K this discussion got thrown off a bit in the course of some PM's (thank you Nightow!), but the overall message is that PC Gamer posted about the "Top MMO's You've Got To Try" and Guild Wars made the list.
I disagree with the list, the fact that Lineage/2 or FFXI didn't make the list is topic for discussion since they both have #'s higher then some of the other MMO's listed.
Just to clarify the message above though, because this is a valid discussion, with more information from the thread and the PC Gamer mag:
Quote:
....I have the PC gamer issue in question and the OP is mistaken about the game rankings. The magazine never ranked these games, there are no numbers next to the games....for some reason the OP chose to rank them from the lower right to upper left of the page, reading right to left. If one takes even a moment to look at the article, you can see they were listed ALPHABETICALLY, reading from top to bottom.
|
This quote is also interesting in regards to the piece:
Quote:
I think some people are missing the point about the PC Gamer "MMOs You've Got To Try" list. I took another look at this month's PC Gamer, and in the fine print I saw the word "advertorial." Which means that all the big MMOG companies - Blizzard, NCSoft, Sony, EA, etc - paid PC Gamer money to get their games listed among the "best" MMOGs on the market. Really, PC Gamer is not making any true distinctions between the games, but hyping them equally since their developers essentially took out a giant ad. Heck, Guild Wars gets to be an "MMOG" because ArenaNet (or NCSoft) paid for their placement on the list.
In the very same issue, PC Gamer rates WOW as best massively multiplayer game of the year, and then goes on to list a crazy list of stats like how the WOW nation has more players than the country of Greece has citizens. It's obviously clear that the staff view WOW as the end all and be all of MMOG s.
|
The implication that ArenaNet/NCSoft actually paid for some marketing... hmmm I'm not too sure about that. Could be wrong.