Any thoughts on a title featuring number of different animals tamed and leveled to 20?
I think there are nearly 30 tameable animals across all games, I know I have leveled 10 or more pets to 20 (including ranger heroes). This would give me a reason to bring the Ranger out to play again.
Beast Master title?
KIDGOOCH
Ariena Najea
Technically being a Ranger wouldn't help the progression of this title, as Beast Mastery doesn't affect the rate of experience gaining. With this in mind... maybe.
An interesting idea, but it would become a horrible grind title in no time. Think about it, as soon as you change pets, all of your work on the previous pet is meaningless except for the title. Perhaps if it was account-wide this would not be an issue, and maybe help encourage a few players to buy more character slots, who knows.
Again it's interesting, but would be misconstrued to be a Ranger specific or favored title and add more grind to the game. As such, I do not support this suggestion in its current form.
An interesting idea, but it would become a horrible grind title in no time. Think about it, as soon as you change pets, all of your work on the previous pet is meaningless except for the title. Perhaps if it was account-wide this would not be an issue, and maybe help encourage a few players to buy more character slots, who knows.
Again it's interesting, but would be misconstrued to be a Ranger specific or favored title and add more grind to the game. As such, I do not support this suggestion in its current form.
ele pl
Hmmzor, i never thought about that. This really might be interesting.
MagmaRed
Not available to people playing classes other than Ranger unless they go x/R just for a pet. And if you mean to tell me a Mo/R using a pet and healing a team is effective, you suck.
We do not need more titles, and this one is biased on class requirement.
/unsigned
We do not need more titles, and this one is biased on class requirement.
/unsigned
DarkGanni
/notsigned
I don't have to explain why.
I don't have to explain why.
Eragon Zarroc
it sounds slightly interesting but all-in-all just a pointless grind.
mathiastemplar
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MagmaRed
Not available to people playing classes other than Ranger unless they go x/R just for a pet. And if you mean to tell me a Mo/R using a pet and healing a team is effective, you suck.
We do not need more titles, and this one is biased on class requirement. /unsigned |
/signed for creativity
Simath
/notsigned
Lets level a shit load of pets to level 20. No thanks.
Lets level a shit load of pets to level 20. No thanks.
Ichi The Shadow
Not a bad idea but you would have to change a few things...I would suggest adding an npc, perhaps in your hall that allows you to switch between different lvl 20 pets. This way if you felt like breaking out any of the pets that you have charmed and leveled to 20. I do not believe that this title would be biased to rangers because how many rangers actually use beast mastery in the first place now days? In addition Leveling ur pets isn't usually do in teams anyway so who cares if ur a Mo/R.... In addition Anet already has forced people to take all secondary professions if you are doing the skill hunting title so I don't see how you can honestly say it is biased to the ranger profession since beast mastery is not a primary attribute.
That being said the idea fails because we do not need any more mindless grinding or titles the 26 PVE based titles are enough thank you.
/Unsigned
That being said the idea fails because we do not need any more mindless grinding or titles the 26 PVE based titles are enough thank you.
/Unsigned
Arduin
Even as a primary Ranger, I've never played a beastmaster build before, because it's just plain boring. Leveling all those pets to level 20 is just useless grinding.
Skyy High
Cute idea, I'd much rather have this than titles like sweet tooth, but we already have a glut of titles.
Unreal Havoc
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MagmaRed
Not available to people playing classes other than Ranger unless they go x/R just for a pet. And if you mean to tell me a Mo/R using a pet and healing a team is effective, you suck.
|
Quote:
| We do not need more titles, and this one is biased on class requirement |
Signed if more options were given in relation to pets, maybe a stable of some kind perhaps for a start.
As for grinding, a decent player could probably do this within a week at the most.
Enon
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mathiastemplar
U could just tame the pet, and go back to mo/w or whatever..
|
Agreed with MagmaRed.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Unreal Havoc
You mean secondary proffession requirement? Pretty sure anyone can go /R once they have ascended, not really biased at all.
|
Kook~NBK~
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Enon
... While a Ranger can run any build, he just has to sacrifice one skill slot to Charm Animal, a */R can't. They are bound to use a Ranger's secondary, which is useless for most professions.
|
As for the OP's suggestion: /not signed. It'd be too easy to achieve in conjunction with other titles such as Vanquishing, Cartography, Protector, etc. (But it would be kinda fun to do just to say "I did it.")
Unreal Havoc
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Enon
I don't completely agree with that. All though everyone is able to get */R, a R/* has an advantage over the rest. While a Ranger can run any build, he just has to sacrifice one skill slot to Charm Animal, a */R can't. They are bound to use a Ranger's secondary, which is useless for most professions.
|
I look at it like this. I can go into said explorable area with my heroes and hench, find the pet, flag heroes and death level it, then charm it. Pet acquired with very little effort. How hard is that? How does that gimp my bar in any way when my primary goal is to capture death levelled pet in the easiest manner possible? I don't need any other secondary proffession, neither does anyone else with common sense, if you do then it adds to the challenge of the title.
