Decline in Quality of Guru Posts and Attitudes
Ariena Najea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Savio
So we have people who think we need to moderate more, and people who think we need to moderate less. I'm pretty sure that means we're where we should be.
I feel the current level of moderation is just about right on the forums, my intended point is that there is too much volume for the moderators to deal with at the current moderating standard. Things like the porn thread that was still here after several hours hurt Guru's reputation, and would be dealt with more swiftly with additional moderators on staff.
Kattar
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ariena Najea
I feel the current level of moderation is just about right on the forums, my intended point is that there is too much volume for the moderators to deal with at the current moderating standard. Things like the porn thread that was still here after several hours hurt Guru's reputation, and would be dealt with more swiftly with additional moderators on staff.
Heh, I do know what you mean about that. But we all have to sleep/work sometime.
Some things are going to slip through the cracks regardless of how many moderators there are.
We do have many more moderators than I've seen on other forums. Granted, we do have a higher volume of posts and users. As I mentioned earlier, there's always a ratio. The greater number of posts we have, there's a greater likelihood that something is going to be missed, whether it's a bad post in Riverside or a porn thread in Off Topic.
Some of our mods aren't as active as others, so some sections don't get as much attention as others. We all try to work together as much as possible to get things taken care of though. But regardless of how many moderators there are, somethings are going to get through, unfortunately.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d957/7d957795254ebd71862f2f4cfa66950cf6e78a54" alt="Stick Out Tongue"
We do have many more moderators than I've seen on other forums. Granted, we do have a higher volume of posts and users. As I mentioned earlier, there's always a ratio. The greater number of posts we have, there's a greater likelihood that something is going to be missed, whether it's a bad post in Riverside or a porn thread in Off Topic.
Some of our mods aren't as active as others, so some sections don't get as much attention as others. We all try to work together as much as possible to get things taken care of though. But regardless of how many moderators there are, somethings are going to get through, unfortunately.
Age
I have been here for over 3 years now and the what OP is saying is true the quality has gone down.You see posts with kitty pictures in them or any pics for that matter and there are more spammers just wanting to increase thier post count.It was a lot differnet pior 05 and 06 as the quality was really good from it went down.
The Guru is no more differse than GWIncgamers aka GWO it is just has big as the same site content and has just as many forums.The titles Moderators use is not necesarry more on the positive would be and debating with forum members is something that Moderators shouldn't be doing.I know Moderators have dislike and like for certian forum members which you shouldn't.
I do agree the quality of The Guru in last 2 years has gone down since 06.I am not sure why.I really enjoyed The Guru back in those days.I would like to point out there is more rubbing/baiting going on with emote /facepalm which to me is personal attack or an assault do that in real life and see where it gets you.It could mean the Admins don't how thier site looks or what get said on it as you can't take issues up with them.
The Guru is no more differse than GWIncgamers aka GWO it is just has big as the same site content and has just as many forums.The titles Moderators use is not necesarry more on the positive would be and debating with forum members is something that Moderators shouldn't be doing.I know Moderators have dislike and like for certian forum members which you shouldn't.
I do agree the quality of The Guru in last 2 years has gone down since 06.I am not sure why.I really enjoyed The Guru back in those days.I would like to point out there is more rubbing/baiting going on with emote /facepalm which to me is personal attack or an assault do that in real life and see where it gets you.It could mean the Admins don't how thier site looks or what get said on it as you can't take issues up with them.
Taurucis
I agree with the OP.
I joined a couple years ago when Guru was a fun place to be... A few months before I joined guru, I always hung around the "Post your funny ______!" threads because they were full of friendly comments, funny pictures/experiences, and it was just generally nice to read.
The aren't any threads I check on a regular basis anymore. It's either full of people arguing, or useless spam, or stuff that bashes other people.
As for the bit about "Should guru be moderated more, or moderated less?" personally I think it should be moderated more.
People have attempted to stalk, sexually harass, flame, and troll me, though I haven't really seen the moderators do anything about the perpetrators. (A few of those trolls are still bouncing around the IRC channel, happily trolling to their hearts' content.) Someone even claimed that he would send me a virus over IRC, though I managed to sort the issue out with the gamesurge support.
