Adjust Concussion Shot
Evilsod
Will you 2 shut up with the RED ENGINE GORED ENGINE GORED ENGINE GORED ENGINE GOing quote stacks... NOBODY is reading them but you 2... nobody is going to care what points you bring up in them because NOBODY IS READING THEM!
What is the point of this thread anymore... half of your posts are just countering off-topic crap and the rest is you been too stupid to figure out that nobody is offering suggestions and numbers because nobody wants it changed.
What is the point of this thread anymore... half of your posts are just countering off-topic crap and the rest is you been too stupid to figure out that nobody is offering suggestions and numbers because nobody wants it changed.
Fitz Rinley
Deleted: I checked three times to see if this posted and it always said no. So, I reconstructed and reposted my response.
Fitz Rinley
Quote:
Curse You: Quote:
|
Quote:
Curse You: From that, I get that you feel that just because you don't like it, it needs to be changed. |
Quote:
Curse You: The skill is underused because (as was said earlier) people are generally very bad at interrupting. Since this skill requires a person to be a good interrupter, many people don't like to use it. It is not because it is a bad skill. |
Quote:
Curse You: Right. You yourself, in the exact thing I quoted said, "Certainly, I should expect poor performance and lousy tracking." Don't just try telling me the opposite, just because you realized that you messed up. If you had some decency, you could at least mention your error, rather than just flat out contradicting yourself. Just because you have difficulties in a area with lots of stuff to process (all those bots), don't go telling me about how it must be a problem on their end, when you've admitted to having a weak computer. |
Quote:
Curse You: New? Buddy, I've posted more things than you (a lot more), and so it could be assumed that I know more when it comes to this kind of stuff. And from the looks of things, I do. You cannot call a secondary profession's attribute a part of your primary, that's not how it works. I also know well enough that a R/Mo with healing prayers (or any martial based primary) is never a good combo. Sure you may be able to heal yourself, but isn't that what the monk is for? There are a number of skills that could assist you that belong to your primary, as well as the attribute you're already using, rather than those belonging to you secondary. And frankly, I can easily use my warrior with Strength 8, Axe 10, Tactics 12. |
I have not called a secondary profession attribute a primary, I have allotted normal wise distribution for those that are courteous enough to carry a res of some sort. Those who are capable may carry something better than res sig. Those who are not must use the latter as a back up. Those that party with no resurrection are ill mannered players. When I stated Heal, I generally gave it low marks and the skill applied: Resurrection Chant. A Wa/Mo that does not have health should not spend time rezzing, especially if there are foes in agro. I did not recommend a Ranger take heals from Healing Prayers. I have quite successfully used, in the Ring of Fire, Healing Spring and Troll Ungeant. You again completely miss the point, just as with the numbers. Yes, I could spend a couple of days drawing up charts of every attribute combination within 3, 4, 5, 6, or all attribute possibilities. I have the analytical background and training to do this. And if you understand what I have said, then you understand why you do not use your warrior as Wa/Ele with Str 7, Sword 7, Tac 7, Hammer 7, Axe 7, Earth 7, Fire 7, and remainder 4.
Quote:
Curse You: I can easily make a poison ranger work with Expertise 12, Marksmanship 10, Wilderness 8. Poison is an easy condition to apply. Also, why do you seem to think that the only mix with three attributes is 12, 12, 3? |
Quote:
Curse You: In case you didn't notice, no one agrees with you. Also, Concussion Shot isn't the only interrupt skill for rangers. It's a skill intended to be used by someone who is able to interrupt to give them an easier time interrupting after their fist interrupt. |
[QUOTE][QUOTE]Fitz Rinley:
You might try paying attention to what you read. But since you want a slightly better break down:
Quote:
Curse You: I'm quite certain I understood it perfectly clear. It basically tells you that you agree that they have full rights to do whatever they choose with their game, even if it negatively effects you. I don't see how your "speech" was at all relevant. Sure negativity isn't always bad, but when you start ranting about their actions being "immoral" I start opposing the negativity. If they want to change their game, that's their business. They choose to listen to their customers. They could also choose to do whatever they want. The only reason they don't is because they need customers to make money. I've look at the positive points of your proposed change. I know that they are outweighed by the bad points. |
Your ability to read the EULA was not in question. Your ability to comprehend what I have stated has been.
