Quote:
Originally Posted by Surena
You 300 nerds, the Corinthian helmet is overrated and just looks "badass". It limited vision and hearing and it doesn't fit in the "North African" Theme anyway - not to forget that no skirmisher would wear such a thing at all.
Next thing we lack is thrustable spears and slow-motion PvP.
|
On the contrary, it was probably one of the most effective helm designs in the history of mankind. The only drawback was limited hearing, which was fixed in later Spartan-Corinth designs by having the helmet design slope up around the ears (
example). The design was such that it would deflect a direct blow from a heavy weapon like an axe or a sword in the best of cases. Vision was excellent all-round and long, thick cheek guards made sure no light weapons would pierce the area around your throat where your vital organs were located (neck arteries and such). Remember that the ancient Greek phalangites and Hoplites fought shoulder-to-shoulder (one thing 300 actually did portray rather realistically) so the only things portruding from the massive shield wall would be hundreds of heavily armed heads resting in these Corinthian helmets and heavily armoured shin-guards portruding from underneath the shield wall. The sight of these soldiers in battle was so fearsome that later Italian legionairries wore an emblem of the famous Corinthian helmet on their own helms into battle, to instill some of that fear onto their adversaries (
example1,
example2).
Another massive advantage of these helmets was that you could actually push it back so the rear bit of it would rest on your shoulders so you wouldn't have to take it off all the time, you could just "hinge" it back like medieval-era helmet visors.