S
Hi - This is a good dervish build, stop asking if yours is.
3 pages • Page 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lusciious
@vendetta, dervs aren't casters so i don't see why you need 6-8 energy regen.
You mentioned energy management. ;3
M
Quote:
Originally Posted by MegaVolti
Why do you always take the critical damage? It will rarely ever happen.
I could just as easily say:
Auto attack minimal damage: 9
Auto attack minimal damage with [[Asuran scan]: 13
Victorious sweep: 38 (= 9 + 29)
Obviously [[Victorious Sweep] is stronger then the Scan
Yes I know this calculation is wrong, but so is yours. Actually mine is a little closer to the truth then yours 
Of cause, if you always assume a critical strike then the +% from [[asuran scan] will beat anything, but that's simply not the case in the game. I find it funny that you waited over a month before coming up with your own numbers to try and prove your side of the argument.
Also my numbers are not "wrong" they are optimistic there is a difference.
If you're not convinced that's fine.
Why do you always take the critical damage? It will rarely ever happen.I could just as easily say:
Auto attack minimal damage: 9
Auto attack minimal damage with [[Asuran scan]: 13
Victorious sweep: 38 (= 9 + 29)
Obviously [[Victorious Sweep] is stronger then the Scan
Yes I know this calculation is wrong, but so is yours. Actually mine is a little closer to the truth then yours 
Of cause, if you always assume a critical strike then the +% from [[asuran scan] will beat anything, but that's simply not the case in the game. I find it funny that you waited over a month before coming up with your own numbers to try and prove your side of the argument.
Also my numbers are not "wrong" they are optimistic there is a difference.
If you're not convinced that's fine.
Quote:
|
Asuran Scan is not always useful considering you're not trying for single-target spikes in PvE.
You will always be hitting at least one target, hitting more then one target is just a bonus of using a scythe and if you can kill even one of those targets faster then I'm for that. I find that in HM removing priority targets is key, annoying healers, or ele's that do crazy AoE thats where Asuran scan really shines. |
M
M
Lol. You are funny 
First, [[Conjure Flame] or any other conjure don't really do well with [[aura of holy might].
Second, as you have proven yourself by posting these numbers, your "test setup" is completely unrealistic and will about never happen in any even remotely real situation.
And still you assume criticals with every hit which isn't even remotely realistic. Hint: You can only bring 3 PvE skills, one of which has to be [[eternal aura] since we are talking about avatar builds here.
So yes, it's all fiction.

First, [[Conjure Flame] or any other conjure don't really do well with [[aura of holy might].
Second, as you have proven yourself by posting these numbers, your "test setup" is completely unrealistic and will about never happen in any even remotely real situation.
And still you assume criticals with every hit which isn't even remotely realistic. Hint: You can only bring 3 PvE skills, one of which has to be [[eternal aura] since we are talking about avatar builds here.
So yes, it's all fiction.
M
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkside
Had you even bothered to look at my post you would notice that; Oh hey she never put Conjure flame and Aura of Holy Might together for the damage test. So your first great point is gone... great job. Don't bother joining a debate team definitely not your thing.
The point of my test was to show the highest possible damage and obviously unless you are a complete moron you can figure out on your own that you will not be getting a critical on every single attack, but that overall average attack damage will still be increased whether you get a critical attack or not.
As for your "hint" I was talking about a wounding strike build not an avatar build so again that wonderful "hint" of yours is full of stupid. The highest possible damage in one hit is completely and utterly irrelevant in our discussion.
You say: Auto attack + Asuran scan is better
I say: Victorious Sweep is better
You are just wrong. On average damage, meaning DPS, Victorious Sweep will do a lot more donus damage then Asuran Scan.
Yes, if you critical against an AL60 target then Asuran Scan wins. But we are talking about builds for "real" situations here and in HM you will neither find AL60 targets not will you get a critical strike very often (chances vs high lvel targets are considerably lower).
Your calculation is completely pointless.
Had you even bothered to look at my post you would notice that; Oh hey she never put Conjure flame and Aura of Holy Might together for the damage test. So your first great point is gone... great job. Don't bother joining a debate team definitely not your thing.The point of my test was to show the highest possible damage and obviously unless you are a complete moron you can figure out on your own that you will not be getting a critical on every single attack, but that overall average attack damage will still be increased whether you get a critical attack or not.
