Logitech G15 Keyboard Macro Warning
Vulkanyaz
xDusT II
Out of curiosity is there any way Anet can actually detect you using a macro? I have a few macros that hold down CTRL or ALT all game or that automatically Foul Feast off players 1 and 2 and just from observation it would be impossible to tell whether I was using a macro or just performing the actions myself. How exactly can ANet detect these forms of macros?
pumpkin pie
Quote:
I am glad to hear you say that as I still haven't figured it out yet. I do like the lighted keyboard so I can play with the lights out.
|
Quote:
Out of curiosity is there any way Anet can actually detect you using a macro? I have a few macros that hold down CTRL or ALT all game or that automatically Foul Feast off players 1 and 2 and just from observation it would be impossible to tell whether I was using a macro or just performing the actions myself. How exactly can ANet detect these forms of macros?
|
and why does my computer make this weird scratching sounds.
Another Question
After your character is outside of town, and you use your G15 macros to play the game, how exactly does Anet tell weather yours using macros or not? i mean when yours out of the town your on your own instance. right.
Bill Clinton
Quote:
Anyone here played Nightfall?
The Tihark Orchard Mission has a portion that requires you to match emotes at a rapid pace. Touch typing, or more importantly, bound emotes, give you a distinct advantage. So even binding emotes can give you a gameplay advantage. That doesn't include holiday quests (Elder Nofunn). Banned. Grey areas are unacceptable. Anet needs to explicitly state what is not allowed. Everything else needs to be. If something is being abused, they need to add it to the 'not allowed' list, give everyone a week to comply, then ban them. Short scripts that combine a few commands or keystrokes are no more of an advantage than VoIP or a Mouse with extra keys. Or even some poor sod who is unemployed and has hours to bone up on his PVP skillz. Some people could have the fastest machine with a G15 and a G5 Mouse and a T3 connection with no lag and still suck. Others could play GW on a solar powered 4 function calculator and pwn everyone. Such is life. |
I think you're completely missing the reason why there is this part of the EULA. And a lot of other people are, too.
Its not actually about whether one person is given advantage advantage over another.
You've said it yourself - there are tonnes of things that can make someone more advantaged over someone else - it would be incredibly ridiculous to actually make a rule to try and keep people on a 'level playing field' when there are so many other uncontrolable factors that make it 'unlevel'
No, this is to make sure people are playing the game. As simple as that. Yes, someone who sets up his G15 to keg farm while he has a beer down the pub is obviously going to advantaged over other players in the monetary department - but its not about that. Its not about people getting butthurt.
And when we realise that, we also realise there are a lot fewer grey areas than everyones maing out. Mapping emotes to a key is fine. You are playing the game. As are many other things.
immortius
pumpkin pie
immortius
In practice the server probably records a whole bunch of information on how a player acts, and some program analyses these statistics for signs of automation - at least as a first pass.
Chocobo1
How is that a troll? Everything he listed could be counted as an advantage. GWG are far too eager to call people trolls, I doubt you even know what a troll is, except for it's someone who has a different opinion to you -_-;.
The only real use for a macro keyboard I could see would be binding /stuck to a command for HA running or certain farms. Other than that it's useless or it's banworthy.
The only real use for a macro keyboard I could see would be binding /stuck to a command for HA running or certain farms. Other than that it's useless or it's banworthy.
MisterB
ANet has bots checking the server logs for bots. Basically.
Enon
Quote:
I sympathise, Ulyria - the usage of macros has always been a grey area at best.
|
Got what you deserved, cheater.
Messy
Quote:
So where does she say this? If you're referring to http://wiki.guildwars.com/wiki/User_..._ask_something then if you read it she says the opposite, that they do not ban for GWx2 or using two accounts at the same time.
|
Quote:
Thank you for the excellent breakdown of questions related to the use of dual-account systems or programs such as GWx2. I can tell you that the 8th question, regarding using two separate machines for muling between separate accounts is definite allowed. I do it personally and I asked years ago about its permissability, so there's no question in my mind it's ok. As for each of the other questions, I must get an official answer for you. |
Quote:
8. Is it ok to use 2 separate machines to simply transfer things between accounts (muling)? |
Quote:
7. Is it ok to uwe GWx2 to simply transfer things between accounts (muling)? |
Empress Amarox
I'd just like to say I agree. I didn't think you were trolling whatsoever.
---
And all this GWx2 crap scares me... I don't use a program, I hex edit my GW and modify registry to run 2 copies (because I'm paranoid and don't trust 3rd party programs), but it's still the same thing basically.
Getting banned only for muling and transferring stuff across my own accounts would suck the big one - or a couple of them at the same time given all my accounts...
