THREAD PHAILZ EPIC LULZ!!ONE
More on topic, a quest title has been proposed
about 1000000 times
yes it is something thats needed "LFM GARLATH HM"
But seriously its not like you have to max every title, theres like 43 gainable titles
You need 30
GG
by implementing more titles, anet will need to move GWAM to 35 maxed
and that wont happen coz of the UBER QQ that will take place
so i highly doubt any more titles will be added, yet alone titles that suck.
Just settle with what you have if you dislike grinding, i got KOABD and thats all my E peen needs sorted.
guild wars 2 is like 1 or maybe 2 years away.. Hell maybe 3
so everybody STFU about it plz
Its ruined GW enough without more people being drawn in to the grind. Play guild wars
When guild wars 2 comes out play that.
this isn't GW2 guru so quit going on about things that will happen in GW2 if you do X
/rant
I propose 4 more titles.
Ultima pyromancer
Shayne Hawke
More titles isn't bad, but this idea is.
/notsigned.
/notsigned.
joshuarodger
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Sir Thunderbird
I was talking about the normal quests the npc's give you in and outside the outposts, you are talking about the main quests. See, you can't really call me stupid if you can't understand your own language.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Sir Thunderbird
I propose 4 titles for mission achieving: Tyrian/Canthan/Elonian and Legendary (Helper/Savior/Accomplisher?) You choose the name.
|
/notsigned
/close please
GaaaaaH
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Sir Thunderbird
Well, now I have 26 titles, and it sickens me that I won't be able to achieve the God amongst mere mortals one, because Pvp titles like Kurzick savior or gladiator have excessive requirements and I don't have the time, and the others require millions in gold, and are ridiculous for me (Drunkard, Sweet tooth). Therefore I want at least 4 more titles that require SKILL and not months of mindless farming.
I propose 4 titles for mission achieving: Tyrian/Canthan/Elonian and Legendary (Helper/Savior/Accomplisher?) You choose the name. Another one could go for money earnings, I mean by in-game drops and not for trades (Richie Rich?) Maybe you think that's too easy and everybody would have the God title, but I'd like to enjoy the game playing with others, trying new builds, doing something different everyday, instead of wasting my life away doing repetitive tasks. That being said, I hope Anet reads this post and you hold up my proposal. Thanks for reading. |
HAI! I don't like things the way they are becaus it's too hard for me to get what i want. Pls make it easier to do this ACHIEVEMENT so that i can do it and reduce the value of everyone who got it under the curent system.
QQ QQ QQ QQ etc.
Kthxbai
Konig Des Todes
The ONLY that should (and imo needs to) be added is the Adventurer title. Done for completing quests. That is not grinding, as your doing different quests each time. Not to mention it would have no bad points in having. As there are so many quests (around 100 per campaign I think, probably more) it would be just as hard (or annoying, depends on the person) to get the Legendary version of the title as it is for Legendary Vanquisher and whatnot.
/signed for Adventurer Title. /notsigned for OP (which doesn't really suggest anything, it is just a "I WAN MAOR TITLS!1!1" post).
Oh, right, /signed for close to keep flames to a minimum.
/signed for Adventurer Title. /notsigned for OP (which doesn't really suggest anything, it is just a "I WAN MAOR TITLS!1!1" post).
Oh, right, /signed for close to keep flames to a minimum.
Zapper901
The only problem with a quest title is that if A-Net puts one in they will surely make it 3 titles, one per campaign, and a legendary, so 4 more titles to make GWAMM even easier to get. I do not have GWAMM, and am not really going for it (the most titles I have is 8 on my Monk), but I think that there should be a title for them anyway, but preferably just one title that covers all campaigns.
Anyway, /notsigned for 4 quest titles, /kindasigned for 1.
Anyway, /notsigned for 4 quest titles, /kindasigned for 1.
Lykan
lmao 4 new titles just for you? sure!!
/notsigned
/notsigned
Marty Silverblade
It's hard. That's the point.
/notsigned.
EDIT: This is why I'm only aiming at R5. The last few for R6 is pointless time and money wasting.
/notsigned.
EDIT: This is why I'm only aiming at R5. The last few for R6 is pointless time and money wasting.
Winterclaw
I can't even talk myself in to R2 for the birdy.
Yichi
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Motoko Kusanagi War
There are 36 maxable titles in this game.
You are asking for 40. Please refrain from suggesting in the future. |
Wound
I would like a birthday title, I think that would be great 
!
One Year And Going! (1)
!One Year And Going! (1)
shoyon456
The idea is right, put the OP failed to put it in perspective...
First off, everyone knows theres already mission titles (protector, guardian)
Secondly, GWAMM shouldn't be easy to get, and most titles don't require skill anyways, just an amazing amount of grind.
The OP is failing to explain how the lux/kurzick titles are just too much. Lets break it down in terms of faction per day. If you start out at 0, and out of the blue start doing HFFF everyday, nonstop like a bot making around 100k a day (VERY generous), it would still take 100 days to max the title. That is assuming you basically do nothing all day, log on gw, and do HFFF till you go to sleep only to wake up to do it again the next morning... for MORE THAN 2 MONTHS.