In the forums I liberally use the report button when I see a troll/rude post, about one in three times the mods do something. Another problem I noticed is that mods allow certain members to troll, hurl about insults, deviate from the original topic. I don't really have a problem with a particular mod, it's more like human nature I have trouble with... it is not the easiest thing to do, telling a friend that he/she has crossed the line.
"This is the internet, you're too serious, grow a thicker skin, QQ more, etc" I don't really care about that crap the trolls spout, this may be the internet but you are still interacting with real people. Caring about other's feelings is not "deep" or "carebearish" or "sissy" - it is being a human being, which is something quite a few guru goers have trouble with.
I joined a couple years ago when Guru was a fun place to be... A few months before I joined guru, I always hung around the "Post your funny ______!" threads because they were full of friendly comments, funny pictures/experiences, and it was just generally nice to read.
The aren't any threads I check on a regular basis anymore. It's either full of people arguing, or useless spam, or stuff that bashes other people.
As for the bit about "Should guru be moderated more, or moderated less?" personally I think it should be moderated more.
People have attempted to stalk, sexually harass, flame, and troll me, though I haven't really seen the moderators do anything about the perpetrators. (A few of those trolls are still bouncing around the IRC channel, happily trolling to their hearts' content.) Someone even claimed that he would send me a virus over IRC, though I managed to sort the issue out with the gamesurge support.
In the forums I liberally use the report button when I see a troll/rude post, about one in three times the mods do something. Another problem I noticed is that mods allow certain members to troll, hurl about insults, deviate from the original topic. I don't really have a problem with a particular mod, it's more like human nature I have trouble with... it is not the easiest thing to do, telling a friend that he/she has crossed the line.
"This is the internet, you're too serious, grow a thicker skin, QQ more, etc" I don't really care about that crap the trolls spout, this may be the internet but you are still interacting with real people. Caring about other's feelings is not "deep" or "carebearish" or "sissy" - it is being a human being, which is something quite a few guru goers have trouble with.
Ariena Najea
Quote:
The aren't any threads I check on a regular basis anymore. It's either full of people arguing, or useless spam, or stuff that bashes other people.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cad92/cad92c352bf211a2d62d5d42639ab3585ff7e244" alt="Smile"
It's almost a guarantee given Guru's current state that once a thread is more than a page, it's no longer worth going back to due to the lack of good conversation. A lot of the "help me out" threads are inherently like this and that's fine, but the debate/discussion threads (especially the lore ones) start out so interesting to read... and then mad-troll-disease sets in. I rarely check in with how discussions are going once they start to go downhill because there's never a point. Once someone posts a cat, the thread's lifespan becomes a ticking time bomb of insults/immaturity and is closed due to the spam. For another bad analogy, intelligent posting here is like being able to have fun without being drunk.
I used to see more bans for people wrecking threads in this manner, but I understand that the mods can't go through all the posts of every thread and give bans to every minor offender, however, every time I come back to this thread I realize even more so how Guru needs more mods to keep the forum under control.
Quote:
Heh, I do know what you mean about that. But we all have to sleep/work sometime. Some things are going to slip through the cracks regardless of how many moderators there are.
I understand moderators need to sleep, the solution isn't to give up, it's to add additional moderators who are on during the less-moderated times. The reason fire departments don't have an unlimited number of firetrucks and firefighters is because money is limited. Here on Guru, the number of capable, experienced, and trustworthy members far exceeds the optimal number of moderators, so supply is not an issue. There are no real costs of adding more moderators other than the time to inform the new moderators of how the behind-the-scenes systems work and perhaps pass on some advice. I feel our Guru administration is too caught up in trying to limit the number of moderators to realize that many of the problems mentioned in this thread would be resolved or mitigated by adding more capable mods.
Kattar
While I agree with your position overall, Ariena, finding moderators is not as easy as you may think. There are few people who demonstrate their commitment to helping others in this community, as well as playing an active role in the day to day goings on of the forum.