Curse You
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fitz Rinley
There is no reference to influence from or to others. Ignorance is a matter of lacking knowledge. It should not be confused with having inspiration, interest, volition, or passion. Too many young people use this term incorrectly.
|
Oh look, I found ignorance in your speech about how you're not ignorant.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fitz Rinley
The number of times you have posted is irrelevant. I have acquired titles, but I do not display them because they are meaningless. Sheepskin, by any amount of decoration, is just dead flesh with ink on it and does not imply capability.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fitz Rinley
I have not called a secondary profession attribute a primary, I have allotted normal wise distribution for those that are courteous enough to carry a res of some sort.
|
"I know full well the ranger class is, unlike most, is especially geared with augmentive skills that are across 5 attribute areas."
Rangers only have 4 attributes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fitz Rinley
I don’t it is the only mix which maxes two attributes. Maxed power is always better than minimum power when your only intended goal it absolute. The only intended goal is DP/DR or Damage Production over Damage Received. Everything done is to maximize damage produced and maximize reduction of damage received.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fitz Rinley
And again, once used it is so cost inefficient that it negates its value. In order to make it seem valuable you have to lose your elite slot and pump expertise at the expense of other attribute areas.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fitz Rinley
Promotion of tyranny is immoral.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evilsod
Will you 2 shut up with the RED ENGINE GORED ENGINE GORED ENGINE GORED ENGINE GOing quote stacks... NOBODY is reading them but you 2... nobody is going to care what points you bring up in them because NOBODY IS READING THEM!
|
I also agree that this thread is really going nowhere at this point. Might be worth it to close the thread, since I don't think I have anything more to say on this topic, but Fitz might see otherwise.
Evilsod
Fitz... ask the Ranger community what they think of Concussion Shot... i'm pretty sure most, if not all of them have no problem with it and understand that its extremely high energy is VERY justifiable.
Considering Fitz isn't really bringing up anything useful either, seriously, you actually think mentioning a Wammo is good? And then you're trying to justify how 5 attribute lines should be used... even when 1 of them is for a res thats completely irrelevant, thats not an extra attribute line.
I'm still waiting for an explanation as to how someone with so much knowledge of the Ranger class seems to think there are 5 attribute lines, and further more how a build can actually involve all 4 attributes lines effectively without just having 1 build that does everything badly instead of some things well.
Considering Fitz isn't really bringing up anything useful either, seriously, you actually think mentioning a Wammo is good? And then you're trying to justify how 5 attribute lines should be used... even when 1 of them is for a res thats completely irrelevant, thats not an extra attribute line.
I'm still waiting for an explanation as to how someone with so much knowledge of the Ranger class seems to think there are 5 attribute lines, and further more how a build can actually involve all 4 attributes lines effectively without just having 1 build that does everything badly instead of some things well.
HawkofStorms
For the love of god, all you two (Fitz and Curse You) are doing is bitchering about typos and trying to find ways to call the other guy stupid by finding (with some doubious behavior) logical "flaws." Just stop.
Curse You
Quote:
Originally Posted by HawkofStorms
For the love of god, all you two (Fitz and Curse You) are doing is bitchering about typos and trying to find ways to call the other guy stupid by finding (with some doubious behavior) logical "flaws." Just stop.
|
Risa
Cuncussion Shot does not need to be adjusted. It's actually a pretty good skill. Forgive me for having no interest in the countless quoted previous posts. I read a few posts...Until it was the same two people quoting each other about (probably) completely unrelated things to the topic...
Nevin
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evilsod
Avatar of Lyssa is worth using, nobody uses that in PvP.
Meteor Shower is worth using, nobody uses that in PvP. Just because its not used in PvP doesn't mean it sucks... people use Broadhead Arrow in PvP because Prot monks are very hard to interrupt. This isn't Crude Swing or Power Shot... its an interrupt that inflicts the most powerful anti-cast condition in the game. Its very cost effective and there are many ways to cover the cost. |
Evilsod
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevin
Wow.. I've seen plenty of people use Lyssa in PvP, along with Meteor shower... Even in the same build.
|
Although funnily enough i did just watch a GvG where the ele used GoSac Meteor Shower... although that was purely to make wards a danger zone........ once every 90 seconds... what a complete waste.
