Make "Kind Of A Big Deal" (Maxed titles rank) account wide
akyros
Why make Kind of a Big Deal (KoaBD) - Maxed titles rank account wide?
Reasons:
1. This title is neither an exclusively PvE or PvP title, it combines/tallies both (PvE + PvP) and thus reflects the acheivement of a player instead of a character (PvP titles might not have been earned by that character displaying his/her KoaBD).
2. It will allow title grinding to be spread across account as one's different characters can grind different titles instead of having one character (of one profession) do everything.
3. It doesn't cheapen any of the grind titles (Koabd keeps tally of maxed titles and is not a grind title itself), as the present titles can still remain as individual character-based or account wide.
4. We still need to farm certain titles for each character (like Sunspear, Lightbringer, Norn,Asuran etc.) to meet PvE related requirements like area access and armor crafting etc. for our individual characters.
5. Repeatedly maxing the same title for different characters should be a choice (not everyone has the time to do that for all their characters). We still have to max it on atleast one character. Some titles will still need to done on one character (like Protector and Guardian titles, to get Legendary Guardian).
6. This game has 10 fun professions to play, don't limit us to using just one to grind titles.
7. Mutually exclusive titles like Defender of Ascalon & Legendary Survivor will still be seperate on charaters but not penalise the player account-wise in terms of maxed title grinding.
8. KoaBD titles has absolutely no effect gameplay-wise, it is just for display has no skills or 'aura' benefits so it will not give newly created characters unfair advantages.
9. "God Walking Amongst Mere Mortals" does not count itself as part of no. of maxed titles, thus will not increase the no. of max titles an individual character has.
10. It was mentioned our titles & achievements will be recorded account-wide and transferred to GW2 for benefits.
11. It is already 'account-wide' display-wise in the Hall of Monument, so there is no reason why KoaBD shouldn't be officially account wide too (all it will do is let all our characters' Hall of Monument display the same Winged-Armor statue in the middle).
12. As small perk, those with KoaBD or higher don't have to switch characters just to show their friends around their Halls or display their KoaBDs.
Thank you for reading and hopefully support
Reasons:
1. This title is neither an exclusively PvE or PvP title, it combines/tallies both (PvE + PvP) and thus reflects the acheivement of a player instead of a character (PvP titles might not have been earned by that character displaying his/her KoaBD).
2. It will allow title grinding to be spread across account as one's different characters can grind different titles instead of having one character (of one profession) do everything.
3. It doesn't cheapen any of the grind titles (Koabd keeps tally of maxed titles and is not a grind title itself), as the present titles can still remain as individual character-based or account wide.
4. We still need to farm certain titles for each character (like Sunspear, Lightbringer, Norn,Asuran etc.) to meet PvE related requirements like area access and armor crafting etc. for our individual characters.
5. Repeatedly maxing the same title for different characters should be a choice (not everyone has the time to do that for all their characters). We still have to max it on atleast one character. Some titles will still need to done on one character (like Protector and Guardian titles, to get Legendary Guardian).
6. This game has 10 fun professions to play, don't limit us to using just one to grind titles.
7. Mutually exclusive titles like Defender of Ascalon & Legendary Survivor will still be seperate on charaters but not penalise the player account-wise in terms of maxed title grinding.
8. KoaBD titles has absolutely no effect gameplay-wise, it is just for display has no skills or 'aura' benefits so it will not give newly created characters unfair advantages.
9. "God Walking Amongst Mere Mortals" does not count itself as part of no. of maxed titles, thus will not increase the no. of max titles an individual character has.
10. It was mentioned our titles & achievements will be recorded account-wide and transferred to GW2 for benefits.
11. It is already 'account-wide' display-wise in the Hall of Monument, so there is no reason why KoaBD shouldn't be officially account wide too (all it will do is let all our characters' Hall of Monument display the same Winged-Armor statue in the middle).
12. As small perk, those with KoaBD or higher don't have to switch characters just to show their friends around their Halls or display their KoaBDs.
Thank you for reading and hopefully support
IronSheik
Only thing I want to see account wide is sweets/drunk. I hate having to use my holiday cons stupidly all at once on one char, and never use on any other char.