I'm sure whenever there's an announcement for more mods, more than a few people respond. But most of them only want it to have their name in black text, or a signature, or fancy title. Those are not the kind of people we need.
I personally have never heard any talk of trying to limit the number of mods. Finding responsible, trustworthy people who can represent both themselves and the community well is the only limiting factor. Finding people like that on the internet, I'm sure you'll agree, can be a daunting task at times.
And please don't take anything I'm saying as hostile. I don't mean to come across like that. It's obvious you care very much about this issue and I'm just trying to shed a little light on it.
I'm sure whenever there's an announcement for more mods, more than a few people respond. But most of them only want it to have their name in black text, or a signature, or fancy title. Those are not the kind of people we need.
I personally have never heard any talk of trying to limit the number of mods. Finding responsible, trustworthy people who can represent both themselves and the community well is the only limiting factor. Finding people like that on the internet, I'm sure you'll agree, can be a daunting task at times.
And please don't take anything I'm saying as hostile. I don't mean to come across like that. It's obvious you care very much about this issue and I'm just trying to shed a little light on it.
Diddy bow
Its bcause Guild wars is a very old game now, nothing is really left to be discovered so there are loads of people moaning about how much they hate it
.
I do miss alot of the old threads though, espically you laugh you lose
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cad92/cad92c352bf211a2d62d5d42639ab3585ff7e244" alt="Smile"
I do miss alot of the old threads though, espically you laugh you lose
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9c3af/9c3af3190a366e5289ce39c1a1ff006c1e8b1c41" alt="Frown"
Inde
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ariena Najea
I understand moderators need to sleep, the solution isn't to give up, it's to add additional moderators who are on during the less-moderated times. The reason fire departments don't have an unlimited number of firetrucks and firefighters is because money is limited. Here on Guru, the number of capable, experienced, and trustworthy members far exceeds the optimal number of moderators, so supply is not an issue. There are no real costs of adding more moderators other than the time to inform the new moderators of how the behind-the-scenes systems work and perhaps pass on some advice. I feel our Guru administration is too caught up in trying to limit the number of moderators to realize that many of the problems mentioned in this thread would be resolved or mitigated by adding more capable mods.
Heavens, I'm really going to go off here, write it up as a bitter admin, overworked, or just a bad mood but some of these posts are a bit too much opinion versus any actual facts. I know that perception is everything but some of these are far out in left field.
First off, excuse my shock at being told what I'm "too caught up in". I'm also so glad that you are the expert at knowing who exactly applies for these positions in the community.
Sarcasm aside, no it's not as easy as just bringing in more mods (let alone capable mods) who I can just turn loose and trust to moderate the forum and community as needed. There is actually a learning curve, I'm sure some of the new moderators on this site can tell you that. Not to mention that in this thread alone there have been some community members asking for less moderation. Which just goes to show that everyone has an opinion and a mindset on how they believe would be the best way to handle a situation, without actually being in the situation.
And to Age, your entire post is just phooey really, we are more then twice the size of GWO, moderators shouldn't be allowed to have an opinion? That's just ridiculous. I don't know or care how the site looks? I can guarantee you first hand I know exactly how Guru is protrayed/stereotyped/talked about or not talked about in the community. I visit daily more GW sites/guild sites/fan sites/gaming news sites then you can imagine. You can certainly take up any issue with me, as you have before... just because you don't like the answer doesn't mean I don't care.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2a9a/d2a9ab4de2883b90f703283079661bfa50dacdab" alt="Big Grin"
To Taurucis, we have indeed done something about it. Not sure why you are dredging up old news. I can understand that you were upset about it but we took action. Not to mention that no... I can't see your IRC PM's and what was said, so have no proof of anything that happens in an IRC PM to base any action off of. Your word against someone else's is never going to be a punishable offense unless I can witness it. Thought that was pretty self-explanatory and anyone else on this board should be thankful that I don't start banning based on no evidence.
As you can clearly see I'm watching and have been reading this thread. The majority are either of the opinion that it's the community in general that is bringing it down, the moderators, or that it's just a dying game and this is a natural cycle in that. I could state my own opinion on the matter but I think others in this thread have definitely touched on some of the key points.
