25 Jul 2008 at 15:43 - 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by Widowmaker
A little ironic, is it not, that my point was only made to highlight and elaborate on your point, for the sake of a new artist, yet you felt it was a criticism of your point and went on to defend yourself?
Isn't it even more ironic that I started by agreeing with you, and similarly went on to elaborate your point, and yet you assumed I was "defending myself"?
As for which criticisms to follow, I'd have to consider every one of them to see whether or not I agree, and I'd offer reasons as to why or why not. I'm developing my own style, as artists do, and if I had to make a general rule on which comments to follow, it would be ones that fit within this vision. Anatomy, likeness, colours, values, composition and so forth, are very important for me, whereas pixel-perfect photorealism is not. I aim for a loose style in speedpaints, so criticism on one misplaced pixel is not exactly useful, while criticism on the other qualities I mentioned would be beneficial.
I aim to be at least as skilled than the artists I study, and so far, I'm not even close. However, welcoming criticism from different points of view, whether I agree with them or not, will get me there faster than if I shut my ears to anyone with a comment on my work. After all, constructive criticism is not meant to be offensive, so what's the harm in hearing what people have to say?