well after having to renew the agreement with the canthan new year update I gave the TOS another thorough read.
Now, I know it is against the tos to sell accounts etc.
I was just wondering out of blind curiosity if it applies if you were just giving your account way for whatever reason, fully transferring all documentation etc over to person (a).
I don't plan on giving guild wars up, just wondering if I were to think about it at some point in time, if I'd be violation of the user agreement.
I'm really not great when it comes to making sense of a lot of the babble in those because, they obviously make them very vague.
just a quick question regarding the TOS
1 pages • Page 1
T
I'm almost 100% certain that it is against the TOS to transfer an account, period. The reason is, if I wanted to sell you my account, and transferring the account for free was permitted, I could sell you a "strategy guide" for the game that just so happened to have the login and account information. Basically, the prohibition on transferring accounts is there to cover any method someone might try and use to get around a direct sale of an account...
A
Seller: "Giving away *FREE* account"
Buyer #1: "Sure, I'll take it"
Buyer #2: "Oh, you're such a nice person, here, take these 150k - as a gift"
What? No account trade happened here.
First reason why account trades are forbidden by EULA is to protect people from themselves. It's too easy to scam with these trades. This was discovered way back in UO times. Those eventually provided escrow service to allow people to legitimately transfer accounts for real money.
In GW, this doesn't make sense, since it's sold copies that make money.
With that in mind, and lack of realistic control over such trades, Anet can't do anything but look the other way and say: "You're not allowed to do it". There simply is no other option. Any attempt to allow limited ownership transfer opens so many problems, that they'd be flooded with various i've been scammed claims, holding Anet responsible.
Buyer #1: "Sure, I'll take it"
Buyer #2: "Oh, you're such a nice person, here, take these 150k - as a gift"
What? No account trade happened here.
First reason why account trades are forbidden by EULA is to protect people from themselves. It's too easy to scam with these trades. This was discovered way back in UO times. Those eventually provided escrow service to allow people to legitimately transfer accounts for real money.
In GW, this doesn't make sense, since it's sold copies that make money.
With that in mind, and lack of realistic control over such trades, Anet can't do anything but look the other way and say: "You're not allowed to do it". There simply is no other option. Any attempt to allow limited ownership transfer opens so many problems, that they'd be flooded with various i've been scammed claims, holding Anet responsible.
In reality, it is impossible to transfer ownership of an account. You cannot change the Account Name, only the password. If a dispute arises over ownership, the person with the most proofs will retain the account. If it seems to ANet that someone was trying to sell/trade the account, the account is blocked permanently.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Darcy
In reality, it is impossible to transfer ownership of an account. You cannot change the Account Name, only the password. If a dispute arises over ownership, the person with the most proofs will retain the account. If it seems to ANet that someone was trying to sell/trade the account, the account is blocked permanently.
|
You can change acc name.. Change email.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Darcy
In reality, it is impossible to transfer ownership of an account. You cannot change the Account Name, only the password. If a dispute arises over ownership, the person with the most proofs will retain the account. If it seems to ANet that someone was trying to sell/trade the account, the account is blocked permanently.
|
Transfer of accounts is against the Terms of Service, yes. I can't speak to why this is, but my guess is that when you transfer your account to someone else, ANet does not know this, and doesn't force the new account holder to agree to the new ToS, so it's to prevent players from saying "I didn't agree to that" and being right.
If you're just giving the account away, however, I doubt sincerely that any action would be taken against them, but it is a technical violation, yes.
If you're just giving the account away, however, I doubt sincerely that any action would be taken against them, but it is a technical violation, yes.
