It is obviously unfair that in challenge missions consets give an advantage to the richer people. Don't flame, I can easily afford them.
If you are going for a new record, you will be obligated to use them, or hack the game or cheat in some way.
I wouldn't like to see consets removed from the challenges, so I thought about something else:
Blessing
<Insert fancy name here>
Same effects as the consets.
This would be much more fair and cheap.
What do you think?
Challenge Missions and Consumables
newbie_of_doom
Shayne Hawke
So, you want everyone to have the feeling like they're using a conset all the time, except it's free?
LukeD
WTH is your problem ur moaning for moanings sake ffs
just use them challenge missions suck anyway jeez!
this community needs to get a grip serious!
just use them challenge missions suck anyway jeez!
this community needs to get a grip serious!
Snow Bunny
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by newbie_of_doom
It is obviously unfair that in challenge missions consets give an advantage to the richer people. Don't flame, I can easily afford them.
If you are going for a new record, you will be obligated to use them, or hack the game or cheat in some way. I wouldn't like to see consets removed from the challenges, so I thought about something else: Blessing <Insert fancy name here> Same effects as the consets. This would be much more fair and cheap. What do you think? |
cellardweller
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by newbie_of_doom
I wouldn't like to see consets removed from the challenges, so I thought about something else:
|
MagmaRed
Ursan+Essence+Grail+Armor=win
Challenge missions are PvE. Unless you face other real players, those items should stay. Not sure PvE should have them, least not how they currently are, but why make some parts of PvE different? I know it is not the same, but it sounds exactly like the people who say it is unfair people use Ursan+cons to farm UW and FoW.
Challenge missions are PvE. Unless you face other real players, those items should stay. Not sure PvE should have them, least not how they currently are, but why make some parts of PvE different? I know it is not the same, but it sounds exactly like the people who say it is unfair people use Ursan+cons to farm UW and FoW.
MithranArkanere
So... basically... you say 'do not let them use those items, of give them to me for free'?
Why?
Why?
nidy
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MithranArkanere
So... basically... you say 'do not let them use those items, of give them to me for free'?
Why? |
MithranArkanere
They don't require anyone to be 'rich'.
For each time you make Kilroy's dungeon you can get one powerstone or two of the others.
For each time you make Kilroy's dungeon you can get one powerstone or two of the others.
nidy
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MithranArkanere
They don't require anyone to be 'rich'.
For each time you make Kilroy's dungeon you can get one powerstone or two of the others. |
T. Drake
I've played a few Challenge Missions with my guild a few days ago. And I thought about the fact how unfair it is if A.Net allows ConSets and PvE Skills for what they call "competitive missions".
But then, the reward fo playing these missions sucks so much that I give a damn about it or the highscore list.
/not signed for the blessing
/signed for prohibiting any ConSets or PvE Skills to maintain the competitive nature of these challenges (as strange as that may sound)
But then, the reward fo playing these missions sucks so much that I give a damn about it or the highscore list.
/not signed for the blessing
/signed for prohibiting any ConSets or PvE Skills to maintain the competitive nature of these challenges (as strange as that may sound)