I am sorry if I missed a topic asking this, but I did not find one and most of the more general topics tend to get swamped, and I havent found an awnser to this at all.
And, yes, I know Anets stated Texmod in some sort of original version is okay, but that does not really say anything about the cartography mods at all, which is why I am asking, and I would like to know their stance on this.
And, im just going to do a factual dump on people so theres some background to considor before posts get dumped on people
Texmod takes a Cartography mod, which is usualy a package of unfogged maps, and overlays it over your ingame map, and usualy does some type of coloring/ect over the fogged areas to point out areas that need to be explored.
As a example, on the Offical Wiki: http://wiki.guildwars.com/wiki/User:...aphy_Made_Easy
First, anyone old enough to have seen it, or maybe with some archive digging, before texmod came out, some players figured out how to take your current ingame maps and compare them to maps provided by 100% cartographers, eventuly reaching methods like overlays and fog recoloring, and at that time, there was really no fuss from anybody and mostly gratitude from people that were trying to scrape the last couple % they needed and couldnt figure out where it was.
Course, right now, I dont know where I can find evidence of this, but im pretty sure there was some of things of this on guru in the days before texmod, so, I shall attempt to do some digging and find some things of this nature to back this up.
The only difference between those out of game methods and Texmods cartography packs is that Texmod intregrates it into GW by some method.
So, in a manner of figuring out possible stances, theres a few specific attributes someone would argue against texmods cartography mods
1. Its a third party program that interacts with GW
2. It helps to pinpoint areas to explore while inside the game towards the Cartography title.
Thats the main two reasons I can think of, but I may have missed more, but Texmods Cartography mods only did so much to begin with, but its late at night, so I might have missed something due to my tiredness.
So, in the end, theres two primary reasons for any person to want Texmod/Cart to be banned, because it interacts with the GW client and that it aids in the pursuit of Cartographer.
So, For the audience, questions to ask yourselves.
What do I think of these things and about Texmods Cartopgrahy aid, and other general thoughts on the topic?
And, if you have gotten the Grandmaster Cartographer, how did you get it?, did you use texmod, or maps out of the game? or just scraping and rescraping every explorable in the game until it got done?
And for Arenanet, what is your stance on the use of Cartographer tools and Texmods Cartographer packages in particular? Again, Texmod doesnt function like a bot, it just changes graphics.
And, for you readers, im sorry if my posting is an eyesore or my large text/fact posting is a bother, its in my nature to accumilate data and present it along with these sorts of things...
Arenanets stance on Texmod/Cartography mods?
1 pages • Page 1
Quote:
Which, is why I am asking, because, Texmod being uses in conjunction with this isnt the same as texmod being used, well, by itself.
I'm guessing is that as long as it doesn't change the gameplay of Guild Wars (such as changing the graphics) or using a mod to help on certain titles or more enjoyable (cartographer), then Texmod is tolerated and they won't ban you for that. But at the same time, they don't condone the use of these programs and if your computer crashes due to Texmod, then ArenaNet support team can't help you out.
It's quite ambiguous, but ArenaNet mostly targets the botting third-party programs where it does tasks automatically while you are away from keyboard.
So using Texmod as some sort of guide on cartography is okay, but having a bot that does Cartography for you isn't. I think video recording programs used to record your actions while playing Guild Wars (i.e. FRAPS) is okay in ANet's standards.
It's quite ambiguous, but ArenaNet mostly targets the botting third-party programs where it does tasks automatically while you are away from keyboard.
So using Texmod as some sort of guide on cartography is okay, but having a bot that does Cartography for you isn't. I think video recording programs used to record your actions while playing Guild Wars (i.e. FRAPS) is okay in ANet's standards.
Because people posting about ten other things every few would bury my post fast enough that my post would be overlooked, theres been a spike in guru activty and posting, and I cant count on enough people or Anet folks to dig through a topic piled with other peoples things and manage to awnser my question, heck, I seen other folks trying to ask this in some of those threads and they got flat out ignored or overlooked.
So, I am asking directly in a visible fashion.
So, I am asking directly in a visible fashion.
Quote:
|
I'm guessing is that as long as it doesn't change the gameplay of Guild Wars (such as changing the graphics) or using a mod to help on certain titles or more enjoyable (cartographer), then Texmod is tolerated and they won't ban you for that. But at the same time, they don't condone the use of these programs and if your computer crashes due to Texmod, then ArenaNet support team can't help you out.
It's quite ambiguous, but ArenaNet mostly targets the botting third-party programs where it does tasks automatically while you are away from keyboard. So using Texmod as some sort of guide on cartography is okay, but having a bot that does Cartography for you isn't. I think video recording programs used to record your actions while playing Guild Wars (i.e. FRAPS) is okay in ANet's standards. |
but, I have been hearing reports of people that got caught in the mass ban by using texmod, but you cant know if they are just lying botters without any hard evidence, but It has me concerned regardless, and I want some kind of awnser about this, because I would hate to eat a permaban for using Texmods Cartography stuff .
