Since HoM is going to be account wide, this title should also be made account wide, since it also affects the Hall of Monuments but rewards single-character play.
It should count the total number of unique maxed titles present in all of your characters and use that number. It wouldn't be any harder to do since you'd still have to get all the titles. But you wouldn't have to do it all on one character.
Make KoaBD account-wide
Marverick
Lawrence Chang
Alot of other titles should be accountwide, including Treasure Hunter and Wisdom.
MirkoTeran
No need to cheapen the title that doesn't bring any benefits.
Konig Des Todes
I don't see a need to make KoaBD account wide, but I do see where you are coming from. It wouldn't be terrible if the title only counted each title one per account, so that people cannot make 8 characters and get all three protectors, then have 24 maxed titles. Doing that will encourage multiple character play as much as the account based HoM. But again, I don't see a real need to do so (but that's because I like playing minimal characters, so my opinion is biased).
Although I do think Sweet Tooth, Drunkard, Party Animal, Wisdom, and Treasure Hunter titles should be account wide, and if those five titles are account wide, that makes KoaBD easier in terms of having it on all characters.
Although I do think Sweet Tooth, Drunkard, Party Animal, Wisdom, and Treasure Hunter titles should be account wide, and if those five titles are account wide, that makes KoaBD easier in terms of having it on all characters.
isildorbiafra
This title is only for those who invested alot of time in the development of a single character! NOT SIGNED!!!!!!!!!!
Oukanna
Sweet tooth and drunkard etc, i think should be account wide, as they are soo expensive and drunkard is expensive and time consuming.
KoBD shouldnt really be account wide, as its a title for maxed titles on your character. Giving it account wide access, sort of cheapens it i think.
KoBD shouldnt really be account wide, as its a title for maxed titles on your character. Giving it account wide access, sort of cheapens it i think.
Tyla
The only titles that should be account-wide (Providing the other characters are level 20), are rep and big grinds.
N1ghtstalker
/notsigned imo
the only account wide titles should be wisdom and treasure
that's it
the only account wide titles should be wisdom and treasure
that's it
odly
Well I'll sign it.
/signed
It's a bit late for me now, but I would have preferred getting legendary vanquisher, skillhunter and guardian on different characters.
I dislike the way KOBD tittle makes us play just one character all the time.
I understand how it doesn't make sense "Lore-wise" but it makes sense "Fun-wise" for me.
/signed
It's a bit late for me now, but I would have preferred getting legendary vanquisher, skillhunter and guardian on different characters.
I dislike the way KOBD tittle makes us play just one character all the time.
I understand how it doesn't make sense "Lore-wise" but it makes sense "Fun-wise" for me.
Horus
this would make it easier for players who "missed" legendary survivor and maybe made their character before that title was actually in game? As well wisdom and treasure hunter titles are pointless to be done on more than 1 character, not to mention how pointless it would be to max sunspear/lightbringer/asuran/norn/dwarven/vanguard titles on more than one characters :/ Imo these are they ones to be account wide
/ 1/2signed
/ 1/2signed
Sjeng
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by N1ghtstalker
/notsigned imo
the only account wide titles should be wisdom and treasure that's it |
I wouldn't mind party animal / sweet tooth / drunkard being account wide, so you could use these items on all your characters and not just on one. Kinda sucks to always have to show up at parties with the same character, and that none of my other chars can benefit from drunkenness with dwarven PvE skills. But most of all I hate the fact that opening chests is spread out, and that my main has to ID every gold thing my other toons find.
Shadowhaze
More account wide titles would be nice. But then I like playing more than one char.
Abedeus
/signed grind/buyable titles like Drunkard, Sweet Tooth, EotN and NF titles account-wide.
/unsigned account-wide KoaBD.
/unsigned account-wide KoaBD.
Solas
/signed i dont see why not
it'd allow peopel without survivor to attain it.
it'd allow peopel without survivor to attain it.
Kattar
Quote:
|
/signed grind/buyable titles like Drunkard, Sweet Tooth, EotN and NF titles account-wide. /unsigned account-wide KoaBD. |
Ewon
Let's just make everything attainable for everyone. In fact while were at it, lets just give everyone the title, that'd be cool right?