First off, excuse my shock at being told what I'm "too caught up in". I'm also so glad that you are the expert at knowing who exactly applies for these positions in the community.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cad92/cad92c352bf211a2d62d5d42639ab3585ff7e244" alt="Smile"
Sarcasm aside, no it's not as easy as just bringing in more mods (let alone capable mods) who I can just turn loose and trust to moderate the forum and community as needed. There is actually a learning curve, I'm sure some of the new moderators on this site can tell you that. Not to mention that in this thread alone there have been some community members asking for less moderation. Which just goes to show that everyone has an opinion and a mindset on how they believe would be the best way to handle a situation, without actually being in the situation.
And to Age, your entire post is just phooey really, we are more then twice the size of GWO, moderators shouldn't be allowed to have an opinion? That's just ridiculous. I don't know or care how the site looks? I can guarantee you first hand I know exactly how Guru is protrayed/stereotyped/talked about or not talked about in the community. I visit daily more GW sites/guild sites/fan sites/gaming news sites then you can imagine. You can certainly take up any issue with me, as you have before... just because you don't like the answer doesn't mean I don't care.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2a9a/d2a9ab4de2883b90f703283079661bfa50dacdab" alt="Big Grin"
To Taurucis, we have indeed done something about it. Not sure why you are dredging up old news. I can understand that you were upset about it but we took action. Not to mention that no... I can't see your IRC PM's and what was said, so have no proof of anything that happens in an IRC PM to base any action off of. Your word against someone else's is never going to be a punishable offense unless I can witness it. Thought that was pretty self-explanatory and anyone else on this board should be thankful that I don't start banning based on no evidence.
As you can clearly see I'm watching and have been reading this thread. The majority are either of the opinion that it's the community in general that is bringing it down, the moderators, or that it's just a dying game and this is a natural cycle in that. I could state my own opinion on the matter but I think others in this thread have definitely touched on some of the key points.
Jae Onasi
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ariena Najea
Things like the porn thread that was still here after several hours hurt Guru's reputation, and would be dealt with more swiftly with additional moderators on staff.
In the case of porn, extreme trolling/outright flaming, or something along that line that I think needs immediate attention, I'll look to see which admins/s-mods are online and drop them a PM on top of reporting the post. I'm not sure how the report post system works on the back end of things here, so I don't know if mods get a pop-up, email notification, or what, or how long the system takes to kick a report to them. I figure a PM is pretty immediate.
By the way, thanks to all of you who take care of that. I have young kids, and we have one of our computers in the kitchen. I don't want to have a porn thread pop up when my kids happen to be looking over my shoulder or even just walking by. If that wasn't addressed so quickly, I, and I suspect a lot of other parents, would have to find an alternative to guru, which I would not want to do--there's usually always something interesting going on here, and I like this site.
By the way, thanks to all of you who take care of that. I have young kids, and we have one of our computers in the kitchen. I don't want to have a porn thread pop up when my kids happen to be looking over my shoulder or even just walking by. If that wasn't addressed so quickly, I, and I suspect a lot of other parents, would have to find an alternative to guru, which I would not want to do--there's usually always something interesting going on here, and I like this site.
Age
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inde
Heavens, I'm really going to go off here, write it up as a bitter admin, overworked, or just a bad mood but some of these posts are a bit too much opinion versus any actual facts. I know that perception is everything but some of these are far out in left field.
First off, excuse my shock at being told what I'm "too caught up in". I'm also so glad that you are the expert at knowing who exactly applies for these positions in the community.
Sarcasm aside, no it's not as easy as just bringing in more mods (let alone capable mods) who I can just turn loose and trust to moderate the forum and community as needed. There is actually a learning curve, I'm sure some of the new moderators on this site can tell you that. Not to mention that in this thread alone there have been some community members asking for less moderation. Which just goes to show that everyone has an opinion and a mindset on how they believe would be the best way to handle a situation, without actually being in the situation.