As for your "hint" I was talking about a wounding strike build not an avatar build so again that wonderful "hint" of yours is full of stupid. The highest possible damage in one hit is completely and utterly irrelevant in our discussion.
You say: Auto attack + Asuran scan is better
I say: Victorious Sweep is better
You are just wrong. On average damage, meaning DPS, Victorious Sweep will do a lot more donus damage then Asuran Scan.
Yes, if you critical against an AL60 target then Asuran Scan wins. But we are talking about builds for "real" situations here and in HM you will neither find AL60 targets not will you get a critical strike very often (chances vs high lvel targets are considerably lower).
Your calculation is completely pointless.
A
g
L
Quote:
Originally Posted by MegaVolti
...in HM you will neither find AL60 targets...
I thought normal monster AL was the same, you just don't do the same damage because of the increased difference in levels.
...in HM you will neither find AL60 targets...
I thought normal monster AL was the same, you just don't do the same damage because of the increased difference in levels.Quote:
|
Here's my solution: Switch to war, run DS/SY! + BH + Steelfang Slash. ![]() My solution... have both a Warrior and a Dervish. Swap to one when you feel bored with the other. This thread has me thinking that my recently neglected Derv needs some love. *runs off to try Melandru builds* |
M
J
Quote:
Originally Posted by MegaVolti
The highest possible damage in one hit is completely and utterly irrelevant in our discussion.
You say: Auto attack + Asuran scan is better
I say: Victorious Sweep is better
You are just wrong. On average damage, meaning DPS, Victorious Sweep will do a lot more donus damage then Asuran Scan.
Yes, if you critical against an AL60 target then Asuran Scan wins. But we are talking about builds for "real" situations here and in HM you will neither find AL60 targets not will you get a critical strike very often (chances vs high lvel targets are considerably lower).
Your calculation is completely pointless. You did make this claim, you know.
The highest possible damage in one hit is completely and utterly irrelevant in our discussion.You say: Auto attack + Asuran scan is better
I say: Victorious Sweep is better
You are just wrong. On average damage, meaning DPS, Victorious Sweep will do a lot more donus damage then Asuran Scan.
Yes, if you critical against an AL60 target then Asuran Scan wins. But we are talking about builds for "real" situations here and in HM you will neither find AL60 targets not will you get a critical strike very often (chances vs high lvel targets are considerably lower).
Your calculation is completely pointless. You did make this claim, you know.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MegaVolti
"Optimistic" is just plain wrong. Imaginary would be the right word. There is nothing even remotely realistic about your numbers. For a real comparison you have to take average damage and not max damage. Average damage of a scythe 25. With high mastery the critical chance is only about 20%, which increases the average damage to about 30. That's nowhere near the 86 you claim. In fact the 86 is wrong, even if you could critical with every hit. Critical means max damage (which is 41) and 50% bonus damage, so you end up with about 60 for a critical and not 86. Therefore his calculation proves you wrong. |
L
Quote:
Originally Posted by MegaVolti
Monsters have the normal armor plus something like 3 (I'm not 100% sure of the number, can anybody confirm this?) for every level above 20. Since lvl 26 to 28 foes are very common, armor levels are quite high in HM.
I see. Thanks. That makes sense, I just never gave it much thought, I guess. The most HM I've done has been farming and vanquishing with Sabway/Discord necros, so I just never paid much attention to the effects of damage reduction. I figured lower damage was mostly from level difference.
As for the OP AoM build, I gave it a tryout. My Derv hasn't got Asura Scan yet, so I wasn't running that. But that's beside the point, I can see the concerns over energy because I felt like the build was a lot to handle with AoM, and the two 10e enchantments. I took a N/Mo with Patient Spirit and Dark Fury. I'd cast AoM just before aggro, target myself and click the hero's bar for Patient Spirit/Dark Fury/Patient Spirit to get some energy back for the fight, but then casting AoHM and Eternal Aura once into battle and it's a big energy drop again. It works well (really nice for the Norn area mandragors), but felt like it required too much micro management.
Quote:
Monsters have the normal armor plus something like 3 (I'm not 100% sure of the number, can anybody confirm this?) for every level above 20. Since lvl 26 to 28 foes are very common, armor levels are quite high in HM.
