i really don't know where else to ask this question so sorry

http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage....roduct detail
kazi_saki
Malakili
Blackhearted
kazi_saki
Tamuril elansar
Elder III
Eddie Frenzy Spam
2Broke!
Snograt
snaek
Snograt
Raiin Maker
zamial
Originally Posted by snaek
|
Lord Sojar
Originally Posted by zamial
Thankyou sony for root kit I will never buy any of your products again.
|
zamial
Lord Sojar
Originally Posted by zamial
Now if we can only get sony to back down on the $ for their name stamped on stuff......
|
kazi_saki
Lord Sojar
Originally Posted by kazi_saki
wow....so many choices now
![]() the asus, hp, and especially that gateway notebook looks really nice! I guess it'll take me awhile to decide and I like those three brands + acer (but no one suggested an acer laptop). gw community rocks and thanx for the very nice feedback! ![]() |
zamial
Lord Sojar
Originally Posted by zamial
pretty? lol pretty? rajah pretty will never sell me. I would use an old Toughbook if the components were all solid state and it was bleeding edge. But that is just me. pretty normally = very breakable.
People need to learn that it is not what is on the outside, but what is on the inside is what matters. This applies to more than just computers. |
Blackhearted
Originally Posted by Rahja the Thief
You are most welcome.
But, looking back on all the suggestions, I really want to push this one.... http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16834220334 For those of you who are too lazy to go to my link... Here are the main reasons I chose that lappy. CPU Type Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 2.2G Screen 17" WUXGA Memory Size 2GB DDR2 Hard Disk 250GB Graphics Card NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT Video Memory 256MB GDDR3 VRAM Screen Size 17.0" Wide Screen Support Yes Display Type Wide UXGA Resolution 1920 x 1200 Note the bolded features, for that extra, ooooh, and ahhh. |
Lord Sojar
Originally Posted by Blackhearted
Um... I may not be an expert on the power of laptop GPU's but i think the 8600m GT is slightly weaker than the desktop counterpart. And i could guarantee that if the desktop version wouldn't comfortably handle games at that things native resolution without a lot of sacrifices, that the weaker notebook version wont either.
|
Blackhearted
Originally Posted by Rahja the Thief
Don't underestimate the 8600m. I helped engineered that little baby, and it can pull its own weight. It will be able to run many games at 1920x1200, and it can make Vista cry for mercy. It will have no issue running GW1 at full rez, with VSync and full graphics and 4xAA, steady 60FPS. GW2? Well, probably 30FPS. It can run Crysis at 1920x1200 at medium settings and some good custom tweaking on the options. It is a great little card with a much smaller TWP than its larger brother, the 8800 or 8700. This will help with battery life and mobility, which I don't think the OP wanted to lose entirely. This laptop isn't a desktop replacement. You have to realize that this is a notebook, and most notebooks cannot compete with their desktop equivalents, at least not with any hope of being unplugged from the wall.
I do believe this to be the best option for the OP because of the native resolution of that screen, and it packs enough power to handle most of the newer games at decent settings. Even if he has to move the resolution back a bit, the resolution is still very high, and it gives a lot of wiggle room. You can always lower pixel count, but you can never add to it (at least not without a microlaser, Tesla toolset, and ummm, I can't remember the rest of the junk used for LCD production.) |
Lord Sojar
Originally Posted by Blackhearted
Wow. Getting crysis to run decently on an 8600 series chip at a res like that(past what i'd really recommend 8600's for myself, personally) is kinda surprising. GW1 i'd figure wouldn't have much trouble though, since it's pretty old. Also, i know it's not a desktop replacement. I just compared it to the desktop variant of the since it's exactly the same except for slightly lower clocks on the rops, tmu's and shaders, iirc.
And yea, you could maybe drop the res a bit but with LCD's that usually comes with a bit of a hit on your screens image quality. I remember how bad windows and stuff looks on LCD's, even smaller ones, with the default xp drivers that only give you like.. 800x600 and 1024x768 and junk like that before you install the drivers lol. |
Dark Kal
Originally Posted by Rahja the Thief
For those of you who are too lazy to go to my link... Here are the main reasons I chose that lappy.
CPU Type Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 2.2G Screen 17" WUXGA Memory Size 2GB DDR2 Hard Disk 250GB Graphics Card NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT Video Memory 256MB GDDR3 VRAM Screen Size 17.0" Wide Screen Support Yes Display Type Wide UXGA Resolution 1920 x 1200 Note the bolded features, for that extra, ooooh, and ahhh. |
Malice Black