And to Age, your entire post is just phooey really, we are more then twice the size of GWO, moderators shouldn't be allowed to have an opinion? That's just ridiculous. I don't know or care how the site looks? I can guarantee you first hand I know exactly how Guru is protrayed/stereotyped/talked about or not talked about in the community. I visit daily more GW sites/guild sites/fan sites/gaming news sites then you can imagine. You can certainly take up any issue with me, as you have before... just because you don't like the answer doesn't mean I don't care.
You do do you are on more fansites than me not just Guild Wars but others as well.I am on more than you think and also clansites.I have list as long as my arm is on how many I am on which I couldn't even name them all off the top of my head.
GWIngamers may not be a big but it has the same sorts of forums that the The Guru has.When it comes to moderation even the quality has gone in that dept.I would never let my Mods do what yours are doing sure they can have unbiassed opinion without degrading of forum members.
What about that PM I sent you as you did nothing about it?Did you care then?
First off, excuse my shock at being told what I'm "too caught up in". I'm also so glad that you are the expert at knowing who exactly applies for these positions in the community.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cad92/cad92c352bf211a2d62d5d42639ab3585ff7e244" alt="Smile"
Sarcasm aside, no it's not as easy as just bringing in more mods (let alone capable mods) who I can just turn loose and trust to moderate the forum and community as needed. There is actually a learning curve, I'm sure some of the new moderators on this site can tell you that. Not to mention that in this thread alone there have been some community members asking for less moderation. Which just goes to show that everyone has an opinion and a mindset on how they believe would be the best way to handle a situation, without actually being in the situation.
And to Age, your entire post is just phooey really, we are more then twice the size of GWO, moderators shouldn't be allowed to have an opinion? That's just ridiculous. I don't know or care how the site looks? I can guarantee you first hand I know exactly how Guru is protrayed/stereotyped/talked about or not talked about in the community. I visit daily more GW sites/guild sites/fan sites/gaming news sites then you can imagine. You can certainly take up any issue with me, as you have before... just because you don't like the answer doesn't mean I don't care.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2a9a/d2a9ab4de2883b90f703283079661bfa50dacdab" alt="Big Grin"
GWIngamers may not be a big but it has the same sorts of forums that the The Guru has.When it comes to moderation even the quality has gone in that dept.I would never let my Mods do what yours are doing sure they can have unbiassed opinion without degrading of forum members.
What about that PM I sent you as you did nothing about it?Did you care then?
Hyper.nl
I still am kind of surprised by the harshness of quite some of the Guru members here. I'm active in many forums, including gaming forums but I don't see anything to the degree of general rudeness here.
What we need to understand is the diversity of the posters, and try to keep respect for each other, even if they don't behave as you like it to see. For example, if someone makes a suggestion in Sardelac that has been made x times before you can post one of the many "/fail" pictures but that does not really contribute. Better is to politely tell that it has been suggested before with links to the appropriate threads. If you don't want to make this effort, just leave the thread alone and let the mods do their job.
If you are bored with Guild Wars after x000 hours, just leave it alone for some time. There are plenty of other games around. (Of which many will not provide as much quality and playing time as Guild Wars imo.) Trolling around at Guru about the fact that it was better in 2005 will not help you anything.
It also could help if the forum software would not reward titles just for post count but also on quality of the posts. I've seen implementations where every registered forum member can vote for the quality and helpfulness of every single post and with it only reward posts that contribute to the discussion.
Example:
-1 points for rude rude posts, trolls, flames etc.
0 points for posts that do not contribute, like posting "/signed" without explanation.
1 point for general posts
2 or more points for helpful, good interesting (etc.) posts.
What we need to understand is the diversity of the posters, and try to keep respect for each other, even if they don't behave as you like it to see. For example, if someone makes a suggestion in Sardelac that has been made x times before you can post one of the many "/fail" pictures but that does not really contribute. Better is to politely tell that it has been suggested before with links to the appropriate threads. If you don't want to make this effort, just leave the thread alone and let the mods do their job.
If you are bored with Guild Wars after x000 hours, just leave it alone for some time. There are plenty of other games around. (Of which many will not provide as much quality and playing time as Guild Wars imo.) Trolling around at Guru about the fact that it was better in 2005 will not help you anything.
