Quote:
Originally Posted by Willow O Whisper
My thougths
Ranger is gonna stay ranger or added as a warrior varriaton.
|
Think about that for a second. Rangers/Archers/Rogues are completely different from warriors and fill completely different roles.
Even if the classes show up in completely different forms with different roles, and playstyles, having a whole new game to work in should allow them to completely redesign all 10 classes and allow them to show up in GW2, if Anet is willing to put in the effort.
However, now that I think about it allowing EVERY race to be allowed to be every profession will get incredibly messy. If they do bring back all 10 professions and have at least the 5 races we know about (humans, norn, charr, sylvari, asura)= a total of 50 different race/profession combos. Thats not even considering secondary professions, which Anet has stated they wish to keep the two-profession system.
So as much as I think restricting professions to certain races is a horrible idea, I don't see a better alternative and we can only hope they do it in a reasonable way.
Here is what I believe will happen with the professions
if they unfortunately decide to go this route:
Monk and Dervish will merge (I don't like it, but its a very reasonable idea, considering GW2 will supposedly be mostly soloable). Will probably be called a Priest or Mystic.
Necros will consume most of the rits' abilities. Called a Spiritmancer?
Sins will take the mesmer abilities. Thief or something along those lines.
Paras and warriors will become one class, but most IMBA para abilities will be lost. If it becomes a more para dominated class (to go with the soloablility of GW2) then it will a Bard. If more warriorish, Paladin.
The rest will be the same.
I think I essentially said it with my last post, but to reiterate... in order to fill up our HoMs, we had to put one of each weapon, daggers, spears, scythes, etc... so there will almost certainly be a class to wield each of these weapons, whether it is combined with another class or not.