Shinde's epic RA videos

And no, linebacking isn't a bad tactic, but if you're spiking, you wouldn't go for the Warriors unless they're under Frenzy at that time, or there was nothing else you can spike and it makes your spike incredibly predictable which will result in failure against a team with a Monk that knows what Guardian does. I know I just wanted to provide an example and warrior came to mind. I know most decent builds come in the 1234 etc.. combo's. I use a # combo myself. It's just not nice that people bash on the sin class because most people jump out into the fray yelling somthing dumb like "Leroy jenkin's." (Just an example I have never seen that yelled into party chat or anything like it.)

Tyla wins this thread. This thread has now officialy gone to the shitter.

Someone should put it out of it's misery imo.

This thread has now officialy gone to the shitter.

Someone should put it out of it's misery imo. It was already in the shitter.

It was already in the shitter. lol, Tyla I am going to love you aren't I?

lol, Tyla I am going to love you aren't I? Well I guess I might aswell respond to your previous post.

Assassins are now next to useless in PvP. Warriors lineback and spike much better (Because they can carry 3 knockdowns, deep wound and an IAS in the same bar while keeping an extra free slot. 3 knockdowns will kill a Monk, and they can pressure alot harder even through linebacking), and Dervs have Wounding Strike and the most imbalanced weapon in the game. Dervs are also not used however.

GvG - There's nothing to use a 'Sin for when Warriors can carry knockdowns and pressure alot harder, with ViO gone and all. The same can be said with Dervs.

HA - See above, taking out the ViO bit.

TA - Not a good idea. Having a 'Sin being linebacked is almost like hitting a caster. Dervs share the same problem. Critical Defenses will easily get stripped if you're against a team that's not from RA, and with a Fortress Monk carrying Guardian you're only going to be able to do your stuff if you're running a SA 'Sin, and even then...

RA - Meh. All players are bad here but I'd rather have a Warrior over an Assassin anyway for most of the reasons above.

And yes, I do actually find it fun playing an Assassin from time to time. Sometimes I'd rather run something more efficient though.

lol @ the previous post


tbh I have won a few games after I, a monk, & a mesmer died the last person alive was a sin he had a war & another sin against him. He spiked the war kite'd away from the sin and then killed the sin in the correct hands every class is a noob class. Just admit it if you lose to them they're a noob for using an overpowered class or an overpowered build. If you win they are a noob because they lost. Just admit it people like you are just immature. Any class can be good in the right hands. Sins just get the most crap because alot of people attempt to use them and don't do so well.



lol, like I said it is possible to win out matched games if a sin is used correctly. Yes, alot of people do use them as a stepping stone into pvp. Lastly it is true that you can sit there and spam Moebius strike and drop people left and right. The problems with sins are that they're a ganking class and most people don't understand that you should either jump in after the conflict has started or be the distraction that starts the conflict. Example: A sin can either hang back pick a target that is being attacked by an ally and spike it with that ally. Or a sin can rush right into a fight the problem with that line of thinking is you need a fall back strategy which most people don't have. So next time you are considering a sin and you want to rush in just think of how you will fall back to get healed or self and you don't die right at the start of the fight. Because if you die at the begining of the fight your team is that much more likely to lose.

Also, to other people who might think that attacking the front line of an enemy team is just out right dumb. No, you are incorrect if you were in a fight against me and you were a monk would you expect me to attack you or the warrior running around cracking our skulls? You would expect us to attack you because duh your the monk you die it will be easier to kill the warrior. But if we kill the warrior first we will not have to worry about having our own monk dead before we can kill your teams monk. So you might be the better monk but we killed your meat shield and all that is left for us to drop is you so think out side of the box. Next time don't just bash peoples heads in give constructive criticism it wont kill you or at least I hope it wouldn't. soo.... you're trying to say that assassins are good at killing bad player while being played by a bad player? gee, that's exactly what i said. thanks for agreeing.