It also could help if the forum software would not reward titles just for post count but also on quality of the posts. I've seen implementations where every registered forum member can vote for the quality and helpfulness of every single post and with it only reward posts that contribute to the discussion.
Example:
-1 points for rude rude posts, trolls, flames etc.
0 points for posts that do not contribute, like posting "/signed" without explanation.
1 point for general posts
2 or more points for helpful, good interesting (etc.) posts.
Avarre
A 'quality' vote system requires that the general community is capable of telling what is quality and what is not. It is my view that the player level on this forum is incapable of that. It would turn into 'who says things the nicest' or 'who makes the most irrelevant witty lolcomments'.
I've been sitting around doing nothing important today, so I have an excess of ire built up. So now I'll address some comments regarding moderation! None of these views are anything but my own, do not contact Inde, she will not care.
Moderating (and keeping track of users in discussions before that) has allowed me to pretty much build an opinion of most posters on Guru - to the point I know from the 'last poster' notice what their post will be in most discussion threads. Allow me to expand:
The people complaining about excessive trolling on the forums are usually people who post empty opinions that clog up discussions and thus get attacked by people trying to have a serious conversation. Sometimes they aren't even bad posters, but it's not common that someone is trolled without first making themselves a target.
The people complaining moderation is cruel/bad are usually posting things that need to be moderated.
If I wanted, legitimately, to improve the quality of discussion on Guru, my first order of business would be to permanently ban about half to three-quarters of the users. I can't do that though, for obvious reasons. It would then involve a large cash sum to be delivered to players that are experienced and familiar with Guru, to bribe them into caring enough to mod. Finally, I would need to drug the ANet staff enough for them to consider making GW good enough again to attract a solid, developing playerbase.
The fact is, the majority of the good players are gone. Discussion will take a hit because of this, it's inevitable. With the game as stagnant as it is, there's not going to be an improvement without massive changes, and Guru isn't likely to do anything of that sort because it would be a disservice to the users caught in the collateral of such a change.
I've been sitting around doing nothing important today, so I have an excess of ire built up. So now I'll address some comments regarding moderation! None of these views are anything but my own, do not contact Inde, she will not care.
Moderating (and keeping track of users in discussions before that) has allowed me to pretty much build an opinion of most posters on Guru - to the point I know from the 'last poster' notice what their post will be in most discussion threads. Allow me to expand:
The people complaining about excessive trolling on the forums are usually people who post empty opinions that clog up discussions and thus get attacked by people trying to have a serious conversation. Sometimes they aren't even bad posters, but it's not common that someone is trolled without first making themselves a target.
The people complaining moderation is cruel/bad are usually posting things that need to be moderated.
If I wanted, legitimately, to improve the quality of discussion on Guru, my first order of business would be to permanently ban about half to three-quarters of the users. I can't do that though, for obvious reasons. It would then involve a large cash sum to be delivered to players that are experienced and familiar with Guru, to bribe them into caring enough to mod. Finally, I would need to drug the ANet staff enough for them to consider making GW good enough again to attract a solid, developing playerbase.
The fact is, the majority of the good players are gone. Discussion will take a hit because of this, it's inevitable. With the game as stagnant as it is, there's not going to be an improvement without massive changes, and Guru isn't likely to do anything of that sort because it would be a disservice to the users caught in the collateral of such a change.
Tatile
Perhaps getting rid of these little titles all-together could be beneficial, even if only for a test period. It may stop people from randomly spamming every thread they manage to stumble into, but, given what I've seen recently, I think not.
I must say though that I am impressed with the amount of moderation our Mods have to go through and how they handle it. The PAX Girls Panel thread would seem the right place for mass trolling and lolcatting, but Avarre and others have worked hard to keep it a decent conversation. It's good to see also that the thread has several different topics running through it that haven't yet been deleted because they don't stick to the original post. Thanks for keeping it clean.