For a relatively normal person, about 50k a day, it would take 2x the time: 200 days.
The right way to solve this is implement a quest title track for each campaign, (has already been asked for) which would follow the legendary line:
Quest Seeker of ~~~~~
Legendary Quest Seeker
I personally, find that it will be difficult for me to reach GWAMM unless I do wisdom, because my main is not a survivor, and is nf born (not ldoa). The other titles, party animal/sweet tooth/drunkard are OK with me.
First off, everyone knows theres already mission titles (protector, guardian)
Secondly, GWAMM shouldn't be easy to get, and most titles don't require skill anyways, just an amazing amount of grind.
The OP is failing to explain how the lux/kurzick titles are just too much. Lets break it down in terms of faction per day. If you start out at 0, and out of the blue start doing HFFF everyday, nonstop like a bot making around 100k a day (VERY generous), it would still take 100 days to max the title. That is assuming you basically do nothing all day, log on gw, and do HFFF till you go to sleep only to wake up to do it again the next morning... for MORE THAN 2 MONTHS.
For a relatively normal person, about 50k a day, it would take 2x the time: 200 days.
The right way to solve this is implement a quest title track for each campaign, (has already been asked for) which would follow the legendary line:
Quest Seeker of ~~~~~
Legendary Quest Seeker
I personally, find that it will be difficult for me to reach GWAMM unless I do wisdom, because my main is not a survivor, and is nf born (not ldoa). The other titles, party animal/sweet tooth/drunkard are OK with me.
Ultima pyromancer
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by shoyon456
If you start out at 0, and out of the blue start doing HFFF everyday, nonstop like a bot making around 100k a day (VERY generous), it would still take 100 days to max the title. That is assuming you basically do nothing all day, log on gw, and do HFFF till you go to sleep only to wake up to do it again the next morning... for MORE THAN 2 MONTHS. |
But yea it does take a stupid amount of time to get and it needs to be sorted out. As for now, the two alliance tracks can be avoided so theres no reason not to get GWAM
and even if you do get it
Anet never said "Get god walking among mere mortals and we will give you a reward"
The only obvious reward so far is the big bird thing that looks ridiculous btw and thats at rank 2 of the title track.
Anet built this game on the philosophy of anti grind, I HIGHLY doubt they will reward all this grinding in GW2, if they do reward anything at all.... Assuming anet doesnt go for a wow clone or grind of conan style
pamelf
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Sir Thunderbird
Well, I gotta tell you, I'm working far from home these days, and my copy is in Spanish, but as a brief translation, I'll give you this...
"Forge your legend in the Hall of Monuments, and your descendants in the upcoming release of GW2 will get the rewards". When I get home in about a week I will even upload a screenshot. Where are the Anet comments about this? |
fireflyry
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Sir Thunderbird
Well, now I have 26 titles,
-snip- Therefore I want at least 4 more titles that require SKILL and not months of mindless farming. |
shoyon456
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ultima pyromancer
Not quite, i made it from rank 2 - rank 3 today and thats like 150k and you get double faction towards your title assuming you contribute to the guild
But yea it does take a stupid amount of time to get and it needs to be sorted out. As for now, the two alliance tracks can be avoided so theres no reason not to get GWAM |
And by "avoiding the alliance ranks" do you mean going for wisdom/treasure hunter instead? Wisdom seems like the path I will be taking, but its still a pretty long ride.
DarklingKiller
N + O = NO!
Other people got to Gods without 4 extra titles. So can you.
Other people got to Gods without 4 extra titles. So can you.
tmakinen
1. Every piece of evidence suggests that r5 KoaBD and full HoM are enough to reap maximal rewards in GW, GWAMM is only for those willing to go the extra mile just because it's there, and hence you'll have to do some of the mind-numbing grind titles. At r5 you've already shown enough skill, now it's time to show some dedication and tenacity.
2. "I can't bother to do what it takes so change the rules so that I'll get the reward anyway" is possibly the worst argument you can make. If you want it badly enough, leg it like everybody else. If you can't bother, you're clearly not wanting it badly enough.
/notsigned all over the place
2. "I can't bother to do what it takes so change the rules so that I'll get the reward anyway" is possibly the worst argument you can make. If you want it badly enough, leg it like everybody else. If you can't bother, you're clearly not wanting it badly enough.
/notsigned all over the place
upier
I support the idea of adding new titles and keeping the max VIP title at the amount it is now.
It's not about making it easier - it's about making it different.
Would I like obtaining 30 max titles to go for the title?
Sure, why not! GW2 benefits are connected to titles!
Would I like maxing 30 titles out of the ones that are currently in the game?
Hell no! They just aren't fun.
It's not about making it easier - it's about making it different.
Would I like obtaining 30 max titles to go for the title?
Sure, why not! GW2 benefits are connected to titles!
Would I like maxing 30 titles out of the ones that are currently in the game?
Hell no! They just aren't fun.
MirkoTeran
Do you want a lollipop to go with the "QQ, I want all NOW"?
Arduin
Or give us 4 free titles and bump the max Rank of KoaBD up to 35! Yay!
jackerduud
300 hours of HFFFing = Very Tempting 
I'd love a Questing title though.
