Increase heroes to 3 to.... MAX.
PinoyRurik
Hello, is it just me or having only a maximum of 3 heroes is kinda annoying.
dont get me wrong i think having heroes at all is pretty cool, it always beat having any henchman in the group but only 3 at a time...! come on A.net! If your ever going to higher lvl areas (party numbers 6 - 12) i think we should be able to have all heroes in the party.
Why?
1. lets face it, we only lvl and equip the monk/warrior/ele heroes. if a.net increased the max heroes in a party, we can find usage for other heroes.
2. not all outpost have people in them, especially the least known one.
3. heroes can play better than some noobs. no really.
4. greater control in skills and strategy than with henchmans.
/sign
dont get me wrong i think having heroes at all is pretty cool, it always beat having any henchman in the group but only 3 at a time...! come on A.net! If your ever going to higher lvl areas (party numbers 6 - 12) i think we should be able to have all heroes in the party.
Why?
1. lets face it, we only lvl and equip the monk/warrior/ele heroes. if a.net increased the max heroes in a party, we can find usage for other heroes.
2. not all outpost have people in them, especially the least known one.
3. heroes can play better than some noobs. no really.
4. greater control in skills and strategy than with henchmans.
/sign
MithranArkanere
Do not waste your time.
This is one of the rotund 'noes' of Anet.
This is one of the rotund 'noes' of Anet.
You can't see me
/Suggested many, many times.
/Multiple discussion threads in Riverside.
The argument usually goes where most people sign it, but the people who think that PuGing is not dead already try to cling to the aspect that this would ruin the social aspect of the game. BS? maybe, but that's their argument.
That should save about 20 pages of flaming and redudancy.
I'd sign, but this is just another duplicate of several I've signed already.
/Multiple discussion threads in Riverside.
The argument usually goes where most people sign it, but the people who think that PuGing is not dead already try to cling to the aspect that this would ruin the social aspect of the game. BS? maybe, but that's their argument.
That should save about 20 pages of flaming and redudancy.
I'd sign, but this is just another duplicate of several I've signed already.
PinoyRurik
oh lol, did not know.
this is now CLOSED!
I SHALL NOT BE FLAMED!
this is now CLOSED!
I SHALL NOT BE FLAMED!
MithranArkanere
Hey, I'm not against it, but Anet will never do it.
It's just that.
It's just that.
wetsparks
As mentioned, brought up several times before and it doesn't look like it will ever change. And not everyone does the "holy trinity" thing with the tank/ele/monk heroes. My warrior heroes were the last I got to level 20, right after assassin and dervish heroes.
Tha Dukk
Quote:
Originally Posted by PinoyRurik
1. lets face it, we only lvl and equip the monk/warrior/ele heroes. if a.net
|
chowmein69
its not gonna happen .
Kanyatta
PvE doesn't need to be made any easier than it already is, you can already go in with just about nothing on your bar, with 7 henchmen, no heroes, and still beat about 90% of HM, as long as you don't over agro.
Stupid Shizno
it should happen. i trust my heros more the pug and guild members. now with uber micromanagement of heros, i trust them even more.
pve = 7 heros allowed
pvp should have no heros allowed, or hench (unless someone drops)
pve = 7 heros allowed
pvp should have no heros allowed, or hench (unless someone drops)
Stupid Shizno
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kanyatta
PvE doesn't need to be made any easier than it already is, you can already go in with just about nothing on your bar, with 7 henchmen, no heroes, and still beat about 90% of HM, as long as you don't over agro.
|
anet has already shown they dumbed down pve to retards and 10year olds.
and im pretty sure, you cant vanquish 4man team with 3 hench. screenshot or it didnt happen. (and 4man areas are more then 10%)
PinoyRurik
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stupid Shizno
yet you want ursan blessing?
anet has already shown they dumbed down pve to retards and 10year olds. and im pretty sure, you cant vanquish 4man team with 3 hench. screenshot or it didnt happen. (and 4man areas are more then 10%) |
Steboy93
This idea has been done to death, sadly it ain't going to happen.
gremlin
Just wanted to add before this is closed.
How the heck does anyone know what arenanet will or will not do
They seldom if ever say anything about questions asked and suggestions made and certainly never give a statement one way or the other about same.
Yet time after time someone will say "arenanet will never do it"
Well I say if your so smart about what they will not do are you equally as smart about what they will do ?
If so post a list of all of them it will save us a lot of posts
How the heck does anyone know what arenanet will or will not do
They seldom if ever say anything about questions asked and suggestions made and certainly never give a statement one way or the other about same.
Yet time after time someone will say "arenanet will never do it"
Well I say if your so smart about what they will not do are you equally as smart about what they will do ?
If so post a list of all of them it will save us a lot of posts
Darkobra
Quote:
Originally Posted by gremlin
Just wanted to add before this is closed.
How the heck does anyone know what arenanet will or will not do They seldom if ever say anything about questions asked and suggestions made and certainly never give a statement one way or the other about same. Yet time after time someone will say "arenanet will never do it" Well I say if your so smart about what they will not do are you equally as smart about what they will do ? If so post a list of all of them it will save us a lot of posts |
Reason
+1 before thread close!
Seriously though, A-net has already given a explanation as to why this is 101% out of the question, it boils down to how they feel that it would destroy the mechanics of the game blah blah blah...
Seriously though, A-net has already given a explanation as to why this is 101% out of the question, it boils down to how they feel that it would destroy the mechanics of the game blah blah blah...
tmr819
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kanyatta
PvE doesn't need to be made any easier than it already is, you can already go in with just about nothing on your bar, with 7 henchmen, no heroes, and still beat about 90% of HM, as long as you don't over agro.
|
I am in favor of being able to use more Heroes just because I'd like to use them more and experiment with a wider variety of AI combinations; for me, this is more about making the game more fun (by providing more options) than about making things easier.
quickmonty
I'd like to be able to use more than 3 heroes, but it's all been said before:
A discussion on 7 heros
Why have 25 heros to use 3 at a time?
Also, at the top of this forum:
http://www.guildwarsguru.com/forum/s...d.php?t=116806
A discussion on 7 heros
Why have 25 heros to use 3 at a time?
Also, at the top of this forum:
http://www.guildwarsguru.com/forum/s...d.php?t=116806
Quote:
Always use the search button before posting a new thread to see if your ideas been suggested before. |
Undivine
Quote:
Originally Posted by PinoyRurik
oh lol, did not know.
this is now CLOSED! I SHALL NOT BE FLAMED! |