I was recently told that Dwarven armor cannot be displayed in the HoM because it is not considered a set. This is absolutey 100% rubbish! Anet you need to rethink this and allow the Dwarven armor to be displayed. It is completey unfair to those of us who worked hard to get our armor to find out afteward that we cannot display it . There is no reason for t his at all. Other professions have more than one choice on glove designs...the dwarven armor should not be any different. I am extremly angry and disappointed that I cannot display my dwarven ranger armor (with dragon gauntlets) and ask that you reconsider your decisionj to exclude us and allow us to have ours displayed.
We grinded the same rep and paid the same huge gold and material costs for the armor others get to display......we shouldnt get shafted like this.
OH and thsi mess about only destroyer weapons can be displayed? Oh come on! We should at least be able to display our end game weapons from EoTN, and the other chapters. All those empty slots.....*sighs*
This needs to be changed-Amor display
Ruby Lightheart
X Cytherea X
i read somewhere that it was not meant to be a set from the beginning. but rather a bunch of different pieces to mix with other armors.
NO WONDER NONE OF THE PARTS MATCH EACH OTHER ROFLMAO! Anet designed it that way!
it kind of makes sense, but we could have at least been informed beforehand somehow >.>
NO WONDER NONE OF THE PARTS MATCH EACH OTHER ROFLMAO! Anet designed it that way!
it kind of makes sense, but we could have at least been informed beforehand somehow >.>
Prince Rakarth
/agree
I see where youre coming from dude.
On the other hand, I play warrior and I could display my 15k glads without ever having owned the helm. I f I can show this set with a piece missing then why should the one youre reffering to be any different.
Fix it Anet!
I see where youre coming from dude.
On the other hand, I play warrior and I could display my 15k glads without ever having owned the helm. I f I can show this set with a piece missing then why should the one youre reffering to be any different.
Fix it Anet!
stiffler
Wow this is news to me, I might reconsider getting the Dwarf Armor then for my Ranger.
xArcaeus
/agree
Sucks to spend so much time and money just to get denied at the HoM.
Although I must say, it's quite ugly armor... most people wouldn't buy it anyway :P. Hope they change it so you can get it up there in all its, err, glory!
Sucks to spend so much time and money just to get denied at the HoM.
Although I must say, it's quite ugly armor... most people wouldn't buy it anyway :P. Hope they change it so you can get it up there in all its, err, glory!
LobsterMobster
As someone that ALWAYS mixes and matches armor pieces, I am not pleased with how they're handling this either.
Spazzer
10 professions, 3 armor sets each (4 for warrior): 31 sets, and a bunch of random reskin pieces for mixing and matching?
Raiin Maker
They do all have diffrent names for the set. Each piece, boots, gloves etc are named differently. This can be quite confusing when purchasing the items.