If you want the KoaBD title, then work for it. At the moment it is at least a little bit of an accomplishment for PvE'er. No need to make it easier.
you don't need survivor (or LDoA)
/notsigned
If you want the KoaBD title, then work for it. At the moment it is at least a little bit of an accomplishment for PvE'er. No need to make it easier.
Quote:
|
/signed i dont see why not it'd allow peopel without survivor to attain it. |
/notsigned
Awex Mafyews
Same as everyone else really. KoaBD shouldn't be account wide as it wouldnt be earned by every character. Titles like Drunkard/Sweet tooth/Party animal/Wisdom/Treasure Hunter should be although i dissagree that grindable titles such as SS/LB and EotN rep points should be account wide as they would allow characters benefits that they had not really earned.
/signed buyable titles /not signed KoaBD and Grindable titles
/signed buyable titles /not signed KoaBD and Grindable titles
okey86
sorry totally disagree. i have made rank 6 KoaBD and i would hate to see it go account wide. those who do want it to go account wide are just lazy and dont want to put the effort in. it took me a long time to get rank 6 and having this title proves that. if u made it account wide and jsut created 8 chars and maxed the 3 protector titles thats just lame, the KoaBD title track would be worthless. I also disagree with making the gind titles account based. its not hard to put all ur golds in storage as u get them and then id them on ur main char, thats what i did. wisdom/drunkard etc are achievements that should not be watered down by allowing 8 chars to work on it. the only thing id like to see happen is the creation of an emote for the KoaBD title. similar to the fame and zrank titles. they are both pvp based emotes and its about time that there was a pve emote so those who are majority pve can show off thier acievements in the same manner that the pvp people do
Ate of DK
/not signed.
This is just fine as it it.
This is just fine as it it.
Enix
What about a compromise?
*All "grind" titles should be account wide (Wisdom, Treasure, EoTN Reps, SS/LB, Sweet Tooth, Drunkard, etc).
*All Campaign-specific titles should not (Vanquisher, Cartographer, Protector, Master of the North).
The way it is now is somewhat silly for players who have many secondary charecters.
Skill > Time?
/kindasigned
*All "grind" titles should be account wide (Wisdom, Treasure, EoTN Reps, SS/LB, Sweet Tooth, Drunkard, etc).
*All Campaign-specific titles should not (Vanquisher, Cartographer, Protector, Master of the North).
The way it is now is somewhat silly for players who have many secondary charecters.
Skill > Time?
/kindasigned
MithranArkanere
I won't be against making other tittles account wide.
But this one is particullary a description of the character.
If you don't make exploration, missions, quests and all skills account wide too, it should stay character-based.
But this one is particullary a description of the character.
If you don't make exploration, missions, quests and all skills account wide too, it should stay character-based.
Solas
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ZoakaEwon
Let's just make everything attainable for everyone. In fact while were at it, lets just give everyone the title, that'd be cool right?
|
Everyone should have an equal starting point on gaining a title.
DoA would prob be the exception, you know with time travel and that:P
Quote:
| If you want the KoaBD title, then work for it. At the moment it is at least a little bit of an accomplishment for PvE'er. No need to make it easier. |
only problem would be cartographher with the starting zones, but that would relaly only give elonian chars an advantage.
Quote:
| you don't need survivor (or LDoA) |
/
romeus petrus
/notsigned
People don't need more incentives for mindless grinding.
People don't need more incentives for mindless grinding.
Kanyatta
Only if all grind titles become account wide would I sign this.
Seeing as they are not, /notsign, because you could just do protector of tyria (easiest max title imo, besides bought titles) 5 times and get a quick KoaBD.
Seeing as they are not, /notsign, because you could just do protector of tyria (easiest max title imo, besides bought titles) 5 times and get a quick KoaBD.
aaje vhanli
Agree with all the /not signed
Luminarus
Some titles should be account wide, but ones that give individual character benefits (aka grind titles, eotn rep, ss/lb) shouldnt be. IMO Luxon/Kurz should be individual chars, but alot lower req.
Drunkard/Treasure/Party/Treasure/Wisdom should be account wide, because they cost more, take longer then any other of the titles.
KOABD shouldnt be party wide because of those reasons.
