Okay, I've read abit about the survivor track and everything and it says on guildwiki you MUST have 0 deaths.
Does that mean on my character I can't achieve this title becuase when I typed /death it comes up with 397 lol.
So what I'm wondering is if I gain the required amount of XP with my death counter as it is still at 397 do I get the track, or is it that it MUST be 0 deaths?
Thanks for your time.
Question about the survivor track
ThisIsMadness
Savio
Nope, you must be at 0 deaths to get Survivor.
free_fall
Yes, 0 deaths. You'll need to make a new character if you want to try for the title.
There's been some talk about Anet possibly doing something along the lines you mentioned - getting the required amount of XP without dying - to give those people who've been playing since Proph (before titles were introduced) a chance to earn that title, but I don't think that's going to happen.
There's been some talk about Anet possibly doing something along the lines you mentioned - getting the required amount of XP without dying - to give those people who've been playing since Proph (before titles were introduced) a chance to earn that title, but I don't think that's going to happen.
Griff Mon
Quote:
Originally Posted by free_fall
There's been some talk about Anet possibly doing something along the lines you mentioned - getting the required amount of XP without dying - to give those people who've been playing since Proph (before titles were introduced) a chance to earn that title, but I don't think that's going to happen.
|
Holly Herro
Agree with poster above.
free_fall
Yes, I should have clarified that there's been some talk on the forum here, though I seem to recall that talk was generated by some comments from Anet, which could have been nothing more than the usual "we're looking into it" brush-off.
HawkofStorms
Quote:
Originally Posted by free_fall
Yes, I should have clarified that there's been some talk on the forum here, though I seem to recall that talk was generated by some comments from Anet, which could have been nothing more than the usual "we're looking into it" brush-off.
|
As far as I know, a.net has never actaully addressed this, though it seems unlikely they will change it any time soon.