But /notsigned, when I see a r6 para I say to myself "Wow, I hate my para" Because if you can just hop to any character, i.e. 55 monk for Ruins of Morah, or 600/smite for Hidden city vanquish, it takes away a lot of the challenge of doing it the regular way.
But /notsigned, when I see a r6 para I say to myself "Wow, I hate my para" Because if you can just hop to any character, i.e. 55 monk for Ruins of Morah, or 600/smite for Hidden city vanquish, it takes away a lot of the challenge of doing it the regular way.
Shadowspawn X
/not signed
It punishes people with duplicate titles on multiple toons. Having the HoM account wide is fair enough as it stands.
It punishes people with duplicate titles on multiple toons. Having the HoM account wide is fair enough as it stands.
Shadowhaze
/signed
Anything that lessens grind is fine by me.
Don't see a problem with it unless people that have already gotten it don't want others to get it.
Anything that lessens grind is fine by me.
Don't see a problem with it unless people that have already gotten it don't want others to get it.
stale
Quote:
/signed
Anything that lessens grind is fine by me. Don't see a problem with it unless people that have already gotten it don't want others to get it. |
as far as i 'm concerned, the only two titles that shouldn't automatically be account wide are survivor and legendary defender of ascalon. even the "storyline titles" (sunspear/lightbringer) ought to be account wide.
you've ground them out once, should be enough.
Shadowspawn X
Quote:
Polgara Val
/Signed
Pol
Pol
Pistachio
I don't really care either way, though I do think that more titles should be account wide.
freakdaddy
Quote:
and the above will be the whole reason for anyone not wanting the various titles to be account wide.
as far as i 'm concerned, the only two titles that shouldn't automatically be account wide are survivor and legendary defender of ascalon. even the "storyline titles" (sunspear/lightbringer) ought to be account wide. you've ground them out once, should be enough. |
leetLoLa
/notsigned
its unfair for the ppl that got maxed koabd at many toons at the same a/c /=
its unfair for the ppl that got maxed koabd at many toons at the same a/c /=
KZaske
/Not signed.
How will making KoaBD account wide reduce grind?
How will making KoaBD account wide reduce grind?
mastar of warrior
/Notsigned...
Its not supposed to be a title thats easy to get.
its not supposed to be fast or easy.
its supposed to be a Challenge,if that means grind, so be it.
If you feel like being Lazy, Simply dont do it.
But for Heavens sake, DONT MAKE KIND OF A BIG DEAL ACCOUNT WIDE
Its not supposed to be a title thats easy to get.
its not supposed to be fast or easy.
its supposed to be a Challenge,if that means grind, so be it.
If you feel like being Lazy, Simply dont do it.
But for Heavens sake, DONT MAKE KIND OF A BIG DEAL ACCOUNT WIDE
Accursed
/notsigned
KoBD is not suppose to be an easy title to get. Hell it's easy right now, and since you can't get it, you want it to be easier.
KoBD is not suppose to be an easy title to get. Hell it's easy right now, and since you can't get it, you want it to be easier.
Coast
not signed, if u want it on several toons then u gotte do it on all toons
Shadowhaze
Quote:
and the above will be the whole reason for anyone not wanting the various titles to be account wide.
as far as i 'm concerned, the only two titles that shouldn't automatically be account wide are survivor and legendary defender of ascalon. even the "storyline titles" (sunspear/lightbringer) ought to be account wide. you've ground them out once, should be enough. |
akyros
Some of you claim it makes KoaBD cheaper and easier to get. What I proposed was to make it register account wide as it tallies the different max titles on a single account.
It's not easier to get in anyway for a player, they still have to grind for those titles the way it is now just be able to use other professions as well.
My concern is many players (including my friends and myself) end up almost always using the same character to do everything in PvE and even while resting in towns/outposts (party/ale/sweet). Only in PvP do some switch around characters, which gives account wide titles.
I just don't see why players have to be forced to limit themselves to playing one single character most of the time outside PvP, inorder to grind for Maxed title rank ranging from KoaBD to GWAMM.
It's not easier to get in anyway for a player, they still have to grind for those titles the way it is now just be able to use other professions as well.
My concern is many players (including my friends and myself) end up almost always using the same character to do everything in PvE and even while resting in towns/outposts (party/ale/sweet). Only in PvP do some switch around characters, which gives account wide titles.
