mods. It is the mods job to look through threads and moderate them not to just wait for reports to come in. And even if you only deal with a few posts a day, you have to realise that you aren't the only mod (hopfully). We as members of the forum are an an integral part of the system. If you see something that is wrong why not report it? The moderators can use all the help we can give them. On a few occasions where I was personally flamed I reported them and things were taken care of. I would like to add my praise to the thankless job they do, keep up the good work people.
Avarre
Avarre
Bubblegum Patrol
#24
Quote: Originally Posted by Wyat Hawke
Say, if Ensign flamed, which admin would have the guts to impose a mini-ban on him? I'd totally do that.


As far as noting for flaming goes, the biggest discrepancy which comes down to moderator opinion is what constitutes a flame. The vast majority of reports I get about flame posts aren't really insults, but generally people disagreeing with the reporter, calling them wrong, etc.

More 'famous' people tend to get 'off the hook' because the flames they post are usually along the lines of 'you are wrong' (generally somewhat harsher), which is not a flame in the context of discussion. That's community service; promote quality, discourage crap.

As for who gets modded... I've edited/deleted flame/improper posts from every rank, including Gaile.
Wyat Hawke
Wyat Hawke
Frost Gate Guardian
#25
Quote: May I request to re-post in Sardelac or the Riverside inn? My question still stands. Can I do this, to get more responses (from those who don't bother reading this forum section)?
I
Inde
Site Contributor
#26
Wyat, you want a discussion on flaming in a forum that is supposed to be dealing with Guild Wars game issue and discussion. I understand the point of a discussion with the community but moving this into a forum supposed to be about Guild Warswould only generate the same complaints that you were speaking out against. This is a site issue. One of your first responses would be "great, another thread complaining about the complainers". A discussion on flaming would yield nothing more then... flames. We are trying to keep flames down, non-contributing negativity, one-liner spam, flamebait but a discussion with the community on this isn't an educational process that would be providing enlightenment for anyone. Most who are flaming know full well what they are doing, will defend it to the death, and are of the opinion matter that it's deserved/necessary/ or defensive.
1 up and 2 down
1 up and 2 down
Wilds Pathfinder
#27
Quote: Originally Posted by Avarre
As for who gets modded... I've edited/deleted flame/improper posts from every rank, including Gaile. When has Gaile ever had to have a post of hers edited/deleted, maybe there is a darkside of Gaile we(the community) don't know about!

Oh mods the deletion of that goldseller's thread(s) was pretty fast, kudos for that.
Divinus Stella
Divinus Stella
Desert Nomad
#28
I think the moderating on guru is fine, theres too many carebear forums like GWOnline that delete and edit every post that doesnt end in " <3 GAILE PWNS "
bart
bart
Desert Nomad
#29
might i suggest the the report abuse icon be a bit larger with the words "Report Abuse"? i think many ppl don't know that that function exist of forget about it when they want to report a violation simply because it is not big enough.
M
Malice Black
Site Legend
#30
The report button can't be modified, it is part of the forum software.
I
Inde
Site Contributor
#31
Actually, it's just a graphic. It can indeed be modified, enlarged, changed, even text added. We'd have to find a good way to do this though as we don't want column widths or lengths thrown off by it.
HuntMaster Avatar
HuntMaster Avatar
Wilds Pathfinder
#32
i think warnings should be giving out before a ban unless the violation was completely abusive. like cursing or name calling. real life threats should also result in a permanent ban.

if someone words their reply in a way that seems rude "Flamish" they should be contacted by a mod telling them to amend their post so it does not provoke flaming or hurt feelings. this would allow those of us who accidently word something wrong to go back and fix it. a Friendly Reminder can help alot, and will stick with us and make us members appreciate the understanding of the community. some times we just make mistakes, not all of us are rude on purpose.

I believe everything Wyat Hawke has said, especially the intro post to be common sence. as a child i was taught to respect others and treat them as i want to be treated, but that seems to not matter when dealing with online games in general. which makes me sad because we could prosper so much more as a community and as indaviduals if we just worked together instead of soley for ourselves.

