So I was looking up stuff on the official wiki, when I came acorss the article on Guild Wars: Utopia, the scrapped plan for C4. Now, reading it makes me think Anet coulda done better with EotN.
According to the article, one of the classes might have been a Chronomancer, a red mage type of character (in other words, a wizard who controls time). How cool would that be? That alone excites me!!
The Aztec type thing is what GW needed. The real life Aztecs were awesome enough, but GW versions of them would be ub3r 1337 pwn4g3 too! Huge pyramids with giant bosses on top of them, sparwling marketplaces bigger than Lions Arch, etc.
But the thing that interests me mostis the melee polearms, the one-handed maces, and the dual wielding of swords, axes, and spears, and even mounts (though I'm not so hyped about the latter). I'd much rather like more dual wielding capabilities and melee spears (though scythes are kinda like that) then dungeons. And, in Utopia, dungeons coulda been implemented too!
Now we are assuming alot about Utopia just from concept art and vague descriptions. But, IMO, all this sounds a helluva lot better then what we got in EotN. I'd like Gaile or someone to tell us more about what Utopia might have been like to see if im blowing what it coulda been out of proportion.
The main question here, would you have rather seen Utopia then EotN? I would.
You can read about Guild Wars: Utopia here.