---
And all this GWx2 crap scares me... I don't use a program, I hex edit my GW and modify registry to run 2 copies (because I'm paranoid and don't trust 3rd party programs), but it's still the same thing basically.
Getting banned only for muling and transferring stuff across my own accounts would suck the big one - or a couple of them at the same time given all my accounts...
fusa
Quote:
Actually that is not what she says.... somebody posted 8 possible scenarios that involve 2 accounts, some with GWx2, some with 2 machines, some with 2 players. What Gaile said was |
The fear mongering over GWx2 and Logitech G15 is extremely ignorant. If anyone has any common sense they can use both with out being banned. Most of the people whining are just idiots who cant play a game without using a program to play for them. People crying that they dont have exact definition of what is allowed and not allowed in each and ever possible situation are too stupid to think for themselves.
]HM[ Sabre Wolf
Obviouly, a sin going though an entire skill set fo a spike would be a bed use of the G15... but here is an interestesting senario...
Senario: Urgoz Warren 1HP BiP
- BiP plays in the final slot on the party list (slot 12)
- BiP has a Macro to use BiP on each person in the party (23 keystrokes)
Macro would be: End, PgUp, 1, PgUp, 1, PgUp, 1, PgUp, 1, PgUp, 1, PgUp, 1, PgUp, 1, PgUp, 1, PgUp, 1, PgUp, 1, PgUp, 1.
Although there is an automation of 23 keystrokes going on... there is some human involvement to run the macro. You still have to hit the key each time for the Party BiP, move around with the party, rez people, trigger gates, ect, on your own under human control. So the only thing that is being run is the actual BiP for the party.
Would this fall into the ok, bad or gray catagory?
Note: this is not being sarcastic, or working around the rules ect... I am just throwing out an actual senario of a set of diffcult set of keystrokes simplified via the G15.
Senario: Urgoz Warren 1HP BiP
- BiP plays in the final slot on the party list (slot 12)
- BiP has a Macro to use BiP on each person in the party (23 keystrokes)
Macro would be: End, PgUp, 1, PgUp, 1, PgUp, 1, PgUp, 1, PgUp, 1, PgUp, 1, PgUp, 1, PgUp, 1, PgUp, 1, PgUp, 1, PgUp, 1.
Although there is an automation of 23 keystrokes going on... there is some human involvement to run the macro. You still have to hit the key each time for the Party BiP, move around with the party, rez people, trigger gates, ect, on your own under human control. So the only thing that is being run is the actual BiP for the party.
Would this fall into the ok, bad or gray catagory?
Note: this is not being sarcastic, or working around the rules ect... I am just throwing out an actual senario of a set of diffcult set of keystrokes simplified via the G15.
MercenaryKnight
I would think that having that as a script/ macro would be ok. As far as my knowledge a bannable/ noticeable event would be if you made that necro auto follow and randomly cast the bips in a form of a bot.
I think people just don't tell the truth about their "macros" that they have been using and gotten banned for.
I think banning for anything other than bot activity would be kind of stupid in my opinion. Theres not really a reason to make macros other than laziness or having to repeat a skill a lot. But if a person wants to make a script to bip all the slots then how is it effecting anyone else.
I think people just don't tell the truth about their "macros" that they have been using and gotten banned for.
I think banning for anything other than bot activity would be kind of stupid in my opinion. Theres not really a reason to make macros other than laziness or having to repeat a skill a lot. But if a person wants to make a script to bip all the slots then how is it effecting anyone else.
wilebill
Well, we get no statement from ANet as usual. Didn't really expect one.
I think there are some guidelines posted on the World of WarCraft forums for the use of macros that are informative. Basically, in WoW you can macro keystroke sequences including spells and functions callable via WoW's internal macro language. Of course, GW does not have an internal macro language.
Sequences only though; no repetition, no looping. Internal macro language support only.
However, even in WoW following the above guidelines you can still get into trouble doing the same thing with the macro keyboard that you would be safe doing with the internal macro language. In a famous case, a player set up a simple keyboard macro to sequence three spells while leveling up his Priest.
At one point he parked the character at the side of the trail and went away for a few minutes and forgot to set AFK status. At precisely that time a Game Master showed up to have a look, a bot having detected a regular pattern of spells not implemented by the internal macro language. Since player did not respond to GM's chat, GM concluded that player was a bot and gave his account a permanent ban.
Player was a VIP in the community and the community relations manager was on his side. Even so, it took weeks to get his ban revoked.
Better safe than sorry, I think. When you don't know what your rights are, it is best to assume you have none.
