An SF Balance that makes sense

Joe Fierce

Joe Fierce

Wilds Pathfinder

Join Date: Feb 2007

Disconnect the fascination

LF High End PvE Guild that's not filled with elitists.

R/

Okay, so, everyone boohoos about sf, yes, I agree it's rather broken, could use a balance, but not obliteration, I see the potential of balancing it as a golden opportunity for something new in the game!

See it from this perspective, in this game, everything has a guaranteed counter, conditions have removals, same with hexes, there's even skills that prevent them, Spells being cast upon you have counters aswell the list goes:

SB SF OF VoS

Okay, Sf, obviously broken because it also fits into this category, Prevents all attacks from striking:

SF (mist form is KIIIINNNDA here, but attacks still hit)

So here's my suggestion, remove the anti spell aspect of SF, just leave it as a constant block of attacks. WE DON'T HAVE THIS IN THE GAME YET!

I already know what you're going to say "we'll all he needs then is an SB monk to constantly SB him" EXACTLY!!!! Two people with bars completely geared towards keeping a tank alive is so much closer to being balanced, a majority of speed clears would no longer function, and would no longer be very "speedy" as they'd require so many monks to keep all the sins up, destroying that meta, but at the same time, it could still be used for tank and spank builds and niche farming spots, keeping everyone happy, it's not nerfed into the ground, but it also no longer owns everything ever, gg.

Chocobo1

Chocobo1

Desert Nomad

Join Date: Sep 2007

New Zealand

CoA

N/

*Tears eyes out*

zelgadissan

zelgadissan

Forge Runner

Join Date: Feb 2008

The Warrior Priests [WP]

Me/Rt

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Fierce View Post
An SF Balance that makes sense
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Fierce View Post
I agree it's rather broken, could use a balance, but not obliteration
Stopped reading.

Joe Fierce

Joe Fierce

Wilds Pathfinder

Join Date: Feb 2007

Disconnect the fascination

LF High End PvE Guild that's not filled with elitists.

R/

Quote:
Originally Posted by zelgadissan View Post
Stopped thinking.
FTFY.

Balance is appropriate, not obliteration, unless you think the change to smiter's boon was an intelligent well thought out and perfectly balanced one, in which case, you really don't want a balanced game do you? you're just citing "balance" in your arguments against SF as an idea, but not one you want to be fulfilled, just a pretty idea.

So you'd like another skill added to the list of functionally useless skills that already exists.

To quote a great bunch of hippies: "No one's right when everyone is wrong" Buffalo Springfield.

zelgadissan

zelgadissan

Forge Runner

Join Date: Feb 2008

The Warrior Priests [WP]

Me/Rt

Balance does not equal invulnerability, in any sense. If you want to include Mist Form, Spell Shield, Obsidian Flesh, Spell Breaker in the category of what should be destroyed, that's fine with me too.

upier

upier

Grotto Attendant

Join Date: Mar 2006

Done.

[JUNK]

I was thinking that it might be interesting to toy with completely removing the ability to deal damage while under it.

Joe Fierce

Joe Fierce

Wilds Pathfinder

Join Date: Feb 2007

Disconnect the fascination

LF High End PvE Guild that's not filled with elitists.

R/

Quote:
Originally Posted by zelgadissan View Post
Balance does not equal invulnerability, in any sense. If you want to include Mist Form, Spell Shield, Obsidian Flesh, Spell Breaker in the category of what should be destroyed, that's fine with me too.
There is no guaranteed invulnerability in any of those skills, they are all working in combination with others to achieve a closeness to invulnerability. And even then, the 600 monk with SB or spell shield can meet interrupts, and knock downs, the obsidian flesh can do meet the same fate, as can mist form hardly invulnerable, hard ot kill, yes, invulnerable, no. SF is the only one that avoids these things, so yes, sf in it's current state should be retooled so this is no longer possible.

Quote:
Originally Posted by upier View Post
I was thinking that it might be interesting to toy with completely removing the ability to deal damage while under it.

That in combination with my suggestion would be brilliant. Then it would be useful only for what it was originally intended for, tanking.

