Quote:
Originally Posted by Fril Estelin
The way most AV work make it so that you need significant rewrite to escape heuristics. And I'm not even mentioning SW profiles and behaviour.
|
I'm highly skeptical of this, having coded high-level language assembers, as well as multi-threaded OS's. Perhaps the AV scanners finally use dis-assemblers and look for certain signatures, but it's more than simple to add memory/register swaps and use different registers to fool them, as well as simply changing more efficient instruction combinatorics for less efficient ones (or vice versa)... I'm betting adding buttloads of assy (conditional) jumpcodes fool most scanners, but I've not done a lot with detection. An 8k vs 20k vs 60k vs 640k keylogger gives a lot of room for *fudge*... I'm also suspicious of your use of the term "heuristics", having developed them for AI routines, but whatever (I suppose people still consider spam filters to be AI)...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fril Estelin
Where did you learn hacking 101? All modern compilers prevent most buffer overflows, and even if you had one on the GW servers, you wouldn't use it to swap sessions...
|
Did I not say *SOMETHING LIKE*? (checking...) "AKIN." As in, similar. How do you think most exploits of servers are found? Usually by sending strings of (more-or-less) random gibberish, and hoping that one of them causes the server to JMP (or fall through) to unexecutable (or out of range, or different range) code.
Who said *YOU* are the one swapping sessions? This may be the result of unintended faulty server-side code. As in, some session variable that should be CONST somehow gets overwritten by unintention, thus setting it to point elsewhere (merits of C++? LOL)...
101? Nice, Thx for the flames. You make the bad assumption that the in-house add-hoc compiler used by GW coders is *MODERN* (or complete, consistent, "peer-reviewed", etc). Are you going to jump my ass in this thread (like the other one) based on some technicality? Did I NOT say 2 was unlikely? (checking...) "QUITE A STRETCH." Pls, take the flames to private chat in the future.