I think that the "Hero henchmen" should be removed from the player spots in the party. In PVE.
The party would have a total of 6 heroes slots aside from the party slots ,(same as now with a two player 8 man team party) Because a party of 8 real players using three heroes each would be to overpowered (8x4=32).
That will open up room for people to play with people, rather than bringing (sometimes) mandatory heroes to ensure success. and give more leeway for skill builds.
The heroes would naturally take their share of loot and gold, like they do now. so players will still be opt not using them.
Heroes not taking player spots.
Roupe
Wielder Of Magic
14 man discordway gogo?
Roupe
Yes, wouldnt that be fun ^^
But Good luck Find 8 real player discord Necro s, that desires low rate of drops and gold.
Heroes take gold & drops after all.
But Good luck Find 8 real player discord Necro s, that desires low rate of drops and gold.
Heroes take gold & drops after all.
Wielder Of Magic
Well, thats what guilds are for right 
MisterB
Terrible idea. One reason is because many skills trigger only on party members, but heroes and henchmen would just be allies.
Roupe
Well, I said nothing about them not counting as Party members (in spellcasting and effects)...
I meant that they shouldn't count as players in the party slot system.
I meant that they shouldn't count as players in the party slot system.
Kook~NBK~
No, no, and no again.
One reason: Overpowered!
One reason: Overpowered!
Zzes Tyan
14 man discord would be amazing, split up and vanq areas TWICE as fast!
but i'd prefer not killing GWs economy (again)
but i'd prefer not killing GWs economy (again)
Evasion Twenty
Hahahahaha!
oh...hes serious!?
oh...hes serious!?
own age myname
I'm all in for 7 heroes, but this is just stupidly overpowered.
/notsigned
/notsigned
Lishy
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by own age myname
I'm all in for 7 heroes, but this is just stupidly overpowered.
/notsigned |
I'll be blunt and give the harsh truth:
The reason H/H are primarily used over humans is because of people like OP.
We don't want to play with you. H/H are to AVOID people like you.
Not because they're more efficient than a team of 8 people on ventrillo, spamming overpowered pve only skills.
And for the most part, the impressions from your post certainly doesn't make us want to group either.
Marty Silverblade
You don't realise that this would remove every single scrap of difficulty from PvE don't you? Elite missions, Vloxen, Slavers, etc would be a joke, even in HM.
I'd rather have fun. /notsigned.
I'd rather have fun. /notsigned.
keithmcm
Why stop there? Why not take all your heroes and all the henchmen? 28 member party.
Bob Slydell
It would require re-balancing of the entire game to implement this.
Evasion Twenty
If it does happen, I'm blaming Izzy. 
;...;
;...;
Owik Gall
Impossible. No way. Not going to happen. +1 and a bottle of wine to close this thread, and burn it with a lighter and smeared on gasoline.
PahaLukki
Excellent idea. I've always wondered why you can't just mass an army to go adventure. Make it 32. Go go go!
gameshoes3003
That's a rather large party list upon entering the game.
Arkantos
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Evasion Twenty
Hahahahaha!
oh...hes serious!? |
Quote:
| Because a party of 8 real players using three heroes each would be to overpowered |
Anyways, God no. Full human parties are already powerful enough, we don't need the ability to run an additional 6 heroes.
Reverend Dr
New update is Super Hard Mode (SHM). Exactly like Hard Mode, but the numbers tweeked higher, so to compensate a party of 8 can bring 6 heroes!
This is an amazing idea and will surely make up for the lack of new content.
This is an amazing idea and will surely make up for the lack of new content.
pamelf
I'm all for 7 heroes, but this is just ridiculous...
reaper with no name
...
Somebody doesn't know how to do math.
8 humans + 6 heroes != 8 humans
Somebody doesn't know how to do math.
8 humans + 6 heroes != 8 humans
MithranArkanere
If there were some kind penalty for both the Heroes and its masters, it could be acceptable, but that's going to be done in GW2.
Too late for such a change in GWO.
Too late for such a change in GWO.
Brawn Over Brains
Just no.
It would be way too overpowered.
Ability to have 6 monk heroes and 8 dps?
Because PvE isn't easy enough already.
Besides, Paragons are underused enough as it is.
"Imbagon? no thanks. I have 6 monks."
It would be way too overpowered.
Ability to have 6 monk heroes and 8 dps?
Because PvE isn't easy enough already.
Besides, Paragons are underused enough as it is.
"Imbagon? no thanks. I have 6 monks."
Targren
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Brawn Over Brains
Just no.
It would be way too overpowered. Ability to have 6 monk heroes and 8 dps? Because PvE isn't easy enough already. Besides, Paragons are underused enough as it is. "Imbagon? no thanks. I have 6 monks." |
Meh. Just increase the energy gain from 16 leadership. Just think. One GFTE could fill your bar!
Mad Lord of Milk
If you made it so 14 players could be in play at the same time, you'd also have to make the game a helluva lot more difficult.
/notsigned
/notsigned
crazybanshee
Um, no. sorry, no. terrible idea. If you need to add 2x the amount of helpers to your team for pve, you're doing something horribly, horribly wrong.
stevedallas
/notsigned
Sorry, I cant agree with anything that might in some way interfere with my ability to not play with other people.
Sorry, I cant agree with anything that might in some way interfere with my ability to not play with other people.