I'm sure someone thought this up in a shower and figured it would be the most useful thing ever. "No more scrolling! They'll all be so happy."
Pretty much the opposite.
For a real brief example, play the Venta Cemetary mission.
Notice anything?
The expanding party window -completely- covers up the "mission progress" bar when, for example, approaching a Sentry Trap. For someone who hasn't done the mission before, they'd wind up taking all kinds of damage and never even knowing why. So now I'm shifting the whole damn window over and taking up a huge chunk of screen real estate to see when I wander into their perimeter. There are other places this can happen, of course, but this is a right-from-the-start example.
One of the saving graces of the game is that pretty much every last bit of the UI can be resized and moved to wherever you want. So to now REMOVE that bit of choice - I LIKE being able to scroll down and only care about the allies, OR expand the window and see everyone at once - seems bizarre.
Please either revert this change, or introduce a simple behavior checkbox into Options/Interface to allow a player to choose (Scroll/Auto-Expand).
Revert the party window change!
1 pages • Page 1
S
T
N
/signed
if they make the UI customizable
then it should be customizable, otherwise remove the layout option from F11 all together
and why NOW, after 2 years should this be introduced
i agree 100% with the OP, even tho i dont have it in just that place im very picky about my placement and size
but like someone said, make it optional, so ppl can have autorezise if they want
dont just give us half the cookie
give us both parts pretty pls
if they make the UI customizable
then it should be customizable, otherwise remove the layout option from F11 all together
and why NOW, after 2 years should this be introduced
i agree 100% with the OP, even tho i dont have it in just that place im very picky about my placement and size
but like someone said, make it optional, so ppl can have autorezise if they want
dont just give us half the cookie
give us both parts pretty pls/not signed for a revert.
The new system is handy thanks.
For those clammoring for a revert.. how about not asking for a revert, but instead asking for a tweak, with a smile :P
ANet are listening.
Gail's full post is here fyi
The new system is handy thanks.
For those clammoring for a revert.. how about not asking for a revert, but instead asking for a tweak, with a smile :P
ANet are listening.
Gail's full post is here fyi
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Gaile Gray
Hey, guys,
The interface changes that I've seen remarked about most are the change to the party window, so that you can't extend and compress it, and the placement of the different windows. (And, sometimes, those sub-windows being resized.) We will be sure to point to this thread in the Community Summary, so that the designers can read your input on the changes. Clear, concise, I like this, I don't care for this and would suggest [this alternative] is very appreciated, as it allows the designers to read through quickly and really see the crux of your comments. ....thanks for your constructive comments and suggestions! |
Heh this very similar to my thread of about the party window here.
http://www.guildwarsguru.com/forum/s...php?t=10178510
which was made before this one.
But this one seems to of attracted more people to it.
They either revert it back, or give us that optional button, if they don't do either. I'm thinking of leaving GW, it just really screws up my mind for some reason when I attempt to play GW with it like that. Also it does not good for my custom layout.
/signed.
http://www.guildwarsguru.com/forum/s...php?t=10178510
which was made before this one.
But this one seems to of attracted more people to it.
They either revert it back, or give us that optional button, if they don't do either. I'm thinking of leaving GW, it just really screws up my mind for some reason when I attempt to play GW with it like that. Also it does not good for my custom layout.
/signed.
K

