7/8 Hero Party

Wrath of m0o

Wrath of m0o

Desert Nomad

Join Date: Apr 2005

Boston Ma.

Is That Your Build[HaHa]

P/W

We have 25 Hero's now, it would be nice to be able to play PvE with a customized 7/8 Hero Party.
Not sure if this has come up before, but why cant we use a all Hero Party, is it a ballance issue?

Onarik Amrak

Onarik Amrak

Forge Runner

Join Date: Mar 2007

Astral Revenants

P/W

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wrath of m0o
We have 25 Hero's now, it would be nice to be able to play PvE with a customized 7/8 Hero Party.
Not sure if this has come up before, but why cant we use a all Hero Party, is it a ballance issue?
Like in a dozen threads. Anet said no. And that's the end of that chapter.

Winterclaw

Winterclaw

Wark!!!

Join Date: May 2005

Florida

W/

You can get a 6 hero party if you know someone who'll set up his heroes like you want them and port out.

Snow Bunny

Snow Bunny

Alcoholic From Yale

Join Date: Jul 2007

Strong Foreign Policy [sFp]

ANet won't do it

Sure would be nice though

My heroes > 90% gw playerbase.

Wrath of m0o

Wrath of m0o

Desert Nomad

Join Date: Apr 2005

Boston Ma.

Is That Your Build[HaHa]

P/W

Yeah, we do that all the time..
Just would be fun to run some builds that could utalize all these hero's i own.

MithranArkanere

MithranArkanere

Underworld Spelunker

Join Date: Nov 2006

wikipedia.org/wiki/Vigo

Heraldos de la Llama Oscura [HLO]

E/

Never going to happen.

Is one of those things that anets says NO, and just NO.

Dronte

Dronte

Grotto Attendant

Join Date: Sep 2006

And I totally agree with Anet.

Skyy High

Skyy High

Furnace Stoker

Join Date: May 2006

R/

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wrath of m0o
We have 25 Hero's now, it would be nice to be able to play PvE with a customized 7/8 Hero Party.
Not sure if this has come up before, but why cant we use a all Hero Party, is it a ballance issue?
Not sure if it's come up before? I think the rock you're hiding under may be able to blot out the sun...

Antheus

Forge Runner

Join Date: Jan 2006

I used to support Anet's decision on that, but recently found I just don't care anymore.

PvE is broken enough since GW:EN came out, and any talk of balance, community or grouping is just redundant.

They might as well do it.

Phoenix Tears

Phoenix Tears

Desert Nomad

Join Date: Feb 2007

im for it, group play has never existed from the begin on in this MMO, GW is imo no MMO, and was never, because no MMO would have Heroes or Henchmen, an real MMO would only make content, that must be done by pure player parties ...

Would Anet imlement ful hero parties, nothing would change in the game ...
everybody, that played mostly only before the change will still play only with heroes, btw improved and stupid unimproved npc's ...

Anet's should stop forcing people to dictate players, how they have to play. Thats simple childish. We payed the money for the games, so also want we decice for ourself, if we want to play the god damn game all by us alone , or together with others ...

People, which want to play with other, will then search PvE Guilds and play them together with Guild Mates, thats the reason of 2, why PVE Guilds EXIST.
Implementing full hero parties wil not means, that 4 Million players will change from Day X to Day Y to play only with full heroes only and never anymore with players ...

Anet says, that people with 7 heroes would get an advantage over parties with only 3 heroes ... lol, that the god damn dumbest reson I've ever heard.
Would anet have made only for 2 cents self a compare of both things for exampple in one of GW:EN dungeons, best example > shards of orr, cause this dungeon is ya so extreeeeeeme nice.

then anet would have seen, that their reason is bullshit, even with 6 heroes/2 player you stand only very hardly a chance there, even when all 6 heroes are monks, because the mosnters simple can nuke your butt and make you look like beginners.
Thats one type of place, where you get forced to play with full player party, to have a normal chance to beat this dungeon, without ending in thousands of full party wipes,where you have to use every 10 minutes one stone of power to erase ur whole party stupid imba malus of -60%, while you can be happy, when u reach 10% morale there before.

7 heroe parties would ABSOLUTELY NEVER be imbalanced, how coult it, when GW:EN is still the imbast thing of the whole game series, where the normal mode is like 3 times harder, then any HM of any campaign before.
I see it coming, when anet brings GW:En HM, where we have then to fight vs. 300% more monster which have all like 33% higher max level, and we still stand at dumb lvl 20, have still to fight all those masses only with 8 people and we will receive damage of 450 when those monsters stroke out their almighty p...... of might, when we talk of imbanesss, where exist still in NM enemies, which can do easily 350 damage with normal hits ... *zynic sarcasm*


people which agree with anet are are imo only dumb fanboys, which have no clue about, what would be better for the game, who might think only maybe in this point

"what anet does, will be ever 200% right" and something like "anet makes never failures" -.-

who believes ...

This is no whine, this.... IS ...... TRUUUUUUUUUUUUUTH

(XD ahh needed this little joke > 300 absolutely cool film *g*)

odly

Krytan Explorer

Join Date: Jan 2006

N/

/signed

/sighed

If I had to choose I would prefer to have my 3 hero's use PvE only skills though. And that would probably be easier to implement since they don't need to change the interface for it.

moriz

moriz

??ber t??k-n??sh'??n

Join Date: Jan 2006

Canada

R/

the current party system simply cannot support a single player with 7 heroes. that has been confirmed by gaile gray.

in other words, it's not happening.

Sleeper Service

Sleeper Service

Jungle Guide

Join Date: Dec 2005

CULT

2 players join with 3 heroes each. one leaves, you control 6 heroes.

impossible huh.

Faer

Faer

La-Li-Lu-Le-Lo

Join Date: Feb 2006

The development team, through Gaile (and possibly Andrew), has said it isn't going to happen. Ever. Additionally, I believe they stated that they don't want to discuss it again. So, in that light...

Locked, because it isn't going to go anywhere.