RhanoctJocosa
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evilsod
RA/TA/AB builds don't count... for anything.
Although funnily enough i did just watch a GvG where the ele used GoSac Meteor Shower... although that was purely to make wards a danger zone........ once every 90 seconds... what a complete waste. |
EDIT: Fitz, trying to boast your intellectual prowess to a bunch of GAMERS on a GAMING forum just proves what a lowlife you are. Stop posting kthx?
around
Glyph Sac+Meteor Shower is massive lulz at VoD.
I'll let you figure out why.
I'll let you figure out why.
Evilsod
I'm sure it is... on a ele who is speccing in Air, Prot and Energy Storage! Its adjacent... its not even big enough AoE to do anything at VoD since hte NPCs don't stand THAT close together. And how does Meteor Shower stop a flag runner or help a huge push? It was a complete waste of a skill, i assume GoSac was for Res Chant.
And thats all i have to say on this as its completely pointless.
And thats all i have to say on this as its completely pointless.
Curse You
Wow, this thread has truly gone. All that's happening now is people are beating it with a stick, talking about something totally unrelated to the topic.
Fitz Rinley
Five is a number next to four on a keyboard. An intelligent person would see that. But then an intelligent person would understand the only way for a person to ''effect'' someone else is through reproduction. Since, I am an intelligent person I have always read this as ''affect'' instead.
To assume that common parlance with public oppinion is correct is to assume error. For someone who attempted to correct on the basis of pseudo-reasoning, this should already be in evidence. Federalist Paper No. 10 is based upon the fact that the majority can be wrong. A majority once found nothing wrong with slavery. And while I realize there are some here who will not bother to see a logical pattern, but will tie themselves up with the appearance of the word slavery rather than the use of the logical construct, it is a pattern which accurately communicates the error of assuming popular oppinion must be right.
I am fully aware also that there is a dearth in moral training in the Western World. Therefore, I would not expect those lacking specific training in ethics to easily identify ethical violation - which is socio-economic more often than political. The difference between what is lawful and what is ethical is a difference between what one can do and what one should do. Simply because any two adults may do anything together in private does not mean that they should do so. It is even more imperative in business where they, as public leaders, have an obligation to higher ethical standards of both behavior and provision of goods, services, and environment. Because they have the higher level of influence: economically, educationally, and intitutionally if they promote a caste system, elitism, etc. they are responsible for those social effects generated through those whom they affect.
To assume that common parlance with public oppinion is correct is to assume error. For someone who attempted to correct on the basis of pseudo-reasoning, this should already be in evidence. Federalist Paper No. 10 is based upon the fact that the majority can be wrong. A majority once found nothing wrong with slavery. And while I realize there are some here who will not bother to see a logical pattern, but will tie themselves up with the appearance of the word slavery rather than the use of the logical construct, it is a pattern which accurately communicates the error of assuming popular oppinion must be right.
I am fully aware also that there is a dearth in moral training in the Western World. Therefore, I would not expect those lacking specific training in ethics to easily identify ethical violation - which is socio-economic more often than political. The difference between what is lawful and what is ethical is a difference between what one can do and what one should do. Simply because any two adults may do anything together in private does not mean that they should do so. It is even more imperative in business where they, as public leaders, have an obligation to higher ethical standards of both behavior and provision of goods, services, and environment. Because they have the higher level of influence: economically, educationally, and intitutionally if they promote a caste system, elitism, etc. they are responsible for those social effects generated through those whom they affect.
jesusrunz
Run it with prepared shot, as state above.
/not signed
Brad_Dick does not approve of this proposal.
/not signed
Brad_Dick does not approve of this proposal.
Evilsod
Fitz, what the hell are you trying to prove? That you can reel off some smart sounded crap on online forums?
Your last post, all 3 paragraphs of it wasn't even related to this thread.