I also support Mini Bans and Long Term Bans when dealing with abusive members. if someone makes a mistake, dont ban them, teach them not to do it again, and if they value their participation with this site they will stop.
I also believe and understand that it is up to the members to assist the mods/admins in keeping our community clean and stable. the site isnt a requirement of the game, it is a bonus!

i would also like to add that as wonderful a feature the report button is, we should only use it when it is truely needed. (Reading Post's in a Bad Mood is never a fair way to judge the material. calm down then re-read the post before you make the call. thanks.

thanks you all for providing guildwar players like myself a place to come and share our thoughts and ideas, and to meet other players.
Avarre
Avarre
Bubblegum Patrol
#33
We usually do pm/warn for minor offenses. Temp-bans varying in length aren't used until the offender violates the rules several times.
Kakumei
Kakumei
Forge Runner
#34
I've a vested interest in this particular topic, as many people consider me a 'troll'. While I certainly was at some point in the past--I did receive a deserved three-month ban--I would say that I've cooled down quite a bit.

However, people still tend to point out whatever I post as 'flames', however mild it might be--I don't sugarcoat what I say like many others, and if someone's acting like an idiot, I have no qualms about calling them out on it (if the mods disagree, that's their prerogative and their site).

I'm of the opinion that the definition of a 'flame' is too broad--just disagreeing with someone isn't flaming them. Recognizing that a topic will not garner worthwhile discussion and pointing this fact out isn't flaming.

I think a good, official definition of 'flaming' is in order. But that's just me.
Avarre
Avarre
Bubblegum Patrol
#35
Quote: Originally Posted by Kakumei

I'm of the opinion that the definition of a 'flame' is too broad--just disagreeing with someone isn't flaming them. Recognizing that a topic will not garner worthwhile discussion and pointing this fact out isn't flaming.

I think a good, official definition of 'flaming' is in order. But that's just me. I agree with this.

I can't speak for the rest of the moderators as I'm sure definitions vary, but the definition of flaming I've worked with is;

'Direct or indirect personal attacks on a player, or sufficiently offensive commenting taking into account language used.'

I have no problem with people calling out others on being wrong - fostering stupidity isn't a good thing. In those cases it comes down to the severity of language and whether the comment makes personal remarks as to whether I'd want to take action.
M
Malice Black
Site Legend
#36
What I consider a flame:

Calling people retarded, stupid, moron etc

Also such things as "this thread fails" or "the OP fails"

Anyone that can't form a proper sentence/paragraph should be sent for English lessons. I know we are a multi national forum BUT it is generally the English speakers which fail so miserably at their own language. Closing of such threads wouldn't be harsh IMO, as these threads tend to only draw out the grammar nazi's.

I'm all for people disagreeing, it makes for some entertaining reading.

I'm up for moderating in Riverside if you need a hand, as it seems a lot of the Riverside mods are less then active.
Avarre
Avarre
Bubblegum Patrol
#37
Quote: Originally Posted by Malice Black
I'm up for moderating in Riverside if you need a hand, as it seems a lot of the Riverside mods are less then active. My workload has increased dramatically (important year in school) so my overall time is pretty limited now.
M
Malice Black
Site Legend
#38
Quote: Originally Posted by Avarre
My workload has increased dramatically (important year in school) so my overall time is pretty limited now. Ah school, I remember those days..barely lol. When you leave and get over the intial excitment of leaving you will soon want to go back.
SnipiousMax
SnipiousMax
Perfectly Elocuted
#39
Quote: Originally Posted by 1 up and 2 down
Oh mods the deletion of that goldseller's thread(s) was pretty fast, kudos for that. Mod's are like precision missles when it comes to goldsellers! :P
Squinty
Squinty
Pre-Searing Cadet
#40
So could someone answer me a question please.

If you post in a forum with a subject that is relevant to that forum and something you want to discuss with others, and it contains none of the following:

1. No flaming
2. No insults
3. No trolling
4. Contains your opinions on the subject

Is it correct that because your opinion does not match the moderators opinion he should just remove the post, without explanation besides maybe calling you a scrub !

I ask this because in one of your forums this is an almost daily occurence, the situation is such that any new thread which does not match the moderators opinions is closed almost immediately, but now and again they insult those who have posted before closing, and a friend of mine was actually banned permanently for asking the moderator why his posts were deleted in a PM.

I'm asking here as I think if I approached the moderator through PM I too would be banned, if and administrator wants details I will forward them by PM.

I hope this does not get ignored as the forum in question could be so much more active if a little common sense was used.