If you want to charm a pet with your character you will always have to go Ranger secondary (and most people do charm a pet at some point with their main whether they care to admit it or not), it makes absolutely no difference, all that matters is that it's available to everyone to achieve, which it is. I mean you'll be complaining about acquiring Legendary Survivor with a caster because they have lower armour than a Warrior or Paragon, surely that gimps you? No?
You're acting like the only way to level up your pet is to use it in missions and elite areas where running it outside of a pet team build would be an issue. That is not the case, neither is this even hard to implement.
tal raasha
i can solo farm nm minotaur with e/x with just 5 skills
level'ed a pet to 20 in this way in 30 minutes
having a title like this is pointless
level'ed a pet to 20 in this way in 30 minutes
having a title like this is pointless
Enon
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kook~NBK~
Actually, a mid or back line profession can equip Charm Animal only. Just be sure to set the pet to "Heel" and it will pretty much stay out of combat.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Unreal Havoc
I look at it like this. I can go into said explorable area with my heroes and hench, find the pet, flag heroes and death level it, then charm it.
|
If this title does get implemented, which it probably won't anyway, I wouldn't want to death level my pet. I would simply want to take it with me on missions, vanquishes etc. From this point of view a Ranger has an advantages over any other profession, because it's not being forced to use the Ranger secondary, which is useless for casters.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Unreal Havoc
I mean you'll be complaining about acquiring Legendary Survivor with a caster because they have lower armour than a Warrior or Paragon, surely that gimps you? No?
|
Try to think outside the box for once, cupcake. Not everybody does things your way.
Unreal Havoc
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Enon
Unlike you, some people like to play the game the normal way, rather than death leveling a pet or (ab)using brawling to get to LS.
|
Quote:
| If this title does get implemented, which it probably won't anyway, I wouldn't want to death level my pet. I would simply want to take it with me on missions, vanquishes etc. From this point of view a Ranger has an advantages over any other profession, because it's not being forced to use the Ranger secondary, which is useless for casters. |
Quote:
| No, because the different profession do not only have different armours, they also have different roles in the game play. |
Now you're starting to get the hang of it. Some classes are much easier than others to level up as Legendary Survivors, alot of things can be taken into account for that, I just named one thing.
Quote:
| Try to think outside the box for once, cupcake. Not everybody does things your way. |
KamikazeChicken
I honestly don't care. I don't have a chance to get Survivor or LDoA, but at least with this I wouldn't have to max Kurzick, not that it's a good idea for a title. >.>
MStarfire
/notsigned. I can level a pet to 20 in about an hour. I'd max this title in 2 days.
No more titles on silver platters, please.
No more titles on silver platters, please.
stevedallas
/signed
i think this would be a fun title to pursue
i think this would be a fun title to pursue
Aldric
/notsigned
I'm a Ranger primary and have chopped and changed pets a bit and getting a pet to lvl20 takes 30mins or so. This title would result in nothing more than a days work to max and get back to my favoured Polar Bear.
I know some people would run the pets through to lvl20 via the game but for another free and easy title the majority of people would just max it the same as me ,then forget it and never use a pet again.
I'm a Ranger primary and have chopped and changed pets a bit and getting a pet to lvl20 takes 30mins or so. This title would result in nothing more than a days work to max and get back to my favoured Polar Bear.
I know some people would run the pets through to lvl20 via the game but for another free and easy title the majority of people would just max it the same as me ,then forget it and never use a pet again.
Chthon
I would rather have a Stablemaster NPC. I'd be happy with the title in addition to the Stablemaster though.
Hailey Anne
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MagmaRed
Not available to people playing classes other than Ranger unless they go x/R just for a pet. And if you mean to tell me a Mo/R using a pet and healing a team is effective, you suck.
We do not need more titles, and this one is biased on class requirement. /unsigned |
Youre reasoning for a no sign is horrible as usual.
First just because a Mo/R tames a pet doesnt mean they will be running around all the time with it.
Second this isnt biased in the least. Beast mastery is not primary attribute therefore can be used effectively by ANY class.
Third who says a monk has to heal anyway? Ever thought maybe they have beated things enough times that they want to mix it up a bit? Probably not since you are so quick to /no sign everything and tell people they suck or how horrible they are.
/still notsigned from me evern though I really disagree with this reasoning.
warrior running
/notsigned no reason for this
_Nihilist_
/signed
*on the condition that a Stablemaster or equivalent NPC was added, or better, if you could add your pet in the Party Menu like you can with Heroes (where DO those Heroes go when I'm not using them? Are pets THAT different in regards to having MULTIPLE choices but limited slots for them, or keeping their own separate levels until they gain more XP? NO, THEY AREN'T. Pets even have a mini-bar that acts like a Hero's skillbar (O.o)), provided that you had Charm Animal on your skillbar so that I didn't have to level them just to give them to a Tamer and never see them again so I could get the next Pet and train it to do the same thing.