I just don't see why players have to be forced to limit themselves to playing one single character most of the time outside PvP, inorder to grind for Maxed title rank ranging from KoaBD to GWAMM.
mastar of warrior
Quote:
Some of you claim it makes KoaBD cheaper and easier to get. What I proposed was to make it register account wide as it tallies the different max titles on a single account.
It's not easier to get in anyway for a player, they still have to grind for those titles the way it is now just be able to use other professions as well. My concern is many players (including my friends and myself) end up almost always using the same character to do everything in PvE and even while resting in towns/outposts (party/ale/sweet). Only in PvP do some switch around characters, which gives account wide titles. I just don't see why players have to be forced to limit themselves to playing one single character most of the time outside PvP, inorder to grind for Maxed title rank ranging from KoaBD to GWAMM. |
IronSheik
Because playing one character is part of the challenge, if you could simply hop on a sin to perma titles for a say, ritualist, how is that not easier.
KoaBD isn't mean to be easy.
KoaBD isn't mean to be easy.
akyros
akyros
Quote:
Because playing one character is part of the challenge, if you could simply hop on a sin to perma titles for a say, ritualist, how is that not easier.
KoaBD isn't mean to be easy. |
If we let people have more choice in professions, they might actually try to perma or 600 etc. themselves than hitch and leech
IronSheik
You have 8 character slots with all 3 bases, you have plenty of profession choice, this is about having the tenacity to do everything on one character, being able to do it on everything and counting as a whole certainly makes the title easier.
akyros
Well, if someone wants to have say Sweettooth on both his/her Monk and Mesmer. They'd still have to grind 20,000 points worth of sugar to display on both characters.
Tenebrae
/notsigned. Theres no reason to do that . All titles that give something useful are account wide so imho wanting the title to be displayed in all chars just for the sake of it is not needed at all.
[Morkai]
tl;dr
It's a bad idea.
It's a bad idea.
Helix Dreadlock
/notsigned
it's prestigious (sorta) let it be prestigious
it's prestigious (sorta) let it be prestigious
Nodakim
akyros
Quote:
You have 8 character slots with all 3 bases, you have plenty of profession choice, this is about having the tenacity to do everything on one character, being able to do it on everything and counting as a whole certainly makes the title easier.
|
The EotN racial titles are basically ride and leech from runners these days (sadly).
Titles like Vanquishers, Cartographers and Guardians still require (regardless of profession or build) work on the players' part.
Consumable titles (Zrank, sweet, ale, party) still consumes the same amount of gold (assuming they buy zkeys) and have no character/profession restriction with regards to tenacity or difficulty (they can farm with a 600/perma etc. then use gold to feed those titles to their KoaBD character).
Just because it's not 'farmed' (many don't even need to be) using one character, doesn't make it harder or easier but gives you more choices/ chances to try out another profession you might have mastered/favoured more if given more play time with
Nodakim
KOABD just makes people play 1 class instead of others,which is why i am not doing it.
I want to play all my "alts" my ranger,ritualist,elementalist,necro etc...
Not just my necro because he already has 10 maxed titles.
I want to play all my "alts" my ranger,ritualist,elementalist,necro etc...
Not just my necro because he already has 10 maxed titles.
akyros
Quote:
/notsigned. Theres no reason to do that . All titles that give something useful are account wide so imho wanting the title to be displayed in all chars just for the sake of it is not needed at all.
|
Many players end up not playing their other characters of different professions because they want to work on their KoaBD for that char.
Sometimes it ends up with a group/team of too many of the same profession, instead of switching characters some even opt out of play.
arch psyker
/notsigned
It's all about prestige and dedication. Honestly I was even against having the HoM account-based too even though a few of my titles benefit from it (wisdom and treasure hunter).
If you want to play your alts play your alts, if you want GWAMM play your main. It's that simple.
It's all about prestige and dedication. Honestly I was even against having the HoM account-based too even though a few of my titles benefit from it (wisdom and treasure hunter).