Drunkard/Treasure/Party/Treasure/Wisdom should be account wide, because they cost more, take longer then any other of the titles.
KOABD shouldnt be party wide because of those reasons.
ilipol
Since ANET decided to make the titles account wide, for GW2, everything else is pointless, to my opinion...
/not signed
/not signed
stale
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Enix
What about a compromise?
*All "grind" titles should be account wide (Wisdom, Treasure, EoTN Reps, SS/LB, Sweet Tooth, Drunkard, etc). *All Campaign-specific titles should not (Vanquisher, Cartographer, Protector, Master of the North). The way it is now is somewhat silly for players who have many secondary charecters. Skill > Time? /kindasigned |
Phantom Flux
/signed I have a life so yes. I dont want to grind and grind and grind 24/7!
mage767
GW EOTN is a great training ground for grinding for a player before he picks up a copy of WoW.
Yawgmoth
A Big Massive Online Multiplayer /SIGNED
This title is the number 1 barrier that puts players playing more than 1 char at a disadvantage.
This title should count *unique max'ed titles on the account*
What's the point of having to repeately GRIND all those titles just to have another different copy of KoaBD on different chars? Why not simply make it a title that will aggregate YOUR achievements you made while playing GW but not restricted to just one char.
God Walking Among Mere Mortals wouldn't become any easier to get! At all! You would still need to max the same number of titles!
It would be a great strict IMPROVEMENT.
HoM going account-based is great but it only matters with GW2 in mind. KoaBD matters here and now, and it's impossible to get without extreme strict dedication to just 1 character. And it's still an very important part of HoM aswell...
Seriously, there are NO reasonable arguments against changing this title. Zero.
This title is the number 1 barrier that puts players playing more than 1 char at a disadvantage.
This title should count *unique max'ed titles on the account*
What's the point of having to repeately GRIND all those titles just to have another different copy of KoaBD on different chars? Why not simply make it a title that will aggregate YOUR achievements you made while playing GW but not restricted to just one char.
God Walking Among Mere Mortals wouldn't become any easier to get! At all! You would still need to max the same number of titles!
It would be a great strict IMPROVEMENT.
HoM going account-based is great but it only matters with GW2 in mind. KoaBD matters here and now, and it's impossible to get without extreme strict dedication to just 1 character. And it's still an very important part of HoM aswell...
Seriously, there are NO reasonable arguments against changing this title. Zero.
Elusive of SoLD
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Yawgmoth
Seriously, there are NO reasonable arguments against changing this title. Zero.
|
/notsigned.
jimme
hurray for pre searing characters with 'God walking amongst mere mortals'
/notsigned
/notsigned
cellardweller
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MirkoTeran
No need to cheapen the title that doesn't bring any benefits.
|
isamu kurosawa
Just by making rep titles and wisdom/treasure hunter account based then koabd will automatically become mostly account based anyway. So no need.
obsidian ectoplasm
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Phantom Flux
. I dont want to grind and grind and grind 24/7!
|
This game does not force you to get xx amount of title to do xx
Titles are bonus's
Yawgmoth
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Elusive of SoLD
Only that it's not fair to those who have already endured the grind to get this title on one character. There achievement will be diminished (sp?) somewhat if everyone and their pet is running around with the same title.
|
Think before posting bs...
Josh
KoaBD - Account-Wide?
/notsigned
Grind Title - Account Wide?
/signed
/notsigned
Grind Title - Account Wide?
/signed
Raccoon
Please stop making all these "make this title account wide" polls and threads.
NO, NO AND NO!
Seriously, if you are not willing to try and get KoaBD on another character because you already got it on your first one, then you don't deserve it for that new character.
How is it hard for you people to comprehend this? If you arn't willing to work for it, you dont deserve the title.
NO, NO AND NO!
Seriously, if you are not willing to try and get KoaBD on another character because you already got it on your first one, then you don't deserve it for that new character.
How is it hard for you people to comprehend this? If you arn't willing to work for it, you dont deserve the title.
Chico
Not signed for KoaBD but yes for making "big grinds" account wide. By big grinds I mean non campaign specific titles so it brings the titles down to only two: Treasure hunter and Wisdom.