I see. Thanks. That makes sense, I just never gave it much thought, I guess. The most HM I've done has been farming and vanquishing with Sabway/Discord necros, so I just never paid much attention to the effects of damage reduction. I figured lower damage was mostly from level difference.As for the OP AoM build, I gave it a tryout. My Derv hasn't got Asura Scan yet, so I wasn't running that. But that's beside the point, I can see the concerns over energy because I felt like the build was a lot to handle with AoM, and the two 10e enchantments. I took a N/Mo with Patient Spirit and Dark Fury. I'd cast AoM just before aggro, target myself and click the hero's bar for Patient Spirit/Dark Fury/Patient Spirit to get some energy back for the fight, but then casting AoHM and Eternal Aura once into battle and it's a big energy drop again. It works well (really nice for the Norn area mandragors), but felt like it required too much micro management.
Quote:
M
http://guildwars.wikia.com/wiki/Aura_of_holy_might
See the anomaly: It is changed to holy damage. In other languages the description also says so.
Try going with an orders Necromancer and a [[Patient Spirit] Monk, that should solve all energy problems.
Quote: Originally Posted by Jeydra
See the anomaly: It is changed to holy damage. In other languages the description also says so.
Try going with an orders Necromancer and a [[Patient Spirit] Monk, that should solve all energy problems.
Quote: Originally Posted by Jeydra
You did make this claim, you know.
Therefore his calculation proves you wrong. My claim was that an additional attack skill (as opposed to auto attacking most of the time) is more efficient then bringing [[Asuran Scan] due to the fact that the attack skill will hit 3 enemies if positioned right while [[Asuran Scan] will only work on the main target. On top of that the scan doesn't do much for auto attacks since they do almost no damage in HM and 80% more of almost nothing is still almost nothing.
His calculation has nothing whatsoever to do with this. All he did is invent strange magical numbers.
No, his calculations don't prove me wrong. They can't because I simply am right.
Therefore his calculation proves you wrong. My claim was that an additional attack skill (as opposed to auto attacking most of the time) is more efficient then bringing [[Asuran Scan] due to the fact that the attack skill will hit 3 enemies if positioned right while [[Asuran Scan] will only work on the main target. On top of that the scan doesn't do much for auto attacks since they do almost no damage in HM and 80% more of almost nothing is still almost nothing.
His calculation has nothing whatsoever to do with this. All he did is invent strange magical numbers.
No, his calculations don't prove me wrong. They can't because I simply am right.
J
Quote:
Originally Posted by MegaVolti
"Optimistic" is just plain wrong. Imaginary would be the right word. There is nothing even remotely realistic about your numbers.
For a real comparison you have to take average damage and not max damage. Average damage of a scythe 25. With high mastery the critical chance is only about 20%, which increases the average damage to about 30. That's nowhere near the 86 you claim. In fact the 86 is wrong, even if you could critical with every hit. Critical means max damage (which is 41) and 50% bonus damage, so you end up with about 60 for a critical and not 86. Don't disown what you have claimed. He proved you wrong, end of story. Should I point out too that you didn't mention HM armor? Furthermore, if you did have HM armor in mind, you would undoubtedly have pointed it out now ...
For a real comparison you have to take average damage and not max damage. Average damage of a scythe 25. With high mastery the critical chance is only about 20%, which increases the average damage to about 30. That's nowhere near the 86 you claim. In fact the 86 is wrong, even if you could critical with every hit. Critical means max damage (which is 41) and 50% bonus damage, so you end up with about 60 for a critical and not 86. Don't disown what you have claimed. He proved you wrong, end of story. Should I point out too that you didn't mention HM armor? Furthermore, if you did have HM armor in mind, you would undoubtedly have pointed it out now ...
M
J
You said it is impossible to critical for 86. He criticals for 86. Happy?
I bet you will rant and rave and protest that this is out of your point. Doesn't matter. You claimed it is impossible to critical for 86. You then claimed that 86 is sheer imagination. You even came up with your own calculation saying you should crit for 60+, not 86, and finally you proceeded to call Darkside's test 'fiction'. He then provided more numbers proving you critical for 86, making him right and you wrong. End of story. Darkside wins this argument. You can keep protesting if you want, but the way you botched up something so basic kind of ruins your credibility.
I bet you will rant and rave and protest that this is out of your point. Doesn't matter. You claimed it is impossible to critical for 86. You then claimed that 86 is sheer imagination. You even came up with your own calculation saying you should crit for 60+, not 86, and finally you proceeded to call Darkside's test 'fiction'. He then provided more numbers proving you critical for 86, making him right and you wrong. End of story. Darkside wins this argument. You can keep protesting if you want, but the way you botched up something so basic kind of ruins your credibility.