PS, where did you copy/paste it from?
Your last post, all 3 paragraphs of it wasn't even related to this thread.
PS, where did you copy/paste it from?
explodemyheart
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fitz Rinley
Five is a number next to four on a keyboard. An intelligent person would see that. But then an intelligent person would understand the only way for a person to ''effect'' someone else is through reproduction. Since, I am an intelligent person I have always read this as ''affect'' instead.
To assume that common parlance with public oppinion is correct is to assume error. For someone who attempted to correct on the basis of pseudo-reasoning, this should already be in evidence. Federalist Paper No. 10 is based upon the fact that the majority can be wrong. A majority once found nothing wrong with slavery. And while I realize there are some here who will not bother to see a logical pattern, but will tie themselves up with the appearance of the word slavery rather than the use of the logical construct, it is a pattern which accurately communicates the error of assuming popular oppinion must be right. I am fully aware also that there is a dearth in moral training in the Western World. Therefore, I would not expect those lacking specific training in ethics to easily identify ethical violation - which is socio-economic more often than political. The difference between what is lawful and what is ethical is a difference between what one can do and what one should do. Simply because any two adults may do anything together in private does not mean that they should do so. It is even more imperative in business where they, as public leaders, have an obligation to higher ethical standards of both behavior and provision of goods, services, and environment. Because they have the higher level of influence: economically, educationally, and intitutionally if they promote a caste system, elitism, etc. they are responsible for those social effects generated through those whom they affect. |
Curse You
Fitz, you comment on spelling, then mess up spelling a bunch of times in the following paragraphs. It doesn't matter if your finger slipped, the fact is that you can easily read over your post and check for such simple errors before posting. You're too much of a hypocrite, and you keep going off topic with your little "look at how smart I am" posts.
Who cares what "Federalist Paper No. 10" says. This is a gaming form, it's for talking about something that many people play. Skills only get changed for two reasons:
1. The majority of players find it to be too powerful/too weak
2. Arena Net finds it to be too underused.
If a single person was able to change a skill, without anyone else agreeing, the game would never work.
Concussion Shot is fine as it is. End of discussion. Can we get this thread closed already?
Who cares what "Federalist Paper No. 10" says. This is a gaming form, it's for talking about something that many people play. Skills only get changed for two reasons:
1. The majority of players find it to be too powerful/too weak
2. Arena Net finds it to be too underused.
If a single person was able to change a skill, without anyone else agreeing, the game would never work.
Concussion Shot is fine as it is. End of discussion. Can we get this thread closed already?
urania
I can easily imagine that all the people who whine about the high cost conc shot has are the people who (apparently) use it on recharge or spam it randomly to catch sth...And btw, most of prot monks use at least 1 long cast spell - either holy veil or deny hexes and if you cant hit that, then u better run sth else or go train some more.
Like Conjure Nightmare, its fine the way it is and SHOULD require additional skills to be used in same bar to make it more "spammable".
How come you aren't requesting a fix to skills like warmongers and the like though?
with the ritualist buff for weapon spells lately, the skill is even more gay than it was but no one is whining about it...i wonder why -_-. Not to mention Steady stance w/d's.
Both of the above mentioned skills have been abused in TA and partially RA for several months now, but apparently the pvp level there is too negligable for anet to even bother looking at it because they cannot even fix the (in their view) important issues that are plaguing GWs atm. -_-
Like Conjure Nightmare, its fine the way it is and SHOULD require additional skills to be used in same bar to make it more "spammable".
How come you aren't requesting a fix to skills like warmongers and the like though?
with the ritualist buff for weapon spells lately, the skill is even more gay than it was but no one is whining about it...i wonder why -_-. Not to mention Steady stance w/d's.
Both of the above mentioned skills have been abused in TA and partially RA for several months now, but apparently the pvp level there is too negligable for anet to even bother looking at it because they cannot even fix the (in their view) important issues that are plaguing GWs atm. -_-
eat-mcdonalds-and-die
Lol.
Someone must spend their life on Wikipedia or something researching crap.
Someone must spend their life on Wikipedia or something researching crap.