Everyone claims to want it "balanced" when all they truly want is for it to be effed into the ground, and whine, and complain, and do nothing about it, at least I'm making suggestions that would lead to the "balance" people so claim to desire.

Mason717

Mason717

Academy Page

Join Date: Aug 2008

Lion's Arch

Desolation Lords [DL]

A/

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Fierce View Post
a majority of speed clears would no longer function
People would just go back to OF. DoASC wouldn't be much slower if at all with RR Candy.

upier

upier

Grotto Attendant

Join Date: Mar 2006

Done.

[JUNK]

You can't really do a simple Obsi vs. SB vs. Mist vs. SF comparison.
You also need to look at what line that skill is in, what other conditions one must fulfil to get the full advantage of the skill, ...
I am actually for keeping the whole "every attack and spell fails". It just that by doing so, you'd need to be effectively removed out of the game. It's insane defence should be countered by it's lack of offence.

I'd say keep it for running, but completely trash it for any kind of damage dealing.

(But then again, I might be partial because I like running with SF while I do not care about killing with it. )

Joe Fierce

Joe Fierce

Wilds Pathfinder

Join Date: Feb 2007

Disconnect the fascination

LF High End PvE Guild that's not filled with elitists.

R/

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mason717 View Post
People would just go back to OF. DoASC wouldn't be much slower if at all with RR Candy.
My point still sort of stands though, think about how many people in the party contribute to keeping the tank alive and how many skills and skill bars are built just for that..... then look at the one skill bar needed or sf.

If it takes a group effort to keep someone alive to tank, it's more understandable.

drkn

drkn

Forge Runner

Join Date: Jan 2009

Wroc??aw, Poland

Midnight Mayhem

Me/

set atk modifier to 0% (no dmg dealt as upier said) + some health/e degen, so that shadow form can be maintained a long time, but not infinitely without any secondary support.

droks run can be done with a dervish, so that one of the underpowered classes gets some pros, while sf still can be used to tank, just not to be out there solo / with other sins.

Joe Fierce

Joe Fierce

Wilds Pathfinder

Join Date: Feb 2007

Disconnect the fascination

LF High End PvE Guild that's not filled with elitists.

R/

Quote:
Originally Posted by drkn View Post
set atk modifier to 0% (no dmg dealt as upier said) + some health/e degen, so that shadow form can be maintained a long time, but not infinitely without any secondary support.

droks run can be done with a dervish, so that one of the underpowered classes gets some pros, while sf still can be used to tank, just not to be out there solo / with other sins.
Zealous scythe, shadow refuge.

subarucar

subarucar

Desert Nomad

Join Date: Jul 2006

New Zealand

None

For limiting energy you could make it set you energy regen to +2 or something. To stop zealous scythes make it so you cannot attack/all attacks miss.

I like the idea of having a skill that allows another class to tank, however being invincible and still being able to deal damage is extremely OP.

I'm not sure if it's just the way I've played DoA, but the perma tanks cannot keep SF up indefinitely, meaning they must ball the group quickly, and the team must be fast in killing before SF drops. Something like this would be a good nerf for SF, however something different may be required, otherwise the game will just end up being spikeways, in fact it pretty much is.

Joe Fierce

Joe Fierce

Wilds Pathfinder

Join Date: Feb 2007

Disconnect the fascination

LF High End PvE Guild that's not filled with elitists.

R/

Quote:
Originally Posted by subarucar View Post
For limiting energy you could make it set you energy regen to +2 or something. To stop zealous scythes make it so you cannot attack/all attacks miss.

I like the idea of having a skill that allows another class to tank, however being invincible and still being able to deal damage is extremely OP.

I'm not sure if it's just the way I've played DoA, but the perma tanks cannot keep SF up indefinitely, meaning they must ball the group quickly, and the team must be fast in killing before SF drops. Something like this would be a good nerf for SF, however something different may be required, otherwise the game will just end up being spikeways, in fact it pretty much is.
Without some invincibility for extended (varying definition on the word extended) periods of time from a tank, pressure is phased out and spike meta is in, then rename the name to spike wars, so like you said, tanking and dealing damage at same time is op, that's the op part of sf.

