im sorry but i find it unfair that only rangers get to have pets its an unfair advantage i mean i love having pets in-game with me(WoW) but i hate the ranger class (sorry rangers no offence) i just like playing the role of mages.
cant anet just give the animal charm spell to every profession?
or at least give every1 pets for guild wars 2.
or just let us put minipets in the hall of monuments so in gw2 it comes back all grown up and combat ready.
only rangers get pets ahh >:(
warcrap
placebo overdose
wait for it omg this game has /x so you can be a ele/ranger and have your little pet with no use what so ever but to each his own
warcrap
im an elementalist/mesmer
Halmyr
mini-pet maybe?
/not signed
each class have there unique skills, go /ranger if you want a fighting pet
/not signed
each class have there unique skills, go /ranger if you want a fighting pet
Saraphim
Having a pet is an unfair advantage? Erm.. no, because if you want an effective pet you need to invest enough attribute points to do so, reducing your damage elsewhere. It's called balance. 
My ele sometimes goes out with her moa, and by pulling one point out of E-storage she can just about sustain a pet, but it does bugger all damage. It's just a fun build for mapping with. She still has to go E/R though, which is as it should be.
My ele sometimes goes out with her moa, and by pulling one point out of E-storage she can just about sustain a pet, but it does bugger all damage. It's just a fun build for mapping with. She still has to go E/R though, which is as it should be.
Tyla
failed thread.
warcrap,rangers are attoned to nature - and that is why they can have pets.
whats next an armour plated guy who isnt making adjustments to nature to be able to charm a pet just like that?
warcrap,rangers are attoned to nature - and that is why they can have pets.
whats next an armour plated guy who isnt making adjustments to nature to be able to charm a pet just like that?
Woop Shotty
If you got your wish, it would be pointless. You can't give every non-ranger (primary and secondary) charm animal without making the pet deal no damage, not be a target, and not clip. Oh, and although I'd be all for bringing my rainbow phoenix everywhere with me (as Mo/X) just for appearances, I can think of much better skills for slot 8.
placebo overdose
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by tyla salanari
failed thread.
warcrap,rangers are attoned to nature - and that is why they can have pets. whats next an armour plated guy who isnt making adjustments to nature to be able to charm a pet just like that? |
HawkofStorms
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by warcrap
im an elementalist/mesmer
|
Tyla
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by placebo overdose
no what is next is heavy armored eles and minionmaster assasins
|
xD
RSGashapon
I love vetted WoWers who come over to the light side with nary a clue.
wetsparks
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by placebo overdose
no what is next is heavy armored eles and minionmaster assasins
|
Isileth
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by warcrap
im sorry but i find it unfair that only rangers get to have pets its an unfair advantage
|
Its not fair warriors get Dragon Slash, give it to everyone.
Its not an unfair advantage, its part of that proffesion.
They are meant to be different and do different things.
genofreek
Different classes do different things. Elementalists set fire to things, necromancers raise the dead, dervishes do the most AoE melee damage. If every class was all much of a muchness, GW would be boring as hell and the differences between classes would only be cosmetic.
Make a new Ranger character, or unlock /R as your secondary. You can do that a bit later in any campaign. I guarantee going E/R is going to cripple your attack power, though. Pets demand a pretty big investment of att points, skill slots to keep them up and running, and if they die your skills are temporarily disabled.
/notsigned, as far as I'm concerned the rangers can keep Charm Animal.
Make a new Ranger character, or unlock /R as your secondary. You can do that a bit later in any campaign. I guarantee going E/R is going to cripple your attack power, though. Pets demand a pretty big investment of att points, skill slots to keep them up and running, and if they die your skills are temporarily disabled.
/notsigned, as far as I'm concerned the rangers can keep Charm Animal.
You can't see me
/Not Signed
Your secondary profession can be changed, and Beast Mastery is not a prime attribute.
Major Fail.
Your secondary profession can be changed, and Beast Mastery is not a prime attribute.
Major Fail.
RPGmaniac
Is it unfair that only Hunters and Warlocks get some sort of pet in WoW? At least in GW there IS a way for mages to get a pet. Switch to /R later in the game and bring a pet if you want to.
Off-topic: while looking on WoW's website to double check that above fact, I found out Blizzard is merging with Activision.
Plus if pets were so unfair, everybody in HA and GvG would have beastmaster builds. Pets aren't really effective for combat (albeit a couple builds). They're more of a cosmetic thing.
Off-topic: while looking on WoW's website to double check that above fact, I found out Blizzard is merging with Activision.
Plus if pets were so unfair, everybody in HA and GvG would have beastmaster builds. Pets aren't really effective for combat (albeit a couple builds). They're more of a cosmetic thing.
mrmango
Close idiocy please.
silv3rr
Why is it every single one of your posts are all impending fails??
But since we're at it... I want them to allow 8 profession classes...
I wanna be a, W/A/R/Rt/Me/Mo/Ele/Nec... I'll be a jack of all trades.
But since we're at it... I want them to allow 8 profession classes...
I wanna be a, W/A/R/Rt/Me/Mo/Ele/Nec... I'll be a jack of all trades.
Div
Why do only warriors have swordsmanship. I want my sin to have it too. And what about my battle mage elementalist. Wow, sad threads being started here.
Lady Raenef
/notsigned.
No.
No.
Operative 14
My first character was an E/R, I got to have a pet and didn't have to use any other Ranger skills than Charm Animal and Comfort Animal. If you don't like Rangers, that's fine. However, there's nothing that says that if you want to play as a 'mage' but have a pet, you have to trade in your fire staff for a bow and start hugging trees.
Zinger314
I have a 70 Warlock in WoW. I hate having pets. My Imp is merely a Dark Pact bank, I rarely use others.
If you really want a Pet as a Mage, spec 41 Frost.
Pets for every class makes least sense of anything you have posted.
If you really want a Pet as a Mage, spec 41 Frost.
Pets for every class makes least sense of anything you have posted.
Mike_version2
this idea is almost as bad as buying gold from the in game store...
/notsigned
/notsigned
nightwatchman
/notsigned
.
.
Stormlord Alex
lololol
/notsigned
/notsigned
Cebe
This sounds like a big ol' rant to me. "Only" Rangers can have pets in the same way "Only" Ritualists can have Binding Rituals. Anyone else can use them, but more often than not you'll be pretty useless with them.
If everyone had pets I'd be willing to bet they'd have no more use than a minipet. A Ranger's pet is it's weapon...when a Ranger plays beastmaster, it is using the pet to fight, while the use of his/her bow is vastly decreased.
If everyone had pets I'd be willing to bet they'd have no more use than a minipet. A Ranger's pet is it's weapon...when a Ranger plays beastmaster, it is using the pet to fight, while the use of his/her bow is vastly decreased.