Instead of just rank one and rank 2, how about going up from r1 --> r10, like other titles?
I don't know, maybe I'm just being petty, but it'll look like you're doing a lot less grind.
Split Sweet Tooth, Party Animal and Drunkard into stages.
Hermos
Pleikki
Actually it looks you've done more grind imo. when i see r2 sweets it just "ah only r2" but if there was 10 ranks, when someone is r8 orso it would be "damn that guy used too much sweets"
Hermos
Oh I should have been clearer - I mean it'll feel as though you've done less grind as you progress through yourself. You can set yourself benchmarks rather than one huge milestone to accomplish.
headlesshobbs
I would like to see the effects on drunk/sweettooth grow as you get higher up in rank. Say your drunk starts to make some really funny comments and one liners compared to whats being used now and for hyperactive people to run faster, talk jibberish, etc etc.
oh and account based too btw.
oh and account based too btw.
Copenhagen Master
EITHER WAY it is a grind just split up I mean look at it 10,000 drunk minutes so you want a title for 1k, 2k, 3k, 4k, etc...???
belladonna shylock
I would agree with you Hermos except that there is no benefit to the title. Therefore making more ranks to it wouldn't really be to any benefit. Does this make sense?
MithranArkanere
The title itself won't change if you keep the upper max.
But it would be nicer to have something like 1k, 3k, 6k, 10k instead just 1k->10k. It would seem less 'hopeless' to get to the next rank.
But it would be nicer to have something like 1k, 3k, 6k, 10k instead just 1k->10k. It would seem less 'hopeless' to get to the next rank.
Shayne Hawke
You're not shifting the max title requirement at all, so what's the need to change it?
/notsigned
/notsigned
MithranArkanere
Well, it's nice to see how a bar gets filled. With more ranks in the middle, they will get filled more times.