Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Vale Todo
That would make a great read, any links to this tread?
|
I believe he is refering to thechunkymonkey from the duping hack a while back. There wasn't a single thread where you can get all of it,
here is a link to his posts.
Effectively no one believed in the dupe to begin with, he was one of the first to post a screen of a large number of armbraces in the trade window. After a few people asking who he was trading with someone noticed that the screen was *his* trade window, not viewing what someone else had put in there. While he initially claimed the screen as his own he eventually said he got it from someone else.
Then, of course the duping was confirmed and the Bans started and he was one of them. There were quite a few "I didn't do it" posts, his amongst them (in fact, Anet sent him a fairly nasty e-mail telling him to leave them alone, the ban stays). In the end there was enough evidence in his forum posts that it turned out he was one of the main two dupers that were flooding the market and trying to make crazy trades (I don't recall if he finally admitted it or not, I seem to recall him doing so - at the least one of his cohorts did so). He was trying to gain sympathy and get his ban removed through the forums.
That episode was also one of those times where many "innocent" people were banned. The two main dupers gave away stacks and stacks and stacks of armbraces to their fellow guild mates - those people got a ban and no lifting of it. They also purchased items for crazy amounts - a Kuunavang for 5 stacks of armbraces. In some sense they were right - they didn't dupe, however if someone offers to give you ten stacks of ecto and 10 stacks of armbraces you should know something is wrong. This is like your next door neighbor offering everyone in the subdivision twice the Gross National Product of the US - the feds are still going to arrest you for counterfeiting. Not only that, but if you are taking trades in those items and in those quantities you *know* what you are getting - they didn't ban people who did "fair" trades (I'm fairly certain I purchased a duped Ranger Elite Tome, though I can't know for sure) for the duped items (or if they did they later over turned them - they were pretty heavy handed, for a good reason, at the start).
I find most bans that people are "innocent" take one of the above two forms - outright lieing or they convinced themselves that while they have a large stack of ill gotten gains that since they didn't actually do it (they probably blinked while it was going on and didn't know) it will not count. Doesn't work in real life and doesn't work here either. But then, it doesn't take watching much of even people who are willing to on TV (and how angry they are after the judge chews them out and they loose) to realize that they probably also think that works in real life.
People should look at Anet admitting someone got ban happy as a good thing - not that someone did that but that they are willing to be honest when they had no requirement to do so (and given how embarrassing it had to be to admit it).