BlackSephir

BlackSephir

Forge Runner

Join Date: Nov 2006

A/N

Make it an Assassin Form, like dervs have. Make it a form that gives you ims and ias. No THEY CAN'T ATTACK YOU LOL bullshit.
If you want to balance something you might want to address the problem and make it balanced, not nerfed into oblivion. We have enough useless skills as it is.

Tenebrae

Tenebrae

Forge Runner

Join Date: Feb 2007

Spain

LHV

R/N

Make it like a shadow. For Z seconds You deal X% less damage , recieve Y less damage , cant be target of foe spells , enchants and you recieve -75% less healing. Could be mantained ? maybe yes , or no , thats another question ofc .

PS: X Y Z depend of shadow arts ofc .

stanzhao

stanzhao

Frost Gate Guardian

Join Date: Mar 2008

if you can use spells against shadow form, and not taking away the health loss, any foe with an enchant remover will get you down to 50 health and spank you... making it usless for 95% of the game.

you need to touch the skills around it, like deadly paradox, so that it cant be kept up constantly, hit glyph of swiftness needing points in air magic, or reduce movement speed while under shadow form so you cant 'speedclear'.

BlueNovember

BlueNovember

Wilds Pathfinder

Join Date: Sep 2005

WTS GW2 items for Zkey

Mo/

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Fierce View Post
Balance is appropriate, not obliteration, unless you think the change to smiter's boon was an intelligent well thought out and perfectly balanced one
<--- Pretty much.
Skills that shouldn't be in the game should be effectively removed from the game.

rb.widow

Lion's Arch Merchant

Join Date: Jul 2009

Your trying to nerf a skill that it used by people who dont run UWSC though, its a catch 22, you nerf it for one group who exploit its power, and screw over the honest group who dont.

They should just add random traps around the underworld that spike for 400 damage and remove all enchantments from target who triggered them. That'd make balanced teams a must.

DragonRogue

DragonRogue

Lion's Arch Merchant

Join Date: May 2007

Seattle, WA USA

Demon Dawg Knights

E/Me

it was mentioned in another thread that since the addition of deaths charge to the UW, the old mechanic of keeping core only skills in the UW has been thrown out the window. This now allows for any skill in the game to be added to UW. Such as Sig of Disenchantment. Add this to a few areas thru out the UW, and SCs will be killed without upsetting the SF build as a whole. Since it is obvious that Anet doesnt want to piss off all those using SF, making them leave to play another game, and that redesigning the area to slow SCs down is the answer, then let them change the area with a few more extra wild cards.

BlackSephir

BlackSephir

Forge Runner

Join Date: Nov 2006

A/N

Quote:
Originally Posted by rb.widow View Post
Your trying to nerf a skill that it used by people who dont run UWSC though, its a catch 22, you nerf it for one group who exploit its power, and screw over the honest group who dont.

They should just add random traps around the underworld that spike for 400 damage and remove all enchantments from target who triggered them. That'd make balanced teams a must.
Stop the jokes, SF isn't used in normal play and that's the problem. It's only used in gimmicky farming/running builds.
Quote:
Skills that shouldn't be in the game should be effectively removed from the game.
Or changed so that its effect would no longer harm the game and be useful at the same time.
Apparently some people don't get this. Those people know shit about balancing and the only things they can think of is "BUFF IT TO HEAVENS" AND "NERF IT TO OBLIVION".

gremlin

Furnace Stoker

Join Date: Oct 2006

GWAR

Me/Mo

I don't have enough information to decide why and how this skill should be changed.
So I will leave that to the experts but the current builds would seem to go against what the assassin was in its infancy.

I always thought they intended the assassin to be surgical tool of the melee classes.
Never a tank but a fast moving strike and run class with the ability to disable and maybe kill one target then get out of range again.

The ability to remain in combat almost indefinitely seems against the spirit of the class.
If that's what people want then its fine by me, as long as its not compulsory

vamp08

vamp08

Krytan Explorer

Join Date: Nov 2006

PA, USA

[COPY]

D/

Quote:
Originally Posted by upier View Post
... It just that by doing so, you'd need to be effectively removed out of the game. It's insane defence should be countered by it's lack of offence.
Shadow Form:

For X sec. you cannot be the target of spells or attacks; You can not cast spells, skills or signets while under the effects of this enchantment. You move 33% faster.