*on the condition that a Stablemaster or equivalent NPC was added, or better, if you could add your pet in the Party Menu like you can with Heroes (where DO those Heroes go when I'm not using them? Are pets THAT different in regards to having MULTIPLE choices but limited slots for them, or keeping their own separate levels until they gain more XP? NO, THEY AREN'T. Pets even have a mini-bar that acts like a Hero's skillbar (O.o)), provided that you had Charm Animal on your skillbar so that I didn't have to level them just to give them to a Tamer and never see them again so I could get the next Pet and train it to do the same thing.
Leona
/notsigned.
Titles are supposed to be about something that you do in the game (for fun already,) to show off either your tremendous waste of time and effort achieving something else (which does include, notably, getting hammered or buzzed in the guild hall so much that it incurs Lordly wrath) or your good, profitable use of time and energy (like the Deep and Warren titles, or something.) Grindtastic titles get kicked in the throat by angry Gurumites as is, and we don't need any more,specially something as silly and neurotic as pet-training, an exercise fully futile for anyone other than a Ranger. (Possible? Yes. of any use? No.) Even for a Ranger, having a pet is of questionable use in most circumstances, especially the non-gimmicky (Lordrush, I'm looking at you.)
Titles are supposed to be about something that you do in the game (for fun already,) to show off either your tremendous waste of time and effort achieving something else (which does include, notably, getting hammered or buzzed in the guild hall so much that it incurs Lordly wrath) or your good, profitable use of time and energy (like the Deep and Warren titles, or something.) Grindtastic titles get kicked in the throat by angry Gurumites as is, and we don't need any more,specially something as silly and neurotic as pet-training, an exercise fully futile for anyone other than a Ranger. (Possible? Yes. of any use? No.) Even for a Ranger, having a pet is of questionable use in most circumstances, especially the non-gimmicky (Lordrush, I'm looking at you.)
pumpkin pie
/signed if it comes with a stable
credit
uhm lol?
/notsigned for obvious reasons.
/notsigned for obvious reasons.
Unreal Havoc
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Leona
/notsigned.
Titles are supposed to be about something that you do in the game (for fun already,) to show off either your tremendous waste of time and effort achieving something else (which does include, notably, getting hammered or buzzed in the guild hall so much that it incurs Lordly wrath) or your good, profitable use of time and energy (like the Deep and Warren titles, or something.) Grindtastic titles get kicked in the throat by angry Gurumites as is, and we don't need any more,specially something as silly and neurotic as pet-training, an exercise fully futile for anyone other than a Ranger. (Possible? Yes. of any use? No.) Even for a Ranger, having a pet is of questionable use in most circumstances, especially the non-gimmicky (Lordrush, I'm looking at you.) |
I agree that it would be pretty easy to achieve compared to other titles, not that that is nessacarily a bad thing, except maybe to those who like to stroke their E-peen because they think their titles actually mean something to other gamers, but half the reasons I've read against it so far are lolworthy.
Nathaniel (Was 'ere)
/Signed.
If they bring a pet barn etc. out in GW 2 then this'd be a good title. As for now, I don't really want to get rid of my pet. I <3 him.
If they bring a pet barn etc. out in GW 2 then this'd be a good title. As for now, I don't really want to get rid of my pet. I <3 him.
Wubbies
/notsigned.... great more silly titles..might as well hang out with those worthless people that use yeti tonics and make more noise..so annoying like another title.
MithranArkanere
A title for a single profession...?
I see...
No.
It's bad enough to have a title that can be obtained only by characters of a campaign or a title that can be tried only once.
No need for more bad titles. Only the questing title is left. Only that one.
I see...
No.
It's bad enough to have a title that can be obtained only by characters of a campaign or a title that can be tried only once.
No need for more bad titles. Only the questing title is left. Only that one.
Nathaniel (Was 'ere)
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MithranArkanere
A title for a single profession...?
I see... No. It's bad enough to have a title that can be obtained only by characters of a campaign or a title that can be tried only once. No need for more bad titles. Only the questing title is left. Only that one. |
MithranArkanere
Yeah, and resurrections for monks?
No.
Titles should be for doing something you do while playing, not for doing something you can repeat again and again, forgetting about the rest of the game.
The Wisdom and Treasure hunter where changed so people could go for them while playing, without having to stick to one character.
So no.
No.
Titles should be for doing something you do while playing, not for doing something you can repeat again and again, forgetting about the rest of the game.
The Wisdom and Treasure hunter where changed so people could go for them while playing, without having to stick to one character.
So no.