I was comparing the (warrior's) Enduring Scythe and the (ranger's) Pet Scythe builds from pvxwiki, and was curious as to which mold has greater dps potential, what their respective advantages are, or if one just trumps the other one on all counts?
Thanks.
scythe ranger or warrior
Kafiri_Mkorogai
IronSheik
These?
OgojYpXa6SAYMXNXvl4G8gyg0GA
OQoiExpMZXIU0cxc9WKDGDyXB
Warrior.
OgojYpXa6SAYMXNXvl4G8gyg0GA
OQoiExpMZXIU0cxc9WKDGDyXB
Warrior.
Ugh
Ranger has Bleeding (lol), Deep Wound, and a pet for extra damage and bodyblocking.
Warrior has Strength for armor penetration and SY for defense.
I'd say Warrior is better if you don't already have an Imbagon or someone else spamming SY. Otherwise, Ranger is better.
Warrior has Strength for armor penetration and SY for defense.
I'd say Warrior is better if you don't already have an Imbagon or someone else spamming SY. Otherwise, Ranger is better.
mistokibbles
Pets in PvE are bad anyway, even with the changes anet made a while back. Warrior's build is better for HM and ranger's for NM imo. Save Yourselves counters the high damage dealers in HM, like elementalists.
kupp
Warrior, hands down.
Strenght atribute.
Higher armor.
SY and other adrenal skills.
This are the reasons why a scythe warrior will trump over any other scythe char (hell even dervishes imo). Higher DPS, utility, and skill spamability, pets are laughable anyway.
Strenght atribute.
Higher armor.
SY and other adrenal skills.
This are the reasons why a scythe warrior will trump over any other scythe char (hell even dervishes imo). Higher DPS, utility, and skill spamability, pets are laughable anyway.
KiLLi4N
Definitely warrior.
reaper with no name
It goes like this:
Scythe Sin > Scythe Warrior > Scythe Dervish > Scythe Ranger
Assuming all out damage builds, anyway (a scythe ranger, for example, beats out a WS dervish).
Scythe Sin > Scythe Warrior > Scythe Dervish > Scythe Ranger
Assuming all out damage builds, anyway (a scythe ranger, for example, beats out a WS dervish).