B = tenative

Steps_Descending

Steps_Descending

Wilds Pathfinder

Join Date: Apr 2007

IN my pocket plane. Obviously!

Little Tom's Pocket Plane [THom]

Me/Mo

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Fierce View Post
That in combination with my suggestion would be brilliant. Then it would be useful only for what it was originally intended for, tanking.
Was it indeed the original point of the skill? Do we really want it to be usable to tank? Do you really like to have a completely invincible tank in a game? (OK not 100% invincible, but the closest we have to invincibility)

I tought the idea of the skill was to keep the assassin alive without allowign it to stay focused for hours. Basically to stay up long enough for a kill.

Personnally I'd go for something like that :

For 25 sec (at 16 shadowArt, that means 30 sec with enchant mod), Attack and spells against you miss. Cooldown : 60 sec.
That would mean the minimum cooldown is 30 sec, it last 30 sec. But there is a 1-2 second window while you recast it that kills you if you tank. Maybe the window should be bigger to make sure the sin die even with a monk.
And in normal gameplay it still give near total protection, just have to make sure you're away from the fight for 2-3 second once in a while.

upier

upier

Grotto Attendant

Join Date: Mar 2006

Done.

[JUNK]

Quote:
Originally Posted by vamp08 View Post
Shadow Form:

For X sec. you cannot be the target of spells or attacks; You can not cast spells, skills or signets while under the effects of this enchantment. You move 33% faster.

B = tenative
Maybe something like:
For X sec. you cannot be the target of spells or attacks. While under the effects of this enchantment you can not attack nor can you cast spells OUTSIDE of SF.


And then, keep the ability to keep it up permanently alive.

BlackSephir

BlackSephir

Forge Runner

Join Date: Nov 2006

A/N

About as useful as Defy Pain.
Which means FA would be full of SF sins.

upier

upier

Grotto Attendant

Join Date: Mar 2006

Done.

[JUNK]

I thought we were talking about a PvE-only change?

Icy The Mage

Icy The Mage

Forge Runner

Join Date: Apr 2008

Canada

E/

Quote:
Originally Posted by subarucar View Post
For limiting energy you could make it set you energy regen to +2 or something. To stop zealous scythes make it so you cannot attack/all attacks miss.

I like the idea of having a skill that allows another class to tank, however being invincible and still being able to deal damage is extremely OP.

I'm not sure if it's just the way I've played DoA, but the perma tanks cannot keep SF up indefinitely, meaning they must ball the group quickly, and the team must be fast in killing before SF drops. Something like this would be a good nerf for SF, however something different may be required, otherwise the game will just end up being spikeways, in fact it pretty much is.
New bar = DP/SF/Armor of Earth/Stoneflesh/LB Sig/DC/GoLE/anything else - really, you can just take out the sliver skills (or even armor of earth really) for GoLE and you'll be fine.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steps_Descending View Post
Was it indeed the original point of the skill? Do we really want it to be usable to tank? Do you really like to have a completely invincible tank in a game? (OK not 100% invincible, but the closest we have to invincibility)

I tought the idea of the skill was to keep the assassin alive without allowign it to stay focused for hours. Basically to stay up long enough for a kill.

Personnally I'd go for something like that :

For 25 sec (at 16 shadowArt, that means 30 sec with enchant mod), Attack and spells against you miss. Cooldown : 60 sec.
That would mean the minimum cooldown is 30 sec, it last 30 sec. But there is a 1-2 second window while you recast it that kills you if you tank. Maybe the window should be bigger to make sure the sin die even with a monk.
And in normal gameplay it still give near total protection, just have to make sure you're away from the fight for 2-3 second once in a while.
Therefore, at 17 (12+1+3+1 from grail of might) = 26 or 27s, which is easily maintainable with glyph and deadly, even candy corn or apples could be used so you wouldn't need glyph :P

Eragon Zarroc

Eragon Zarroc

Atra estern?? ono thelduin

Join Date: Jan 2008

Madness Incarnate

[Duo]

W/P

just quit >_< please and thank you.

