An Idea for Community Relations as far as Updates
Sneaky Mcsneaksneak
Now, as we all know, many of the Anet staff have their own pages or accounts here, on the GW official wiki, and on other GW related sites, and listen to the community about what should be done. But sometimes things are implemented that scrape against the community. I'm not saying for special events (I love some of the holiday surprises.), but for gameplay in general.
What I think should happen is a voting system on available updates. Either on the Guild Wars site and is linked to player accounts, or directly in-game.
This could make updates come in a predictable fashion and allow much faster player feedback. I would say the best would be a bi-monthly period (every two weeks.)
It should have a list of upcoming updates to skills and gameplay changes, and allow the community to vote on whether they want that update implemented or not. It would also have the past period's updates and the chance to repeal them, but whether they are repealed or not, after one period's time, that change becomes a locked topic for at least 6 periods.
An example:
Skill: Spinal Shivers/Shivers of Dread. Hex Spell. For X...Y seconds, whenever target foe is struck for cold damage while using a skill, that foe is interrupted and you lose Z...A Energy or Spinal Shivers/Shivers of Dread ends.
Change to: Spinal Shivers/Shivers of Dread. Hex Spell. For B...C seconds, whenever target foe is struck for cold damage while using a skill, that foe is interrupted and you lose D...E Energy or Spinal Shivers/Shivers of Dread ends.
Then two buttons to vote, Change. and Do Not Change.
Though I do realize it would be a large project, it would be an immense step forward in community relations, and could be promoted in the same way the Xunlai House was. An in-game announcement, NPC's, anything to make people want to influence the game and make their voice count.
The one thing I have to stress is that it MUST somehow be linked back to player accounts, so that one player can not vote more than once on the same topic.
I hope this is implemented in some form if not in GW, then in GW2. I believe it would be a great step in the right direction.
What I think should happen is a voting system on available updates. Either on the Guild Wars site and is linked to player accounts, or directly in-game.
This could make updates come in a predictable fashion and allow much faster player feedback. I would say the best would be a bi-monthly period (every two weeks.)
It should have a list of upcoming updates to skills and gameplay changes, and allow the community to vote on whether they want that update implemented or not. It would also have the past period's updates and the chance to repeal them, but whether they are repealed or not, after one period's time, that change becomes a locked topic for at least 6 periods.
An example:
Skill: Spinal Shivers/Shivers of Dread. Hex Spell. For X...Y seconds, whenever target foe is struck for cold damage while using a skill, that foe is interrupted and you lose Z...A Energy or Spinal Shivers/Shivers of Dread ends.
Change to: Spinal Shivers/Shivers of Dread. Hex Spell. For B...C seconds, whenever target foe is struck for cold damage while using a skill, that foe is interrupted and you lose D...E Energy or Spinal Shivers/Shivers of Dread ends.
Then two buttons to vote, Change. and Do Not Change.
Though I do realize it would be a large project, it would be an immense step forward in community relations, and could be promoted in the same way the Xunlai House was. An in-game announcement, NPC's, anything to make people want to influence the game and make their voice count.
The one thing I have to stress is that it MUST somehow be linked back to player accounts, so that one player can not vote more than once on the same topic.
I hope this is implemented in some form if not in GW, then in GW2. I believe it would be a great step in the right direction.
Loviatar
[QUOTE]
NO !
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sneaky Mcsneaksneak
What I think should happen is a voting system on available updates. Either on the Guild Wars site and is linked to player accounts, or directly in-game.
This could make updates come in a predictable fashion and allow much faster player feedback. I would say the best would be a bi-monthly period (every two weeks.) It should have a list of upcoming updates to skills and gameplay changes, and allow the community to vote on whether they want that update implemented or not. It would also have the past period's updates and the chance to repeal them, but whether they are repealed or not, after one period's time, that change becomes a locked topic for at least 6 periods. |
Alicendre
I don't think it's a good idea.
Most people wouldn't want to nerf that overpowered skill they use in RA...