If you want to play your alts play your alts, if you want GWAMM play your main. It's that simple.
akyros
Regardless of how one values it (prestigious or not), it is part PvP (which is acct wide) and a measure of you as a player who has worked to maxed multiple titles, not you as a particular one-profession-pony toon/character
akyros
Quote:
/notsigned
It's all about prestige and dedication. Honestly I was even against having the HoM account-based too even though a few of my titles benefit from it (wisdom and treasure hunter). If you want to play your alts play your alts, if you want GWAMM play your main. It's that simple. |
It's a great game with great variety and fun, why end up limiting ourselves just for this virtual prestige (which when converted to GW2 will be account wide benefit anyway).
I just don't wish GW to turn into a one-profession-per-player over a prestige
IronSheik
Level 1 GWAMM Ftw, but honestly, it's just rediculous to have titles like this spread across all accounts just because you're forced to play one to get GWAMM, like arch said, you want Koabd, play Main, if you want diversity, play alts. And you aren't forcing them to one profession, do this, get KoaBD on all of your characters.
I have GWAMM on two characters, every other one can go anywhere, I have as much diversity as I want.
I have GWAMM on two characters, every other one can go anywhere, I have as much diversity as I want.
Marverick
Quote:
Then you are limiting GWAMM or just KoaBD title earners to a life of 1 profession.
It's a great game with great variety and fun, why end up limiting ourselves just for this virtual prestige (which when converted to GW2 will be account wide benefit anyway). I just don't wish GW to turn into a one-profession-per-player over a prestige |
I highly doubt it was the original intention of the game to have players play through everything with just one character. Variety was a large part of the game, at least earlier.
All titles should be account-wide. Guardian/vanquisher/etc.
If people want
Quote:
prestige |
And seriously, who the hell gets GWAMM on more than one character? I don't think there's enough of those people to warrant consideration. And even if there are, those people should seriously just turn off their computer and enjoy life.
Need More Donuts
Quote:
/Notsigned...
Its not supposed to be a title thats easy to get. its not supposed to be fast or easy. its supposed to be a Challenge,if that means grind, so be it. If you feel like being Lazy, Simply dont do it. But for Heavens sake, DONT MAKE KIND OF A BIG DEAL ACCOUNT WIDE |
/notsigned
IronSheik
Quote:
And seriously, who the hell gets GWAMM on more than one character? I don't think there's enough of those people to warrant consideration. And even if there are, those people should seriously just turn off their computer and enjoy life.
|
You may as well be talking to yourself saying that, stop posting here and enjoy life, they can enjoy it on GW, amirite.
arch psyker
I have all the diversity I need. I have 10 characters, one for each class in the game. A majority of my characters have most of every campaign open and most their profession skills unlocked. If I get tired of my GWAMM character I switch to another character.
So I don't see how choosing to go for GWAMM limits a person to playing on one character.
Ultimately it only helps the casual player achieve what a person who devotes time into one character achieve. To my knowledge the original design was to have people who could casually play the game and be equal to people who play the game hardcore.
Also it's not the intention of the developers to have a player play one character, it's the nature of MMO's. You grow attached to a character, this is your virtual self. It has been that way since Everquest in late 90's and exist in every MMO since.
There are the few exceptions of players who play multiple characters on a regular basis and the rare exception in GW that players have multiple character with GWAMM.
GWAMM is a hardcore player title and I personally believe it should stay that way.
So I don't see how choosing to go for GWAMM limits a person to playing on one character.
Ultimately it only helps the casual player achieve what a person who devotes time into one character achieve. To my knowledge the original design was to have people who could casually play the game and be equal to people who play the game hardcore.
Also it's not the intention of the developers to have a player play one character, it's the nature of MMO's. You grow attached to a character, this is your virtual self. It has been that way since Everquest in late 90's and exist in every MMO since.
There are the few exceptions of players who play multiple characters on a regular basis and the rare exception in GW that players have multiple character with GWAMM.
GWAMM is a hardcore player title and I personally believe it should stay that way.
mastar of warrior
Darth The Xx
Quote:
Why make Kind of a Big Deal (KoaBD) - Maxed titles rank account wide?
Reasons: 1. This title is neither an exclusively PvE or PvP title, it combines/tallies both (PvE + PvP) and thus reflects the acheivement of a player instead of a character (PvP titles might not have been earned by that character displaying his/her KoaBD). |