Chthon

Grotto Attendant

Join Date: Apr 2007

Quote:
Originally Posted by zelgadissan View Post
Balance does not equal invulnerability, in any sense. If you want to include Mist Form, Spell Shield, Obsidian Flesh, Spell Breaker in the category of what should be destroyed, that's fine with me too.
I don't think I agree. The can't-be-target-of-spells mechanic is strong, but not inherently overpowered. Spell Shield and Obsidian Flesh have such nasty drawbacks that I don't find them problematic. Spell Breaker is only a problem with cons pushing its duration up higher and higher. Mist Form is a joke (and is a different mechanic anyway). The problem with SF is that its original drawback (which was so nasty it was considered a total junk skill) was essentially removed, as you can make sure it never triggers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by upier View Post
I was thinking that it might be interesting to toy with completely removing the ability to deal damage while under it.
While that would stop perma farming and speed clearing, we'd still have to endure perma tank-n-spank.

Steps_Descending

Steps_Descending

Wilds Pathfinder

Join Date: Apr 2007

IN my pocket plane. Obviously!

Little Tom's Pocket Plane [THom]

Me/Mo

You really want to keep ShadowTanking don't you Upier?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eragon Zarroc View Post
just quit >_< please and thank you.
Who? Me? I hope not!
Quote:
Originally Posted by IcyFiftyFive View Post
Therefore, at 17 (12+1+3+1 from grail of might) = 26 or 27s, which is easily maintainable with glyph and deadly, even candy corn or apples could be used so you wouldn't need glyph :P
He... Didn't think about them.

That means we're left with 3 option if we just change the duration :
1) The gap is big enough to make impratical for farming use. Reverting it back to something close the original 22 sec. So it's impossible to farm with it, but a casual assa could use a lot of cons and get near invincicility. Which won't happen, the farmers will probably use the cons and pray the monk can keep the tank alive for 2 second while he recasts SF.

2)Accept a maintainable SF with all the tanking that comes with it.

3) Have a patch rule in the line of : "SF cannot last more than X seconds" No matter what the Shadow Art stat is, what enchant mod you have or what cons you have.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chthon View Post
I don't think I agree. The can't-be-target-of-spells mechanic is strong, but not inherently overpowered. Spell Shield and Obsidian Flesh have such nasty drawbacks that I don't find them problematic. Spell Breaker is only a problem with cons pushing its duration up higher and higher. Mist Form is a joke (and is a different mechanic anyway). The problem with SF is that its original drawback (which was so nasty it was considered a total junk skill) was essentially removed, as you can make sure it never triggers.
Chthon just summed it up. SF has a strong mecanic along with an upgraded version of another defensive mecanic as well as no drawbacks.

BUt hey! don't say Mist Form is a joke! I LOVE Mist Form! It's a fun skill! (and it's the only "invulnerability" skill that noone complains about. they could have made it naturally maintanable, even in PvP I don't think that would be SO gamebreaking)
I hope I did enough to make it clear I wasn't serious.

Fitz Rinley

Fitz Rinley

Wilds Pathfinder

Join Date: Oct 2005

The Rusty Rose

W/Mo

The problem with SF is that it covers too many needs for the player base that the Dev.'s failed to satisfy in other ways. SF is important for most farming groups. Still, at least they are groups now, more than solo farmers and mass botting. If the economy in GW had ever been functional, instead of full of scammers, power mongers, elites who had full access and use of every exploit for months before it was nerfed, etc. - then trade would have been more fair and there wouldn't have been this massive reliance on min./maxed builds to farm so you can achieve game goals.

Of those I know who have left GW it is principally because the game is solely about farming. Of those who remain, they are either fascinated by the pretty pictures or consider farming to be the point of video gaming (whack-a-mole with bragging rights). It was bad about it when FoW and UW were exclusively controlled by HA. With the advent of Factions the Dev.s increased accessibility to gold, but exponentially increased the amount of farming in the game. Nightfall and Eye merely solidified this trend so that the only point to playing GW now is to farm for titles/items.