Heck, this stuff is still listed on the Offical Wiki mind you, despite Anet giving their third party disclaimer, permabanning peeople using texmod for mistaking them as botters would be bad, espeicaly knowing how, well, annoying NCsoft support is at times, might be bad enough that account recovery would be impossible.
Either way, a specific response from a Rep and some assurance that people wont get accidently banned to any bad extent would be good to hear, or the specific explained no, followed by warnings on the wiki and removal of the stuff on it.
I do not want uncertainty.... <,<
Quote:
|
I've been using Texmod with Cartography for like.. 2,5 years. Last time was like 3 weeks ago. I wasn't banned. Good enough answer for you?
![]() |
Almost <,<
Part of the issue I see is, that, as Obi Wan said so long ago, about certian points of view, is that it can easly be seen that using tools like this for cartography can be seen as cheating, so, It would be good to know what the offical view is from the bosses.
O
about a month ago i went from none to leg cartographer AND logged 2250 drunk min with autoclicker. no ban for me (though i have stopped using auto clicker... up to 2500 now and i can honestly say this title has become an excruciating ordeal. no idea how i can do that 31 more times...
g
I really think they don't consider this program a problem.
They are concerned about programs that give a player a real time edge in the game.
Programs that automate game activities or rapid chain skills would come under scrutiny as would using exploits known or otherwise.
I do not think I have heard of anyone complaining of a ban for using texmod and with my eyesight I find cartography a lot less painful using it.
They are concerned about programs that give a player a real time edge in the game.
Programs that automate game activities or rapid chain skills would come under scrutiny as would using exploits known or otherwise.
I do not think I have heard of anyone complaining of a ban for using texmod and with my eyesight I find cartography a lot less painful using it.
We are not Anet. Guru is not Anet. Since the only answer you will accept (from what you are saying) is one from Anet, try emailing them. Everything else you read here will be speculation. People haven't been banned for it, yet you say it is 'seen as cheating' so maybe it can happen. Try asking the right people, which you can't do here unless you PM a staff member from Anet. Rarely do they respond to topics like this unless it is a major hotspot.
Quote:
|
So, For the audience, questions to ask yourselves.
What do I think of these things and about Texmods Cartopgrahy aid, and other general thoughts on the topic? |
Quote:
|
And, if you have gotten the Grandmaster Cartographer, how did you get it?, did you use texmod, or maps out of the game? or just scraping and rescraping every explorable in the game until it got done?
|
Their stance is that they are not going to actively pursue banning people who use texmod, but that doesn't mean they cannot ban you for using texmod. so use it at your own risk. you could be fine, you could get banned.
If in doubt just email them and ask. From what I’ve heard their stance is: "We do not support the use of 3rd party mods; you won't get banned for using them. But, if they screw up your character, key log you etc then it’s your own fault and there's nothing we can do about it."
I think stuff like TexMod which just causes Client-Side mods only is ok; as long as it doesn’t play the game for you, affect other players and or guild wars code then its fine.
But like I said if you’re still unsure just email support and ask but I’m pretty sure they'll say the exact same thing.
I think stuff like TexMod which just causes Client-Side mods only is ok; as long as it doesn’t play the game for you, affect other players and or guild wars code then its fine.
But like I said if you’re still unsure just email support and ask but I’m pretty sure they'll say the exact same thing.
I used Texmod to help the achieve the cartography title. I still had to do the required running around and scraping of walls for the title; just like those who didn't use it. Texmod just showed me where I needed to scrape. As far as I understand this is not the kind of mod Anet is talking about. If it was, there would be a lot more then 3700 bans. Texmod does not make it easier to earn gold and neither does it alter the gameplay in any way.
The type of bots people got banned for gave them advantages in pvp against the non-bot players, and I suppose better ways to make gold and in turn affect the GW economy. Once I saw several players humping one another in outposts (sort of in a standing doggie-style), one even tried to do it to me
. I'm certain this type of mod would get you banned too, as I never saw the humping toons again.
Texmod actually made achieving the title a bit more fun, and I'm 99% sure it's a fine mod to use.
The type of bots people got banned for gave them advantages in pvp against the non-bot players, and I suppose better ways to make gold and in turn affect the GW economy. Once I saw several players humping one another in outposts (sort of in a standing doggie-style), one even tried to do it to me
. I'm certain this type of mod would get you banned too, as I never saw the humping toons again. Texmod actually made achieving the title a bit more fun, and I'm 99% sure it's a fine mod to use.
How is it a whole different kettle? Texmod used for cartography also changes nothing but graphics that only you can see. It reskins the map, just as other texmod packages reskin other parts of the UI (radar, etc.) or other graphics (armor, pets, etc.). Texmod doesn't suddenly start modifying the client or sending signals to the server or whatever it is you fear just because you're using it for cartography.
t


