Quote:
Originally Posted by cataphract
Hasn't the history shown us that it's the attitudes of expansion and globalisation that lead to war?
|
There is a difference between light-side capitalism and dark-side capitalism. Expansionism can also mean inclusion rather than exclusion and oppression. Because left-minded philosophies reject ethical foundation, seeking to obtain Utopia by eliminating the effort to do right, they are incapable of accepting there is difference.
Quote:
Originally Posted by HawkofStorms
Quote:
Originally Posted by Targren
You're being sarcastic, but yes, that's actually exactly the case. You cannot preach tolerance and then advocate intolerance towards those who do not conform, without losing any moral high ground to utter hypocrisy. It's like trying to legislate against stupidity.
|
They aren't preaching tolerance though.
They don't have to. They are a company. They own the product. They can do whatever they want with it.
|
They are free to push and support intolerance, bigotry, chauvinism, and prejudice as much as they like. They are free to savage their customer base by holding them accountable to the impossible. They do have that choice, lawfully or unlawfully, to do whatever they feel like. Socially, they do not have that choice.
As soon as it becomes known that ANet has chosen to promote intolerance, support cultural bigotry as a means to eliminating oponents you cannot beat, and allow random griefing of players by holding them accountable for things they cannot know ahead of time, then this game will be on its way out and so will NC West.
Tolerance and inclusion is the international standard to avoid the repeat of WW I and WW II. With the exception of one segment of fundamentalists in the Third World, that effort has been successful in avoiding atleast one Nuclear Holocaust and heating up a cold war. Tolerance is the Ethical standard by which all governing bodies, including corporations, are now accountable both socially, and in majority lawfully. So, while there may not exist any specific law requiring they actively promote tolerance, as a social vector of society, it is mandatory they do so. Their income will rely much more on toleration than the lack of it.