I think there are some guidelines posted on the World of WarCraft forums for the use of macros that are informative. Basically, in WoW you can macro keystroke sequences including spells and functions callable via WoW's internal macro language. Of course, GW does not have an internal macro language.
Sequences only though; no repetition, no looping. Internal macro language support only.
However, even in WoW following the above guidelines you can still get into trouble doing the same thing with the macro keyboard that you would be safe doing with the internal macro language. In a famous case, a player set up a simple keyboard macro to sequence three spells while leveling up his Priest.
At one point he parked the character at the side of the trail and went away for a few minutes and forgot to set AFK status. At precisely that time a Game Master showed up to have a look, a bot having detected a regular pattern of spells not implemented by the internal macro language. Since player did not respond to GM's chat, GM concluded that player was a bot and gave his account a permanent ban.
Player was a VIP in the community and the community relations manager was on his side. Even so, it took weeks to get his ban revoked.
Better safe than sorry, I think. When you don't know what your rights are, it is best to assume you have none.
Firebaall
It's simple...
Are you active in the game ( i.e. directing the macro during it's effect )? You're fine. Even if you bind mutiple skills together and such. You're still playing.
Or.... are you not active ( i.e. turning the macro on, and leaving your computer )? Then you're not fine. You're botting.
Honestly, where's the confusion?
Are you active in the game ( i.e. directing the macro during it's effect )? You're fine. Even if you bind mutiple skills together and such. You're still playing.
Or.... are you not active ( i.e. turning the macro on, and leaving your computer )? Then you're not fine. You're botting.
Honestly, where's the confusion?
Boneyard Spleeneater
Quote:
It's simple...
Are you active in the game ( i.e. directing the macro during it's effect )? You're fine. Even if you bind mutiple skills together and such. You're still playing. Or.... are you not active ( i.e. turning the macro on, and leaving your computer )? Then you're not fine. You're botting. Honestly, where's the confusion? |
An example I just thought of is if you are running a Mo primary and H/H. You have to call targets, but you probably spend much of your time targeting your own party. A macro that selects a party member, casts a particular spell (or set of spells), and then selects the closest foe (so you can tab back to your target) would be very useful. While it may not be necessary all the time, in near wipes, being able to quickly select a party member and cast WoH or Guardian can really be useful, without having to make extra mouse movements or keystrokes that take you away from your home position.
These are not 'bot' behaviors, and I would posit they are perfectly legitimate uses for macros on a keyboard.
Perhaps instead of a grey area, there needs to be a more streamlined and defined process for appealing bans due to this (assuming this is a problem, and we aren't all talking out our collective tuckii), where the Ban-ee can e-mail the macro used and get a ruling, and either continue using it, or remove it and get unbanned quickly.
BTW, I like the idea of perma-pressing alt and ctrl. I was wondering how to pull that off. My only problem is that I have my scroll button set to tab and shift-tab (the left and right scroll wiggle, it's got range on the G5), so I can switch critters without moving my hand from skills or movement. I have, more than once, minimized the screen due to alt being pressed when I hit tab to select and enemy. Not cool.
Guess I should just turn tab off and change enemy select to something I don't use (like arrow keys).
Firebaall
Your first example is botting. If you have time to put your feet up, chat, leave the room and take a piss, or whatever else strikes your fancy.....you're botting.
Your second example is not botting.
It's clear, and only gets "grey" when people try to find excuses to bot, or justify their actions.
You not having to be there = botting.
Your second example is not botting.
It's clear, and only gets "grey" when people try to find excuses to bot, or justify their actions.
You not having to be there = botting.
xDusT II
Quote:
Obviouly, a sin going though an entire skill set fo a spike would be a bed use of the G15... but here is an interestesting senario...
Senario: Urgoz Warren 1HP BiP - BiP plays in the final slot on the party list (slot 12) - BiP has a Macro to use BiP on each person in the party (23 keystrokes) Macro would be: End, PgUp, 1, PgUp, 1, PgUp, 1, PgUp, 1, PgUp, 1, PgUp, 1, PgUp, 1, PgUp, 1, PgUp, 1, PgUp, 1, PgUp, 1. Although there is an automation of 23 keystrokes going on... there is some human involvement to run the macro. You still have to hit the key each time for the Party BiP, move around with the party, rez people, trigger gates, ect, on your own under human control. So the only thing that is being run is the actual BiP for the party. Would this fall into the ok, bad or gray catagory? Note: this is not being sarcastic, or working around the rules ect... I am just throwing out an actual senario of a set of diffcult set of keystrokes simplified via the G15. |
Stop The Storm
be nice if someone from anet came in and clarrified whats ok and whats not, because atm, noone really knows whats ban worthy and what isnt