I must say though that I am impressed with the amount of moderation our Mods have to go through and how they handle it. The PAX Girls Panel thread would seem the right place for mass trolling and lolcatting, but Avarre and others have worked hard to keep it a decent conversation. It's good to see also that the thread has several different topics running through it that haven't yet been deleted because they don't stick to the original post. Thanks for keeping it clean.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cad92/cad92c352bf211a2d62d5d42639ab3585ff7e244" alt="Smile"
ghost well you know
Quote:
Originally Posted by Age
You do do you are on more fansites than me not just Guild Wars but others as well.I am on more than you think and also clansites.I have list as long as my arm is on how many I am on which I couldn't even name them all off the top of my head.
GWIngamers may not be a big but it has the same sorts of forums that the The Guru has.When it comes to moderation even the quality has gone in that dept.I would never let my Mods do what yours are doing sure they can have unbiassed opinion without degrading of forum members.
What about that PM I sent you as you did nothing about it?Did you care then? I will say this I know there is 1 mod on here that could help out just by trying to not be so rude to people.When someone is stating something just because you don't agree and you are a mod does not give you the right to be rude.But hey they are a mod and they can do that.
I think most mods do a good job but as always theres always going to be a few people with power that think they are allowed to be justified because they are a mod.
GWIngamers may not be a big but it has the same sorts of forums that the The Guru has.When it comes to moderation even the quality has gone in that dept.I would never let my Mods do what yours are doing sure they can have unbiassed opinion without degrading of forum members.
What about that PM I sent you as you did nothing about it?Did you care then? I will say this I know there is 1 mod on here that could help out just by trying to not be so rude to people.When someone is stating something just because you don't agree and you are a mod does not give you the right to be rude.But hey they are a mod and they can do that.
I think most mods do a good job but as always theres always going to be a few people with power that think they are allowed to be justified because they are a mod.
Inde
If you feel there is a problem with a moderator then please contact me through PM and I will be happy to look into and address the situation.
Earth
Quote:
Originally Posted by Age
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3bd0a/3bd0a5c0d519ba71807ff770a0eed183e138111d" alt="Wink"
Quote: Originally Posted by Taurucis People have attempted to stalk, sexually harass, flame, and troll me, though I haven't really seen the moderators do anything about the perpetrators. (A few of those trolls are still bouncing around the IRC channel, happily trolling to their hearts' content.) Someone even claimed that he would send me a virus over IRC, though I managed to sort the issue out with the gamesurge support. Pretty sure we can't catch everything, and what you may see as trolling is something the mods don't see as trolling. Different people, different viewpoints.
Define "stalking". I don't get how you can stalk someone over a forum.
Also, IRC =! guru. Banning people from here doesn't mean we ban people from IRC, and vice versa.
Quote:
The last time I logged into IRC was, I dunno, a couple weeks ago. I didn't see anything happen to the perpetrators, so naturally I would assume that nothing happened.
Originally Posted by Taurucis
Another problem I noticed is that mods allow certain members to troll, hurl about insults, deviate from the original topic.
Not every mod... And we aren't on here 24/7, and sometimes stuff just doesn't get reported at all so we miss things.
Oh, and not trying to insult you, but have you tried GWO? You seem to really hate guru... And, knowing you, I think you'll enjoy GWO more... Once again not insulting you or anything, just that there's not much point coming here if you don't enjoy it. Taurucis
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inde
|
There's another bit of a problem - no one knows if a troll they reported got banned, or warned, or punished somehow, so they assume that the troll is able to get around the rules.
One forum I lurk in has something like this. They've got a "Ban Log" and even though that forum seems to be moderated by 12 year old kids on crack, they post when people get banned, and why said person got banned.
Quote:
IIRC a rather "well-known" member of guru insulted some person and his entire guild, I reported his post, and I'm not sure if any action was taken.
Quote: Define "stalking". I don't get how you can stalk someone over a forum. Not exactly in the way you're thinking, but he PMed me and said that he'd google everything about me and track my IP down to where I live. But I don't really care, usually the only kind of person pathetic enough to stalk someone they meet online is going to be a fat insecure little boy who I don't have to worry about.
Quote:
Also, IRC =! guru. Banning people from here doesn't mean we ban people from IRC, and vice versa.
Yeah, I know, there's one particular fruit that's still contentedly trolling IRC... Quote:
|