When they created a set-up with limited leveling - so that players could all be on an equivalent playing field (with equal obligations to practice) they failed to observe two other areas that would need level playing fields. One was financial success in game so that a character could readily obtain those things that made the appearance of what they played appealing. Another was leveling of skill effects so that all classes were equally functional. (I will give that this latter is very very hard to do - since min./maxers would then place the equivalent max effect skills of each class into a build nazi requirement to overpower the game and then complain because they didn't take time to enjoy it.)

SF needs to be left alone or even returned to its original functionallity until all classes are equally functional skill wise.

FengShuiDove

FengShuiDove

Forge Runner

Join Date: Sep 2007

Trinity of the Ascended [ToA]

A/

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueNovember View Post
<--- Pretty much.
Skills that shouldn't be in the game should be effectively removed from the game.
So, changing a skill's functionality so that it no longer resembles the previous form in any way but name isn't sufficient, you would have a skill destroyed because it has somehow offended you? If it's an entirely different skill except for the name, what's the harm in having it remain a perfectly legitimate skill in an entirely different way than before?

I'm beginning to think people just hate the words "Shadow" and "Form" used conjunctively.

Is the OP's idea great? Nah, not really. But I agree with the idea of changing it so that it's still usable, just not for farming. Despite the heavy opposition to this (for whatever reason) in this thread, it really is the best course of action. Leaving it the same in functionality but changing certain aspects won't be good enough -- people will find ways around anything. Nerfing it into the ground wouldn't be smart -- it's removing a skill from usefulness and limiting the abilities of the profession without expanding them elsewhere.

Don't just be a pissy pants because you hate Shadow Form as it currently is. People calling for "balance" then calling for Smiter's Boon treatment should realize just how self-contradictory that is.

upier

upier

Grotto Attendant

Join Date: Mar 2006

Done.

[JUNK]

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steps_Descending View Post
You really want to keep ShadowTanking don't you Upier?
I've used SF a few times to run.
I wouldn't dream of wasting a perfectly good damage dealing slot for a tank.

MagmaRed

MagmaRed

Furnace Stoker

Join Date: Mar 2007

Our Crabs Know True [LOVE]

R/

Before this gets closed or merged with one of the many other SF topics.....

Perma is the problem, not SF. I have absolutely no problem with Shadow Form at all. I do have a problem with being able to maintain it 100% of the time. Though perhaps an easy fix that wouldn't completely restrict it from being perma, but would stop its abuse for farming.... make it like VoS. Can't be the target of any spell, friendly or enemy with it on. This would allow people to use daggers/spears/scythes/bows/etc. to do damage, but would not allow them to recast until it ended. Would also prevent all skills like Zealot's Fire from working to make a damage source out of the SF tank.

Joe Fierce

Joe Fierce

Wilds Pathfinder

Join Date: Feb 2007

Disconnect the fascination

LF High End PvE Guild that's not filled with elitists.

R/

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chthon View Post
While that would stop perma farming and speed clearing, we'd still have to endure perma tank-n-spank.
That's still making a move more towards semi-balance than we've had in a long damned time.

Bob Slydell

Forge Runner

Join Date: Jan 2007

http://www.wiki.guildwars.com/index....&oldid=1720146

That is the only balance that can be done to SF at this point.


Seriously though...How bout make SF end after a set amount of attacks.

subarucar

subarucar

Desert Nomad

Join Date: Jul 2006

New Zealand

None

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrisworld View Post
http://www.wiki.guildwars.com/index....&oldid=1720146

That is the only balance that can be done to SF at this point.


Seriously though...How bout make SF end after a set amount of attacks.
Lulz, I expected a link to Smiter's Boon.

Joe Fierce

Joe Fierce

Wilds Pathfinder

Join Date: Feb 2007

Disconnect the fascination

LF High End PvE Guild that's not filled with elitists.

R/

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueNovember View Post
<--- Pretty much.
Skills that shouldn't be in the game should be effectively removed from the game.
Or balanced to where they fit in the game. gg

Tenebrae

Tenebrae

Forge Runner

Join Date: Feb 2007

Spain

LHV

R/N

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Fierce View Post
That's still making a move more towards semi-balance than we've had in a long damned time.
You are right but Anet had plenty of time to do something better ..... it would be a little "empty" victory but still a win yep.