Hunter of Quest title!!

/signed
Maybe split it into 4 titles and 1 maxed like legendary guardian. Tyrian Quest Hunter, Factions Quest Hunter, Elonian Quest Hunter, Eye of the North Quest Hunter, and Legendary Quest hunter.

Yes, please.

/notsigned

Though this seems like a good idea, it'll be hard to implement unless certain things are put into place (like quests on istan, shing jea island, and before LA wouldn't count because that would screw up foreign chars, cap sig quests could be awkward, campaign specific stuff in general.)

/signed

Love the idea.

i would already have the title for tyria and very close on th eother two chapters.

i agree this title will benefit the game the quite alot beecause it would also lead to completion of other titles like the explorer title, and sunspear and lightbringer

don't agree with the Eye of the North quest hunter because there's no title for exporer or protector of the north. It all goes to your adventurer of the north title track including the quests....

/not signed

I did every quest I saw, but I still missed some, plus not all quests are available to all classes, plus when you move your char from one campaign to another not all quests are available.. logistical and programming nightmare. I'd rather see that kind of work put into gw2.

For this reason.

/not singned

*it's impossible to track the quests done before, some quests changed over time, some were seasonal or event connected
*also some professions have more quests than others
*also characters starting in different campagins have access to completely different number of quests inaccessible to characters from another campagins
*there are also many quests which should not be finished because of farming opportunities.

Title like this is not needed, better increase quest rewards or something.

- It's not impossible. It's already done. You cannot take a quest again because thay have a variable in your character that tags it as 'already made the quest'.
- Yup, that's because this title WON'T count Tutorial quests:
*NO tutorial quests, profession speciic nor campaign exclusive quests. That is, most quests before Lion's Arch, The Market and Consulate docks.
*Repeatable quests would count once (Like EotN repeatale quests ALREADY do in the Master of the North title).
*Although Anet is not against player farming, they won't support it either. So who cares? Want to keep the farming? Don't get the title. There are also missions that change things, like making Zen Daijun. Will you stop making it to be able to kill the Kirin that only appear in there and some low-end afflicted? That's your choice.

I answered other because i think i t is a clever idea but what about pre-searing quests when it takes 30 secs to complete the first 3 quests. If this was made people would do that easy beginner quests they never did and besides what if I want it on my warrior and he already did to many quests. I thin in theory its a good idea, it would just need to be refined more. Maybe a title tracking the xp u get from quests, but then they do factions. I think it would work but it would need to be more specific.

Y not.. It's not like the game suffers to have more reasons to participate.

/signed

/signed, but only if it can be given retrospectively. I make my characters do all the quests, so most of them are done or close to it already. XD

All achievemnt titles were given retroactively.
That's because they are based upon making something once. And since 'quests done' data is already stored, like missiones done or map explored or skils learned, it can be done.

I'm so glad we have a programmer on these forums to tell us exactly what the game tracks and doesn't track. I wouldn't make any assumptions about what the game "knows" about our characters; if this title were feasible, I would imagine it would have been done by now.

So /notsigned, just because I can't see it as something easily done.

So, tell me, how come tat you cannot make again some quests with differnt characters if it's not by setting flags to store such data?

Mystically? How is it done si secondary. The more important it's i it must be dune, and it must.


Just using logic, you'll know that It can be done in a slightly harder way than Protector and Guardians, and easier than Master of the North.

So you saying you dont' want it because it would theorically hard to implement? We payd them to play the game, they gotta do their work. Furthemore as the guy you quoted is not a programmer , you also are not; it could be easily done or hardly done, nobody of us (I guess) really knows.

a Title for every quest done in HM and NM!

I agree only if there is someway to see which quests you have completed.

Impossible, can only do a quest once so both in NM and NM would be impossible.

/signed

would be cool

Quests are one-shot.

It's like Carthographer, it doens't matter the mode.

Uhmm the problem is:

1. There are many quests that you can repeat!
2. There are too many quests in this game. Keep tracks of all of those will be a hard-project for Anet. Yes that means they are more likely won't do it. Assuming you are in their position. Ty!
3. There are quests for event only! If you count, you gotta count it too.
4. Quests number are not fixed. It comes more and more as more ideas come out. Yes that means you can not max it no matter what!

Makes me wonder about that last 1% of Cartographer in Tyria. Wondering around every inch of every mission, and every area again and again.

i dont know how they code all of it or even if it works the same way but they could just put a minus 1 for say quest available starting from the pool of all available quests for that campaign then every time they complete a quest put a plus 1 in that until quests completed = # of available quests, so ya fairly easy to do if its as basic as ai think it is even though it probably is far from easy since you have to go back into every single quest and i think theres 1000's since my war has easilly 300 unfinished quests.

Edit: uh nameless you can make a thing that says once the quest is done once you wont get credit for it again. so it wouldent be that hard. also festival quests wouldent be added since that dosent make any sense.

1. Like ALL missions, ALL dungeons and like most Eye of the North primary quests. In both cases, they count the first time you make them.
2. There are not 'too many'. See the wiki, they are around 500. Just see the flags when the character is loaded or when the character receives a reward. In a similar way cartographer did.
3. No. Quests like campaign-exclusive, profession-exclusive, campaign-travel and event-only quests won't count. It won't be a grind title for 'making quests' regardless of the quests. It would be a title for 'having certain primary and secondary quests done'. Additionally if there is a quest arc that separates in two choices with different amount of quests (4 quests in one side and 3 in the other), the 'extra' quests won't count. EotN quests either won't count or be counted into the Master of the North title, if they are not counted already.
4. Same when for cartographer. Arenas banished and the Grenth's footprint was added. Yet people still kept the 100%. This is done easily, if you get the title made, you won't lose it if a new quest is added, if you don't, you'll have to make the new quests to get it. This way those that make quests sooner are treated a bit. On top of that, there has been no more quests since Eye of the North, some those are counted in Master of the North. And for the other campaigns there has been no new additions since the 'travel to EotN' quests, and those won't count for being 'campaign travel' quests.

And quests are not like exploring. They are easier. All quests are in the wiki, instead of walking all over the world, you just go to the 'Adventurer Rank' page, see the list of quests that count for the title, see their pre-requisites, and go talk to the NPCs that give them. Much easier than looking all over the world for a single point to uncover.

The only problem here is 'time and resources' to make it, and that's Anet problem.

It's pretty easy to make a/this title track, you are obviously unaware about what you are saying, as seen in your other post in this thread. It's not at all a good argument.

None of the titles are needed except for the champion title track... I mean wtfcare?

/signed btw ^^

it should not be a lot of trouble for Anet but fix the economy (Farmers ftl) a bit. Also it's fun. I think it should be split up in whatever you call it of Tyria/Cantha/Elona and add the rest to the EOTN title. And one for all max ofc.

This title won't force you to finish quests.
This is a reward for those that finish them.