Most people wouldn't want to nerf that overpowered skill they use in RA...
Alex Morningstar
/not signed
In the case of Guild Wars, the majority of the players definately do not know what it best. As for 'community' inside of Guild Wars, it's lacking. To say something scrapes against a community of people that do not interact with each other unless they are guildies/allies or calling someone a noob is an amusing idea at best.
This community has no direction, has no common purpose and has no goal other than to get more gold, get farther in the game, get better armor and weapons and rise in the ranks of the ladder of what is acceptable by their peers. If anything changes something in how these are attained, there is bitching. Otherwise, no one cares.
Example: When party windows came out. No one used them.
In the case of Guild Wars, the majority of the players definately do not know what it best. As for 'community' inside of Guild Wars, it's lacking. To say something scrapes against a community of people that do not interact with each other unless they are guildies/allies or calling someone a noob is an amusing idea at best.
This community has no direction, has no common purpose and has no goal other than to get more gold, get farther in the game, get better armor and weapons and rise in the ranks of the ladder of what is acceptable by their peers. If anything changes something in how these are attained, there is bitching. Otherwise, no one cares.
Example: When party windows came out. No one used them.
Lonesamurai
another big resounding...
NO!
Saphrium
I am not pretending to be a paragon, but I echo the "NO!"
PureEvilYak
Arcane Mimicry, Arcane Echo, Echo, NO!!!, Echo, NO!!!, NO!!!
Vocal Minority = Baaaaaaad.
Vocal Minority = Baaaaaaad.
Age
Gaming isn't a democracey on Yeahs and Nays as well button wouldn't work on a board to vote with.
Red Sonya
Lol /unsigned ain't gonna happen bud. When you allow the whole community to vote on something it will screw up so much of the game it wouldn't be the same game anymore. LOL what a rediculous stupid idea in the first place.
pamelf
Besides, the majority of the community aren't represented on these forums. Should only forum dwellers get a chance to vote on the way the game develops?
/unsigned
/unsigned
Sleeper Service
interesting democratic approach to the problem.
unfortunately democracy is a lie.
Constant skill changes are BAD, last thing we need is Anet making the players believe that its their fault.
unfortunately democracy is a lie.
Constant skill changes are BAD, last thing we need is Anet making the players believe that its their fault.
Gonzo
No!
123456789
123456789
legion_rat
NO!!!
assume that there are 12 characters
~the rat~
assume that there are 12 characters
~the rat~
IslandHermet
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alicendre
I don't think it's a good idea.
Most people wouldn't want to nerf that overpowered skill they use in RA... |
change pvp overpowered skill X to balanced skill Y
vote yes-70%
vote no-30%,total pvp player base all useing the overpowered skill (just a example) in reality not all pvpers use the cookie cutter builds
it would be pritty out numbered considering the large difference of PVE and PVP player base, they would have to implimint a seperate voteing system for pvp and pve.
but as for the overpowered combos that people use would not stand a chance in this kind of a voteing process.
I do not agree with this method but it is a very nice idea one of the few that come up on GURU, but democracy is a lie.
In a true democratic society this would work but their are no True democratic society's .
IslandHermet
Quote:
Originally Posted by pamelf
Besides, the majority of the community aren't represented on these forums. Should only forum dwellers get a chance to vote on the way the game develops?
/unsigned |
it is always a good thing to fully read the posts.
pamelf
Quote:
Originally Posted by IslandHermet
his post clearly states account based voteing so you cannot vote twice.
it is always a good thing to fully read the posts. |
HawkofStorms
/notsigned
People are idiots and self-centered and would never get rid of overpowered builds.
People are idiots and self-centered and would never get rid of overpowered builds.
Amon Warrior
We suggest / complain / are the feedback providers
They listen / consider what we say / are the decision makers
No problem here...
They listen / consider what we say / are the decision makers
No problem here...
Div
Any buffs: Change
Any nerfs: Not change
That'll pretty much be the system there for most players.
Any nerfs: Not change
That'll pretty much be the system there for most players.