Should Wisdom / Treasure hunter be account based?

deluxe

deluxe

Desert Nomad

Join Date: Feb 2006

Monkeyball Z

S.K.A.T. [Ban]

Mo/

Let's hope a-net reads this, because it's pretty obvious what the people want!

distilledwill

distilledwill

Forge Runner

Join Date: Sep 2006

Blighty

The Legion of the Blue Blade

R/Mo

This is one account wide merging that I do advocate. It is a pain sticking any worthless gold in my storage so that I can log onto my previous main (which, to be honest, I don't play all that much anymore) and ID it.

So, lets go!

MithranArkanere

MithranArkanere

Underworld Spelunker

Join Date: Nov 2006

wikipedia.org/wiki/Vigo

Heraldos de la Llama Oscura [HLO]

E/

They are just like the Lucky title, they give benefits and they take quite some time to max.
So, like the Lucky title, they should be account-wide.

Wisdom can be increased by any character regardless of who got the Gold item.
And points for Treasure Hunter can be obtained even in Presearing thanks to the Easter Eggs.

I Phoenix I

I Phoenix I

Jungle Guide

Join Date: Jan 2007

The Elite Lords of Chaos [LoC]

R/

/signed

Would be great to not have to give them all to one character to ID.

Day Trooper

Day Trooper

Frost Gate Guardian

Join Date: Mar 2006

Guild With No [NAM???]

E/Mo

I've heard a rumor that ANet is strongly considering making SS/LB account-based...

However, from looking at that thread and the poll; peeps are only ** slightly ** in favor of ANet making this change.

But here, it's obvious that the overwhelming majority of folks want Treasure Hunter/Wisdom to be account-based.

So Anet - please 'give the people what they want' here! Make these two incredible grindfest titles account-based!!

komma

komma

Wilds Pathfinder

Join Date: Aug 2007

None

N/

sheesh might aswell make all titles account based so every noob can have em.../not signed...if your a title hunter pick a main and deal w it.

Kanyatta

Forge Runner

Join Date: Jun 2006

Guildless, pm me

R/Mo

Quote:
Originally Posted by komma
sheesh might aswell make all titles account based so every noob can have em
Yeah, because "WTB Gold Unid's 750g/ea" makes you pr0, amirite? or "LFG HM Chest Run/WTB Lockpicks"

Edit: Please eliminate unnecessary "I herd u liek eggz?" option, or whatever. It was never funny and just skews poll results.

Shadowmoon

Shadowmoon

Wilds Pathfinder

Join Date: Jun 2006

N/A

N/

Wisdom, yes, people already move all their golds to another character to id them via storage.
teasure hunter, no, it hurt those trying to get max unlucky. unlucky is easiest max using a r0 teasure hunter character, making teasure hunter account base would make unlucky harder to max.

Incandecree

Frost Gate Guardian

Join Date: Oct 2006

Archons of Elona

Mo/

I have one char that is R7 Treasure and my account is R6 Lucky. I am all for making Lucky and Unlucky account based. I don't feel as if I would be cheated if this went account based. Does me working hard to get 10k chests on one char take the same amount of effort as someone else getting 10k chests over 10 chars? Possibly. I just chose to dedicate more time to one character.

As for the Unlucky title. It maxes at 500k points and it would take 20000 lockpicks breaking to max that title. That makes it much harder to max than the lucky title just because of the cost involved. My account is almost to R6 Unlucky and I for sure do not want to break more lockpicks to max that one.

Cebe

Cebe

The 5th Celestial Boss

Join Date: Jul 2006

Inverness, Scotland

The Cult of Scaro [WHO]

E/

We already have many, MANY threads relating to making titles account based. There was no need to create a new one simply for the purpose of posting a poll.

Please always search before posting ideas.

http://www.guildwarsguru.com/forum/s...=Account+based

/Locked.