Legendary Mother Theresa (1) plz.
Legendary H3lpful D00D 0f 3l0n4 (6)
I'd love a Questing title though.
Legendary Mother Theresa (1) plz.
Legendary H3lpful D00D 0f 3l0n4 (6)
RotteN
stop whining, start HFFF
MagmaRed
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Sir Thunderbird
I was talking about the normal quests the npc's give you in and outside the outposts, you are talking about the main quests. See, you can't really call me stupid if you can't understand your own language.
|
You either need to reword your original post, or make a new one. Currently, you suggestion makes you look stupid, as does your responses to people. I am trying to help you, and I don't know why, as you clearing don't understand how to present an idea in a way people will understand.
Sir Thunderbird
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MagmaRed
Read YOUR post again. You said MISSION achievement, not QUEST. There is a difference between the 2, and you have not distinguished. If you want a quest related title(s), then explain how those would work. Currently there are other people who have suggested a title for questing, none have been implemented even though they have been suggested many times for a long time.
You either need to reword your original post, or make a new one. Currently, you suggestion makes you look stupid, as does your responses to people. I am trying to help you, and I don't know why, as you clearing don't understand how to present an idea in a way people will understand. |
Jetdoc
Wow, making fun of someone else's grammar when you admit that you have the same grammar problems...
Seriously, there is a reason that GWAMM is a relatively difficult title to get. Not only does it require a ton of money, it also requires a ton of time and/or skill. It sounds like you've accomplished all the titles that don't require a large amount of those, and now you're upset because you've hit the true "hard" part of getting the title.
I personally would love a questing title, but if they introduced new titles like this, I would hope that they would increase the requirement for GWAMM accordingly (or create a new level on top of GWAMM).
So, I like the idea but hate your reason for it.
Seriously, there is a reason that GWAMM is a relatively difficult title to get. Not only does it require a ton of money, it also requires a ton of time and/or skill. It sounds like you've accomplished all the titles that don't require a large amount of those, and now you're upset because you've hit the true "hard" part of getting the title.
I personally would love a questing title, but if they introduced new titles like this, I would hope that they would increase the requirement for GWAMM accordingly (or create a new level on top of GWAMM).
So, I like the idea but hate your reason for it.
cataphract
This idea is worse than anet's "wintersday in july" brainfart.
romeus petrus
/notsigned
It is amazing how many people are asking for more titles these days.
It is amazing how many people are asking for more titles these days.
Arduin
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Sir Thunderbird
...the joke's on you for not being able to get the idea without having someone else draw a sketch for you.
|
However, now it's clear you are suggestion a Quest Title, you can join in on all the other threads already suggesting this very title.
Edit: I even found you one thread:
Quote:
| Index of Ideas - Check this thread and use SEARCH before posting ANY new thread |
MagmaRed
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Sir Thunderbird
"As you CLEARING don't understand..." Homeschooling too much, trailer-park girl? English is not my native language so it's normal for me to make such mistakes, the joke's on you for not being able to get the idea without having someone else draw a sketch for you.
|
/unsigned
I'd rather read a suggestion by Solange
komma
OP why dont you go for different titles, instead of proposing very bad ideas to help yourself out. how bout the title for just loading into a city, "you are now playing the game" title....or hmmm lets see switch chars 5 times in 5 mins title to, what else.....oh yea the using storage title, that one takes mad skill....d'uh how can i forget the logging out title....if you cant get these last 4 you fail.
Tearz1993
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Sir Thunderbird
"As you CLEARING don't understand..." Homeschooling too much, trailer-park girl? English is not my native language so it's normal for me to make such mistakes, the joke's on you for not being able to get the idea without having someone else draw a sketch for you.
|
stupid
Tyla
I think one word sums up the OP.
"GIMME!"
"GIMME!"
Martin Firestorm
Noooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Kanyatta
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Namiren
Maybe titles for COMPLETING campaings (prop, fc, nf)
Like: Slayer of The Lich Slayer of Shiro Slayer of Abaddon |
Stoeffer
/notsigned
/close
Everything has been said. If you don't want to work for the titles provided, don't go for GWAMM. Plain and simple
/close
Everything has been said. If you don't want to work for the titles provided, don't go for GWAMM. Plain and simple
Sir Thunderbird
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MagmaRed
Well, at least I now know not to try and help someone who wants to be an idiot. Did I comment on your English? No, I commented on your post. Since you felt a need to point out minor typos, I obviously can't help you. Since you want an idea that has been suggested MANY times, but can't even present that idea clearly, I'll leave this as my last post.
/unsigned I'd rather read a suggestion by Solange |
jiggles
can
we
please
learn
to
structure
paragraphs
in all seriousness though, why are people still whining about this? Just let it die.
we
please
learn
to
structure
paragraphs
in all seriousness though, why are people still whining about this? Just let it die.
cosyfiep
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Brimstonez
/not signed
Already too many bloody titles. The grind of this game is slowly starting to turn people away from it... |
Hailey Anne
/notsigned.
I proprose no more titles and no more new title threads.
I proprose no more titles and no more new title threads.