Hi all,
Based on my discussion thread here:
http://www.guildwarsguru.com/forum/s...php?t=10233848
I decided to post a suggestion. Allow us to choose the rank of a title that we wish to display, as long as it is lower than what we have achieved.
For example, If you want to max your Deldrimoor rank, but you like the sound of Epic Delver vs. Legendary Delver this would allow you to display that title even if you maxed it. Someone with Font of Wisdom could still choose to display Seeker of Wisdom etc...
This seems pretty harmless to me and it's just for fun...
Make lower rank titles available to display
Shadow Spirit
MithranArkanere
If you are level 20 you can't show level 15.
If you are a warrior can't show paragon.
Things that 'are' are the things 'shown'. Why to change that?
If you are Legendary Delver you are not Epic Delver, you are Legendary Delver.
If you are a warrior can't show paragon.
Things that 'are' are the things 'shown'. Why to change that?
If you are Legendary Delver you are not Epic Delver, you are Legendary Delver.
Fried Tech
sorry /notsigned. I would never want to show a lower title than what i have.
Pyro maniac
Want to show my survivor(1) title on my warrior and then start PUG'ing with a Healing Hands build
only reason I could think off the idea would be nice
other then that
/notsigned
only reason I could think off the idea would be nice
other then that
/notsigned
Floski
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fried Tech
sorry /notsigned. I would never want to show a lower title than what i have.
|
Halmyr
Theres a litle number beside every titled displayed. The higher it is, the better.
As long as that number stay at the rank you are, I see no problem with it.
/signed
As long as that number stay at the rank you are, I see no problem with it.
/signed
Drop of Fear
always wanted to show *charmed* again...
don't see such an update coming, but /signed
don't see such an update coming, but /signed
onerabbit
Epic Delver > legendary Delver.
/signed.
/signed.
Skyy High
I can't see a reason why this would hurt, but at the same time I can't see them uncoupling the "title level" and "title displayed" for something this useless to so many people.
DarkGanni
As the OP said its just for fun and its not harmless at all
/signed
/signed
Limu Tolkki
/notsigned
No point.
No point.
intarwebs
Actually, Epic delver and Legendary Delver should be turned around.
Peter Panic
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by intarwebs
Actually, Epic delver and Legendary Delver should be turned around.
|
o and off topic, i think r9 asura should be "Not Too Epic"
Onarik Amrak
I don't really see the point...
/signed anyway, it doesn't hurt anyone.
/signed anyway, it doesn't hurt anyone.
genofreek
It's been suggested before, and I'll /sign again because I like the idea of retroactive titles. Charmed > Lucky.
Floski
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Limu Tolkki
/notsigned
No point. |
Please, use the gray matter before posting such useless responses.
Phoenix Tears
signed..
i would find this especially for the norn title absolute cool, because the higher ones get more and more crappier sounding...so higher you get..
When I'm maxed with the norn title..I personall<y would like to stay showing "Demon Slayer" ...at least one title rank name..that sounds from all norn ranks most coolest and can also be used good in RPG ^^
just let stay the number in () then at the max..so people can see. if someone is only the low rank..or if someone is maxed and shows only the lower rank cause of personal better likings.
i would find this especially for the norn title absolute cool, because the higher ones get more and more crappier sounding...so higher you get..
When I'm maxed with the norn title..I personall<y would like to stay showing "Demon Slayer" ...at least one title rank name..that sounds from all norn ranks most coolest and can also be used good in RPG ^^
just let stay the number in () then at the max..so people can see. if someone is only the low rank..or if someone is maxed and shows only the lower rank cause of personal better likings.